Bernthal Pg 171-175 Screening for SSD
Assessment of Velopharyngeal Function
Passavant's Pad
Present during sustained phonation in individuals, notably those with cleft palates (appears in ~1/3 of cases).
Its presence may indicate a compensatory mechanism, signaling potential velopharyngeal valving issues.
In surgical decisions (such as adenoidectomy), the need for adenoidal tissue for closure is considered.
Instrumental Measures for Assessment
Various instrumental methods supplement clinical assessments of velopharyngeal function.
Inadequate velopharyngeal function can lead to issues such as:
Hypernasal resonance
Weak production of pressured consonants (stops, fricatives, affricates)
Nasal air emission
Examples of assessment tools include:
Nasometer
Videofluoroscopy
Nasopharyngoscopy
Aerodynamic measures
The Role of the Tongue in Articulation
Importance of Tongue Movements
The tongue is a primary articulator capable of compensating for oral cavity variations.
Macroglossia: abnormally large tongue; historically associated with Down syndrome, but often the tongue size is normal in this population due to low muscle tone and small oral cavity (relative macroglossia).
Microglossia: abnormally small tongue; rarely causes speech issues.
Speech vs. Nonspeech Tongue Movements
Tongue movements for speech differ from nonspeech activities.
Protruding the tongue and lateral movements can reveal motor control issues.
Diadochokinetic Tasks
Involves rapid speech movements (e.g., /pA p^ pA/).
Syllable production rates may not correlate with articulatory proficiency unless there is a gross motor issue.
Focus should be on the pattern of movement and consistency in contacts during tasks.
Short Lingual Frenum
Can restrict tongue tip movement; however, most individuals can communicate effectively despite its length.
If the client can reach the alveolar ridge with the tongue tip, frenum length is likely appropriate; otherwise, surgical intervention might be assessed.
Options in Oral Cavity Examination
Considerations for clinicians noticing structural/function inadequacies contributing to speech errors:
Refer to other professionals (e.g., otolaryngologist, orthodontist, cleft palate team).
Engage in further observation and testing.
Provide compensatory or remedial instruction.
Audiological Screening
Purpose: To detect auditory function loss that may cause speech sound disorders (SSD).
Typically conducted prior to phonological assessment using:
Pure tone screening at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz, primarily at 20 dB HL (adjusted for ambient noise).
Impedance Audiometry: measures eardrum compliance and middle-ear pressure, providing insights on tympanic membrane function via acoustic reflex assessment.
Referral to an audiologist is recommended if screening fails.
Speech Sound Perception/Discrimination Testing
Historical Context: Early clinicians linked speech sound errors to perception issues.
Shift in Practice: General speech sound discrimination tests have become less common; focused assessments are favored now.
Speech Production-Perception Tasks
Two Approaches for Assessment:
Judgment Tasks
Involves presenting words for the child to judge their correctness based on their performance.
Contrast Testing
The child selects from two pictures which aligns with the spoken word, reflecting contrasts in sounds.
Effective Assessment Design
Identify target sounds, usual errors, and control sounds to construct specific auditory tests.
Analyze responses to assess perceptual abilities effectively.
Conclusion
Speech sound assessment includes both screening and comprehensive evaluations.
A comprehensive battery entails:
Connected speech and single-word sampling
Stimulability and contextual testing
Additional procedures like case history, oral cavity examination, audiological screening, and perceptual testing.
Data gathered is crucial for interpretation during subsequent evaluations.