114 notes
The Process of Becoming a Better Writer
Question on Improvement
Inquiry: How does one become a better writer?
Answer: Writing repeatedly (a form of self-practice).
Nature of Writing
No shortcuts to good writing; it requires effort and often involves pain.
Contrast between admiration for a writer's work vs. understanding of their extensive practice.
Completion of drafts and seeking improvement are key steps.
Draft and Peer Review Process
Students are encouraged to complete drafts thoroughly.
Emphasis on distance: After completing a draft, wait before revising to gain perspective.
Peer Review Assignment:
Introduced as a strategy to enhance writing via feedback.
Designed like a rubric that evaluates essays through specific categories.
Students are to apply this rubric while reviewing a partner's work and vice versa.
Importance of reviewing the assignment prior to writing (student feedback).
Importance of Deadlines
Challenges posed by scheduling around holidays (e.g., Thanksgiving).
Discussion on Slavery and the Constitution
Cover Topics Before Transitioning
Discussion prompt about slavery: Are there any questions before this topic?
Note on meeting schedule and setting expectations for the class.
Abolitionist Movements of the 1840s
Overview of debates among abolitionists, especially the mainstream figures like William Lloyd Garrison.
Garrison and his publication, "The Liberator," significantly impacting abolitionist discourse.
His belief in the moral suasion: Educating the public on accountability concerning slavery.
Constitutional Connections to Slavery
Argument that all states, including free states, were complicit in slavery through constitutional support.
Garrison's emphasis on the constitutional framework reinforcing slaveholding.
Constitutional Provisions Discussed
Article One, Section Nine:
Discusses importation of persons and the implications for slavery.
Commentary on the language used: "Such persons" implies dehumanization (e.g., persons trafficked like commodities).
Article Four, Section Two:
Outlines obligations regarding fugitive slaves indicating widespread societal participation in slavery.
Legal ramifications for citizens serving as slave catchers, leading to moral implications for all Americans.
Three-Fifths Compromise:
Describes how slaves counted for representation in Congress, giving southern slave-holding states more political power.
Discusses motivations behind this compromise emphasizing representation for property owners.
Ethical Implications
Understanding varied perspectives on slavery, including radical abolitionists vs. more conservative abolitionists.
Demonstrating the complexities of anti-slavery sentiments from both moral and economic angles.
Historical Perspectives from Founding Fathers
Analysis of Founding Fathers’ Views
Investigation into notes from the Constitutional Convention reveals deep-rooted issues with slavery.
Reference to Butler’s claims about property value and government’s purpose prioritizing property protection.
Comparison regarding societal equality vs. property-based representation.
Absence of Explicitness
Noting the lack of the term "slavery" in the Constitution prior to the Thirteenth Amendment, highlighting historical hypocrisy.
Speculation about motives behind avoiding direct mention of slavery in early documents as a PR measure.
Legal Philosophies and Natural Law Theory
Lysander Spooner’s Views
Spooner's argument claiming that the Constitution makes slavery unconstitutional based on natural law principles.
Distinction between legal positivism (law based on power) vs. natural law (law based on moral reasoning).
Key distinctions laid out on the definitions and nature of law and justice.
Justice and Law
Spooner’s assertion that true law is just, rooted in human morals, not merely a product of power structures.
Critique of judges operating under legal positivism without moral consideration.
Relationships in Legal Contract
Analysis of contracts formed under unlawful terms and implications for valid law.
Spooner argues all contracts directed towards injustice are void, reinforcing natural law principles.
Final Implications
Discussion on how laws can be rendered invalid under natural rights theory if aimed against justice.
Emphasis on legal relationships that prioritize property over people, especially in the context of slavery.
Historical Relevance and Modern Implications
Current Relevance of Historical Debates
Comparison of historical controversies around slavery to modern issues of rights and government obligations.
The importance of recognizing past injustices and how they inform current legal and ethical discussions.
Philosophical Arguments
Idea that a contract becomes invalid if formulated upon injustice, with a direct link to contemporary discussions on rights.
Legacy of abolitionist thought and its place within contemporary legal and political theory.