Chinese Communist Revolution – Detailed Lecture Notes

Copyright Notice

  • Opening legal disclaimer: material reproduced under Australian National University licence, referring to Section 113P of the Australian Copyright Act 1968.
  • Students warned not to further reproduce or distribute.

Comparative Lens: Communist Revolutions in Asia

  • Soviet‐imposed success: North Korea.
  • Vietnamese support: Laos.
  • Large parties that failed: Malayan Communist Party, Indonesian Communist Party (once 3rd largest worldwide, now extinct).
  • Central analytic question for China: Why did the CCP succeed when others did not?

Popular Explanations vs. Lecture Argument

  • CCP’s own narrative: victory through Maoist guerrilla warfare.
  • Lecturer/Andrew Walder: guerrilla tactics kept CCP alive but did not win the war.
    • Final success owed to:
      • Conventional battles (esp. in Manchuria).
      • Urban mobilisation in industrial Northeast.
      • Large-scale mass mobilisation in countryside.
  • Mass-mobilisation ethos carries into PRC economic & political campaigns (Great Leap Forward steel drive, Xi Jinping’s current mobilisation style).

Four Sub-Periods after CCP Founding (Republican Era)

  1. “Great Revolution” / 1st United Front (1921-1927)
  2. Nanjing Decade (1927-1937).
  3. War of Resistance / 2nd United Front (1937-1945).
  4. Civil War leading to 1949.

First United Front & Soviet Investment

  • 1921: CCP founded; 13 delegates, ≈ 50 members; venue now tourist site in Shanghai (near Xintiandi).
  • Early CCP leaders (Li Dazhao, Chen Duxiu) even skipped the Congress – convened only because Comintern required it.
  • Early membership split: domestic intellectuals vs. work-study students in Europe (e.g., Deng Xiaoping in France).
  • French Concession police discovery forced move to Jiaxing boat to finish Congress.

What Is Communism? Key Tenets Explained

  • Ownership: abolition of private ownership of means of production; personal possessions allowed (gray zones: car vs. truck).
  • Distribution: quote from Marx “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”\text{“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”}
  • Ideal of unlimited productivity -> abundance.
  • Real-world partial analogues: Australian Medicare, social insurance schemes.

Chinese Intellectual & Cultural Resonances

  • Ancient “Well-Field” system (井田制): shared central plot, egalitarian ideal (likely mythical).
  • Kang Youwei, Datong Shu (Book of Grand Unity): no private property, admired by young Mao.
  • Western analogue: Henry George (land value tax) → influenced Sun Yat-sen’s Three Principles, explains persistent high land tax in Taiwan.

Disillusionment with the West after WWI & May Fourth

  • Versailles & Shandong decision shattered faith in Wilsonian self-determination.
  • Turn toward nationalism & communism.
  • 1918-19 Work-Study wave to France: promise of jobs after Chinese Labour Corps; war ended, jobs gone → students (Deng Xiaoping) forced into harsh factory work → radicalisation, joining young Communists.

Russian Revolution & Soviet Courtship

  • 1917 events understood vaguely as workers/soldiers Soviets (even Li Dazhao imagined near-anarchism).
  • Karakhan Manifesto (1919): promised to renounce czarist privileges; huge symbolic boon.
  • Comintern line: CCP should enter KMT as a bloc to reshape it (Bolshevik model).

Whampoa Military Academy & Soviet Advice

  • Founded Guangzhou suburb, funded/armed by USSR.
  • Goal: ideological, party-loyal officers vs. personalistic warlords.
  • Chiang Kai-shek as commandant; Soviet advisor Blücher ("Galen") military, Borodin political.

Sun Yat-sen’s Revised Three Principles (1924)

  • Nationalism now = anti-imperialism (targeting British, French, U.S., Japanese privileges).
  • Logic: defeat warlords who served foreign powers.

Northern Expedition & KMT–CCP Split

  • Revolutionary Army better trained/equipped; warlords weak.
  • Peasant uprisings (Hubei/Hunan) alienated KMT officer-landlord class → 1927 purge, Shanghai massacre; CCP nearly destroyed.

Nanjing Decade (1927-37) – KMT View

  • Nominal unification but real power only Zhejiang–Jiangsu core.
  • Warlord autonomy persists; grassroots cadre base gutted by 1927 purge.
  • Economic strides: light-industry boom, especially textiles in Yangzi Delta (by 1935 Chinese cloth competitive vs. Japanese).
  • German advisers, re-armament; Nazi ideology admired by some KMT figures.
  • Growing Japanese threat: 19311931 Mukden → Manchukuo puppet state; 1937 full invasion.

CCP Strategic Pivot to Peasants

  • Urban workers tiny minority: 3 million of 400 million\le 3\text{ million of }400\text{ million} population.
  • Mao’s 1923 Hunan observations + Peng Pai’s Guangdong peasant bases inspired rural focus.
  • Created 13 Soviets; largest = Jiangxi Central Soviet.

Jiangxi Soviet (1931-34)

  • Radical land reform: execution/expulsion of landlords, equal plots to peasants.
  • Imported Soviet institutions – secret police (State Political Directorate), slogans: “Guard the red regime, punish class enemy.”
  • Cultural Revolution-era museum aesthetics testify to legacy.

Why Landlords Targeted?

  • University enrolment data (James Lee et al.): urban businessmen, professionals, officials far wealthier than rural landlords, but peasants knew only landlords, not capitalists/foreigners; land inequality easiest mobilisation frame.

Encirclement Campaigns & the Long March

  • KMT German-trained army’s 5th campaign tightened blockhouses; Jiangxi resources exhausted (whole counties conscripted).
  • Oct 1934–Oct 1935: Long March from Jiangxi → Guizhou (Zunyi Meeting rehabilitates Mao) → northern Shaanxi; 80{,}000 \to <10{,}000 survivors (≈ 95%95\% loss).
  • Search for Soviet aid via Mongolia/Xinjiang failed; still, base established at Yan’an.

Xi’an Incident (Dec 1936)

  • Warlord Zhang Xueliang (Manchurian troops) kidnaps Chiang Kai-shek; motive: form anti-Japanese United Front, seek USSR help.
  • Zhou Enlai negotiates; Chiang released, Zhang house-arrested for life; CCP saved from annihilation.

Second United Front & War of Resistance (1937-45)

  • 1937 Marco Polo Bridge – total war.
  • KMT retreats to Wuhan then Chongqing; power in southwest.
  • 1940s stalemate; CCP exploits Japanese/KMT vacuum in North China plains.

Administrative Subcontracting Legacy

  • Japanese garrison cities/railways; CCP operates in rural “gaps.”
  • Communication obstacles (costly telegraph with four-digit Chinese codes, scarce radios) → high decentralisation; local commanders granted autonomy (“山头” mountaintops).
  • Seeds of PRC’s later “centralised yet locally discretionary” governance.

Expansion Metrics

  • 1937 CCP: <10,00010{,}000 troops, tiny Shaanxi base.
  • 1945 CCP: 1 M1\text{ M} regulars + 3 M3\text{ M} militia, 1 M km21\text{ M km}^2 territory, >1 M1\text{ M} party members.

Yan’an Rectification Movement (1941-44)

  • Purpose:
    1. Purge Moscow-loyal “dogmatists” (Wang Ming).
    2. Ideological unification under Mao.
  • Methods: study groups, forced self-criticism, interrogation of “spies,” literary propaganda.
  • Rise of key allies:
    Liu Shaoqi (later PRC Chairman).
    Gao Gang (Shenyang base baron).

Seventh Party Congress (Apr 1945)

  • Delegates from Shandong needed 6 months to reach Yan’an; shows logistical limits.
  • Mao Zedong Thought enshrined as sole guiding ideology; Mao uncontested leader.

1945–46 KMT–CCP Negotiations & Breakdown

  • USSR model (as in E-Europe): push for coalition government; Stalin urges Mao to Chongqing.
  • U.S. Ambassador Patrick Hurley mediates Chiang–Mao talks; surface smiles, mutual distrust.
  • Both sides re-arm; neither wants genuine power-sharing.

Race for Manchuria

  • August 1945: Mao orders Lin Biao et al. to seize Northeast ahead of KMT (walked there lacking winter gear).
  • Soviet Red Army occupies region, hands Japanese weapons to CCP despite Allied agreement.
  • Strategic value: heavy industry, rails, Sov-NK rear bases (Dalian lease).
  • Sets stage for conventional battles that decide Civil War.

Broader Significance & Contemporary Echoes

  • Mass-mobilisation faith persists: GLF, Cultural Revolution, Xi era campaign style.
  • Administrative decentralisation within party hierarchy still shapes centre-local relations.
  • Rural land politics → continuous sensitivity about property rights, taxation, and “common prosperity.”