Structuralism
1950s-1960s
Heavily influenced by structural linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure
signifier/signified → relation arbitrary
langue vs. parole
Meaning is relational: language is system of differences → Signs do not carry meaning but they gain meaning through system of relations and oppositions
paradigmatic chain and binary oppositions
Structuralist approach:
world/reality consists of sign systems and reality is an effect of language → language produces reality
language does not represent world as it really is → Meaning is not universal or natural but the product of shared systems of signification
Structuralist view of literature
literary text is construct whose internal structures need to be understood in context of larger signifying system of which it is a part (e.g. genre)
no interest in what is debated in literature or how → focus on how meaning is produced within signifying system
Structuralist methods and approaches:
Studying shared structure between texts by placing them in context of larger structure (literature as langue, individual text as parole)
Study of structures within a text: binary oppositions, contrasts, echoes, parallels, relationship between plot and subplot
Study of narratological features: narrative situations, focalization, …