****050 - The War on Terror Begins
US National Security Overview
Dr. Jason Brownlee, University of Texas at Austin
Lecture 050 focuses on the implications of 9/11 and subsequent policies.
Key Topics and Concepts
US Policies and Actions
AUMF (Authorization to Use Military Force)
Established on September 18, 2001, as a direct response to the September 11 attacks.
Operation Enduring Freedom
Launched as military action against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
Important Figures
George W. Bush: President during the September 11 attacks.
Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky: Psychologists known for their work on decision-making under uncertainty.
Warren Christopher & Sandy Berger: Key figures in U.S. foreign policy.
Public and Political Reactions
Public Reaction to September 11: Shock and disbelief, leading to support for military action.
Extent of al-Qaeda Capabilities: Concern over terrorist capabilities and planning.
Casualty Aversion: Public sensitivity to military casualties affecting support for actions.
"Pretty Prudent" Public: General wariness towards war and military engagement.
UNSC and NATO Responses
UN Security Council Resolution 1368 (September 12, 2001): Condemns terrorist attacks and recognizes the right to self-defense. Noted that it was not a formal authorization for war.
NATO Article 5: Invoked for collective defense in response to 9/11 attacks.
The Psychological Impact of 9/11
System 1 vs. System 2 Thinking:
System 1: Fast, subconscious, automatic, error-prone.
System 2: Slow, conscious, effortful, more reliable.
Affects decision-making processes in crisis settings.
Timeline of Events Post-9/11
9/11: Terror attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
9/12: NATO invokes Article 5; UNSC passes resolution condemning attacks.
9/14: President Bush visits the WTC site.
9/18: AUMF against September 11 terrorists and backers passed.
9/20: Declaration of "war on terror."
10/2: NATO confirms Article 5 invocation.
10/7: Operation Enduring Freedom begins with airstrikes in Afghanistan.
Key Quotes from Leaders
President George W. Bush (September 20, 2001): Emphasized the enemy is a radical network of terrorists, not Muslims or Arabs.
Recognized that any nation supporting terrorism will be treated as a hostile regime.
Noted that current warfare would not resemble previous wars with quick conclusions.
Public Opinion and War Mobilization
Casualty Aversion: Research indicates public support for military operations significantly drops with increased casualties.
Significant differences between elite decision-makers and public opinion on foreign interventions involving troop deployments.
The Foreign Policy Disconnect
Persistent disagreement on foreign policy priorities between U.S. leaders and public,
Ordinary Americans prioritize security and economic stability, while elites may focus on broader geopolitical considerations.
Support for Intervention by Country (Historical Data)
Describe public support for military interventions across conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and others.
Use of figures to illustrate varying levels of public support for military action in different contexts.
Conclusion
Understanding the nuances of public opinion and policy decisions shaped by events like September 11 is crucial for future U.S. national security strategies.