The Design Argument - Reading

Part Two: Philosophy of Religion

Watch. Listen. Explore. Read.
Visit MySearchLab for additional resources, including readings, videos, podcasts, and research tools.
Complete your chapter study by engaging with topic-specific and chapter exam assessments available at www.mysearchlab.com.

Reading Selection: Thomas Aquinas, "Five Ways to Prove That God Exists," Pt. 1, Question 2, Art. 3 of Summa Theologiae.
- Task: As you read, compare Aquinas's arguments in the text to those presented in the chapter.
- Focus Question: Does Aquinas's formulation of any arguments significantly differ from the chapter's presentation?
Research Topics:
- Thomas Aquinas
- Arguments for the existence of God

Arguments for the Existence of God
- Traditional arguments: Cosmological, Design, and Ontological arguments.
- Aquinas's arguments (First, Second, Third Ways) are categorized as cosmological.
Focus on the Design Argument:
- Aquinas's fifth argument as an instance of the Argument from Design.
- Various forms of the design argument to be explored in this chapter.

Premise (1): Among objects that act for an end, some have minds, while others do not.
Premise (2): An object that acts for an end, but has no mind must have been designed by a being with a mind.
Conclusion: Therefore, there exists a being with a mind who designed all mindless objects that act for an end.
Conclusion Follow-Up: Hence, God exists.
Note: The transition from premise (2) to (3) incurs the Birthday Fallacy - suggesting that every mindless object requires a unique designer.

Understanding "Act for an End":
- Correlates to the concept of a goal-directed system.
- Example: A guided missile as a goal-directed system without a mind, functioning based on human design.
- Further examples include nonhuman organisms (e.g., bacteria) that exhibit survival behaviors, guided by an end of survival and reproduction.
- Historical Thought: Aquinas and Aristotle posited even inanimate objects have ends or purposes traditionally rejected by modern science.
- Teleology: The view that all things, living or non-living, should be examined as goal-directed systems, although this perspective contrasts with contemporary scientific understanding.

Definition: Cites general features of the universe, positing that these features result from intelligent design.
Example: Newton’s argument linking the simplicity of natural laws to the existence of an intelligent and perfect God.

Definition: Focuses on specific features of objects that are best explained by the hypothesis of intelligent design.
Example: Intricacies of living organisms that are goal-directed and complex systems.

Historical Context: Design arguments were prevalent in Great Britain during the 18th and 19th century, with many arguing for God's existence based on world observations.
William Paley's Argument (1743-1805):
- Formulation: Interpreted as an abductive argument rather than a deductively valid one.
- Watch Analogy:
  - Hypothetical scenario of finding a watch on a beach, leading to questions about its complexity and function.
  - Random Hypothesis: A watch formed accidentally through natural processes.
  - Design Hypothesis: The watch must be designed due to its complexity and functionality.
  - Plausibility Comparison: The Design Hypothesis is seen as more plausible than the Random Hypothesis due to its alignment with expected characteristics of a designed object.
  - Utilizes the Surprise Principle: Observations of a watch strongly favor the Design Hypothesis over the Random Hypothesis.

Common Sense Perspective: Paley aligns our common understanding of the watch's origin with the living world.
Organisms as Complex Designs: Living organisms exhibit more complexity than watches and are perfectly adapted to their environments.
Plausibility of Explanations: Similar to the watch, organisms likely resulted from a Design Hypothesis, suggesting a designer due to their intricacies.

Design Argument's Structure:
- Claims complexity and adaptation of living things imply intelligent design.
- Infers an unobserved entity (God) as the best explanation for observable complexities.
- Critique that hinges on scientific inquiry, which often operates on similar principles of inference.

Focus of Hume's Analysis: Hume might define design arguments as inductive or universally analogical, as opposed to abductive.

Hume criticizes the design argument based on the analogy between watches and the universe, viewing it as weak due to structural dissimilarities.
Constructs general formats for comparison, measuring similarity between analogs (e.g., watches) and targets (e.g., universe or organisms).
Evaluation: Hume's skepticism hinges on shared characteristics, although this may not undermine the abduction nature of the design argument.

Inductive Limits: Hume asserts that conclusions about the universe necessitate extensive observational samples supporting intelligent design.
Counter-Claim: The design argument is inherently abductive, not inductive, sidestepping Hume's critique regarding sample size limitations.
A contrast drawn through the example of Mendel's genetic hypothesis which relied on inference without direct observation.

Hume's critiques do not adequately discredit the design argument, suggesting it possesses merit despite the lack of flaw identification.
Consideration of Darwin's evolutionary theory as a contemporary alternative explaining life is left for subsequent discussion.

Define the design argument as an abductive argument.
Distinguish between global and local design arguments.
Explain the Surprise Principle's application in Paley's watch argument.
Describe Hume's principle regarding the strength of analogy arguments.
Analyze Hume's two criticisms of the design argument and their relevance to the argument's abductive nature.

Examine the implications of indirect observations of design (human watchmakers vs. divine entities) on the design argument's strength.
Discuss the distinction between assigning functions to biological and inanimate systems.
Reflect on Hume’s claim regarding the limitations of the design argument to establish characteristics of the designer, assessing how this affects the argument's validity.