Psychosocial Development – Temperament
Introduction to Temperament
Temperament = the newborn’s “personality” (pre-personality)
Characteristic mood
Typical activity level
Modes of responding to environmental stimuli
Considered one of the earliest observable pieces of psychosocial development, often examined as a precursor to attachment security.
Central questions raised in the lecture:
How stable is temperament over the life span?
Does early temperament predict later behavioural or personality outcomes?
How do genetic factors interact with cultural/parenting environments to shape temperament?
Thomas & Chess Longitudinal Study (Classic Work)
Design
Followed a birth cohort from infancy (≈ months) through adolescence (≈ years).
Longitudinal approach allowed within-child comparisons across time.
Core finding
Temperament at months was largely predictive of temperament at years.
Provided empirical support for temperamental stability.
Resulting typology (3 broad styles, still influential):
Easy Babies
Cheerful, positive affect
Regular sleep/eat patterns
Low fussiness; high adaptability to change
Prevalence: ≈ of infants
Slow-to-Warm-Up Babies
Less overtly cheerful
Moderately irregular biological rhythms
More easily upset; show cautious or inhibited approach to novelty
Lower adaptability
Prevalence: ≈
Difficult Babies
Generally glum/irritable mood
Highly irregular sleep/eating, erratic behaviour
High resistance to change; intense negative reaction to novelty
Prevalence: ≈
Remaining : Not cleanly classifiable; may show a mosaic of traits or shift categories across contexts/time.
Percentages are population averages, not absolute; individual variance expected.
Stability & Predictive Power of Early Temperament
Evidence (including Thomas & Chess, later replication studies)
Early temperament → later personality profiles.
Predicts cognitive performance (e.g., attention span, persistence on tasks).
Forecasts peer relationship quality and social competence.
Associated with risk for conduct disorder, substance use, and adolescent drug taking.
Outcome gradient
\text{Easy} > \text{Slow-to-Warm-Up} > \text{Difficult} across most life-course domains (academic, social, behavioural health).
Cultural Influences on Temperament
Temperament emerges from gene × environment interactions—culture shapes the environmental side.
Kyrios et al. (1989) – Greek-Australian vs Anglo-Australian Infants
Location: Multicultural Melbourne (largest Greek immigrant community in Australia at the time).
Method
Matched groups on age, family income, parental education, health status, etc.
Findings
Greek-Australian infants more likely to show a difficult temperament relative to matched Anglo peers:
More negative mood/approach
Lower adaptability
Less distractibility (harder to soothe)
Lower positive affect
Implication: Child-rearing beliefs/practices tied to cultural background can nudge temperamental expression.
Note: Demographic landscape has changed; replication today might yield different outcomes.
Friedman (Earlier Study) – Aboriginal vs Anglo-Australian Newborns
Aboriginal newborns compared with Anglo-Australian newborns.
Aboriginal infants were:
More quietly alert (calm attentiveness)
Less tense/irritable
Happier & more responsive to cuddling
Better at self-soothing after crying episodes
Suggests cultural or prenatal environmental factors foster early regulatory capacities.
Recent Longitudinal Comparison – Indigenous vs Non-Indigenous Infants
Newer research tracks infants over time rather than single snapshots.
Result: Similar temperament structures between groups, specifically regarding
Social interaction style,
Persistence,
Reactivity to people & objects.
Interpretation: Cultural effects may evolve with societal change; earlier differences may diminish or manifest differently across generations.
Overarching Conclusions & Exam-Relevant Points
Temperament is the earliest discernible facet of personality; most infants can be grouped into Easy, Slow-to-Warm-Up, or Difficult.
Stability: Substantial continuity from months-old infancy through at least middle childhood (≈ years), and predictive signals extend into adolescence.
Outcomes: Early temperament forecasts later personality traits, cognitive abilities, social competence, and behavioural health risks.
Cultural/Environmental Modifiers
Parenting style, caregiving routines, disciplinary practices, and broader cultural values shape the observable expression of temperamental traits.
Evidence indicates both cross-cultural differences and changes over historical time.
Nature + Nurture: Research consensus = temperament reflects genetic predispositions modulated by environment (e.g., parenting, cultural norms).
Upcoming topic (teaser): How parenting interacts with temperament to influence attachment and subsequent psychosocial development.