PBPL 1: Intro to Public Policy Analysis
Instructor: Andy Crosby, PhD
Winter 2025: Week 7B
Office hours change:
Tuesdays: 2:30 - 4:30 PM
Thursdays: 2 - 3 PM
Meeting #1 grades have been posted.
Note on upcoming Exam 2:
Class will not meet on Thursday, February 27
Study guide discussed on Tuesday, February 25
More application-heavy questions on Exam 2 and 3 (e.g., surveys, cost-benefit analysis).
Discusses the role of public meetings in policy analysis.
Continues from previous weeks with tools for policy analysis.
Cost per gallon: $3.50
$2 ingredients, $0.50 labor, $1 maintenance
Benefit (Selling Price): $10
Net Benefit: $10 - $3.50 = $6.50
Compare Option 1 (Status Quo) with Option 2 (New Speakers).
Net Benefits Calculation:
Option 1: Costs $10,000, Benefits $12,000 → Net Benefit = $2,000
Option 2: Costs $10,000, Benefits $8,600 → Net Benefit = -$1,400
Option 1 Ratio: 12000/10000 = 1.2 (Profitable)
Option 2 Ratio: 8600/10000 = 0.86 (Not profitable)
Competition only pool
Competition and recreation pools
Recreation only pool
Option 1: $8,967,689
Option 2: $8,030,032
Option 3: $10,918,432
Site Plan Option 1: Revenues and expenses projected over 5 years show significant net losses.
Comparison Table: Evaluating revenues and operating expenses for each option.
Combine competition and recreation programming.
Proceed with Site Plan Option 2 for its balanced development cost.
Evaluate a joint venture with the Davis Joint Unified School District for better cost recovery.
Considers factors beyond efficiency (e.g., political feasibility, fairness).
Identify criteria, weight them, and score options.
Case studies on transit projects in Calgary demonstrate how MAA aids fund allocation and investment decisions.
Sensitivity Analysis: Review results based on assumption changes to gauge robustness.
Understand policy analysis and basic cost-benefit analysis principles.
Prepare for further discussions on policy tools.