CJS Chapter 1 12-22
Chapter 1: Crime and Criminal Justice
Investigation
Purpose of Criminal Investigation
Systematic gathering of evidence to identify suspects and build cases for legal arrests.
Duration and complexity can vary:
Quick apprehensions during a crime in progress.
Long-term investigations (e.g., Dennis Rader - BTK killer, 1974-2005; Gary Ridgway - Green River killer, 1982-2001).
Key Activities in Investigations
Interviewing Victims and Witnesses:
Collect firsthand accounts to reconstruct events and identify potential suspects.
Canvassing Neighborhoods:
Searching nearby areas for additional witnesses with crucial information.
Securing Crime Scenes:
Preserving evidence is vital; includes:
Weapons
Bodily fluids
Fingerprints
Other biological materials linking suspects to the crime.
Handling Evidence
Critical for maintaining integrity:
Careful collection, recording, classification, processing, and storage.
Proper procedures ensure the chain of evidence is maintained to avoid inadmissibility in court.
Arrest
Legal Conditions for Arrest
Must have:
Probable cause of a crime.
Evidence linking the individual to the crime.
Voluntary surrender of freedom from the suspect's perspective.
In-Presence Requirement
Generally, officers must witness misdemeanors:
Exceptions exist, e.g., domestic violence.
Arrest Warrant
Issued by a magistrate:
Requires law enforcement to show sufficient evidence of probable cause.
Custody
Post-Arrest Procedures
Procedures include:
Search for Evidence:
Searching the suspect and immediate area.
Conduct Interrogations:
Must follow Miranda rights during questioning.
Facilitate Eyewitness Identifications:
Conducting lineups or showups.
Miranda Warning
Established by Miranda v. Arizona:
Suspects informed of their rights:
Right to remain silent.
Right to legal counsel.
Charging
Prosecutor's Role
Determines whether to formally charge based on:
Sufficiency of evidence.
Particulars of the case influencing prosecution priorities.
Nolle Prosequi
Legal motion to drop a case due to:
Insufficient evidence.
Witness reliability issues.
Preliminary Hearing/Grand Jury
Grand Jury Function:
Jurors hear accusations to determine if there is enough evidence for charges.
Preliminary Hearing:
Open hearing for defendants to dispute claims; sufficiency of evidence leads to trial.
Arraignment
Process
Formal charges read; defendant must enter plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest).
Bail options considered for release while awaiting trial.
Bail/Detention
Primary purpose to ensure appearance at trial:
Inability to pay bail leads to continued custody.
Plea Bargaining
Negotiation Process
Common practice; approximately 90% resolved before trial:
Defense negotiates for guilty plea to lesser charges or leniency.
Trial/Adjudication
Trial Process
Conducted by judge or jury:
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Sentencing/Disposition
Consequences upon conviction may include:
Fines
Probation
Incarceration
Death penalty (in severe cases).
Appeal/Postconviction Remedies
Appeals
Defendants can file appeals if there are:
Violation of rights.
Legal errors affecting verdict.
Correctional Treatment
Post-Sentencing
Offenders typically enter correctional facilities for:
Rehabilitation programs to facilitate reintegration into society.
Release
Early release through:
Parole
Executive pardons, allowing for supervised community service.
Postrelease
Offenders may transition to community correctional centers for support and supervision.
The Criminal Justice Assembly Line
Herbert Packer's Model
Visual representation of the justice process as an assembly line:
Cases progress through various decision points reflecting a routinized approach.
Effect of Errors
Procedural errors can cause:
Wrongful imprisonment of the innocent.
Release of dangerous offenders.
Perspectives on Justice
Crime Control Perspective
Advocates for tough sanctions to deter crime.
Emphasizes efficiency and effectiveness for public safety.
Rehabilitation Perspective
Views crime as a result of social inequalities:
Supports opportunities and support for offenders to address root causes.
Due Process Perspective
Ensures fairness and protection of rights for accused individuals:
Legal processes must operate without discrimination.
Nonintervention Perspective
Advocates for minimal interference from justice agencies:
Supports diversion programs and decriminalization for better societal outcomes.