Research
Types of Scientific Questions (for stronger claims)
describe (what happens, how often, for who?)
predict (what is likely?)
explain (what ___ accounts for ___?)
influence (can evidence improve outcomes/environments?)
Methods
naturalistic observation (researchers have little control + observer bias?)
correlation (measurement of relationship between variables; NOT causation)
explanation variety = A → B; B → A; C → A & B (where X may affect X)
case study (study of one person; not generalized for others)
experiment (manipulation of independent variable + random participants + control group; strongest causal test)
isolates a proposed cause (independent variable)
developmental limitations = can’t manipulate harm, can’t assign age, quasi-experiments
measured outcome (dependent variable)
Developmental Designs
cross-sectional (diff. age groups tested at once at the same time)
longitudinal (same people tested repeatedly across time)
sequential (2 or more age cohorts repeatedly across time)
Design Challenges
cohort effects (experiences make age groups differ not due to age)
practice effects (repetition improves performance not due to development)
attrition (those who stay in the study may be more advantaged than those who leave)
time & cost
Context → Findings Interpretation
ethnography - researcher immersion of culture + context (leads to better understanding of study)
cross-cultural research - comparison of cultures (are patterns universal or do they depend on type of culture?)
participatory action research - community members collaborate with researchers
Ethics
protection from harm
confidentiality
consent & assent
integrity
Sampling (where generalizability depends on)
population (full group) or sample (smaller group of population)
context & representativeness matters !!
Conclusions
evidence → descriptive (supports observed characteristics etc.) & correlational (supports association of variables & predictability)
experiment (supports causal inference when indep. + dep. + randomness are present)
converging methods producing compatible findings = GOOD!