Formulation
Diagnosis ≠ Formulation
Applicable to many disorders, seminar example is ASD
Autism: a brief overview
Global prevalence approx. 1 in 100 children (for diagnosis)
Triad of impairment or 2-domain approach → social communication and restricted behaviour pattern
Psycho-educational, developmental and behavioural interventions are the core interventions
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is typically:
In young childhood
Or older children upwards when social demands exceed capacity to cope
More boys receive diagnosis
Can take many years for diagnosis
Lots of unknowns, stereotypes and co-morbidity ext.
Often put on the scale low to high functioning
Constant change and debate in what language should be used when discussing autism e.g. functioning labels, person first language, words such as disorder, notions of disability ext. → can depend on context and individuals who are being referred to.
A typical assessment
ADI-R standardised semi-structured clinical review for parents/ care givers; questions scored on clinician’s judgement
Quality of social interaction
Communication and lang
sensory interests and stimming
Medical history
Observations at school/home/social play groups ext.
plus ADOS
Formulation
Core skill of profession of clinical psychology and appears in the regulatory requirements of counselling, health and forensics
Can be alternative to diagnosis but more often sits alongside
Used to develop/ clarify hypotheses
Advantages
Person-centred
acknowledges that human experience does not come in neat parcels
Supports the person to take control of their own narrative
Responds to the criticisms that diagnosis can sometimes be
deterministic and rigid
slow
lack in reliability and validity
socially-situated
distressful for person/ families
can cause stigma
Aims
Resist expert judgement
Draw out the persons strengths and challenges in context
Avoid individualising (this only happens to you) and pathologizing
Foci on the role of trauma and abuse in psychological presentation
Be flexible

The five P’s of case formulation
Presenting problem - what do the person, family and clinician consider to be the issue?
Predisposing factors - what biological environmental and psychological factors put this person more at risk?
Precipitating factors - what significant events happened before this issue becoming a problem?
Perpetuating factors - what maintains the issue?
Protective factors - what support and resources does the individual have that are helping with this issue?