Class Notes Ch 16
Module Overview
FIN 4303 Investment Strategies
Focus on Factor Investing
Key concepts and implementation strategies outlined in Chapter 16
History of Alpha
Focus on how stock market picks have evolved:
Importance of stock picker returns
Historical Context
Evolution of Alpha
Comparing absolute return versus stock picker skills:
Idiosyncratic risk as a key driver
Idiosyncratic risk is specific to individual assets and contributes to unsystematic risk.
Example: A company's stock performance remains unassociated with the broader market trends.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Developed by William Sharpe in 1964
A single-factor model focused on relative performance
Formula:
Actual Return = Risk-free Rate + Beta x Market Risk Premium + Alpha
Alpha = Actual Return - (Risk-free Rate + Beta x Market Risk Premium)
Market Risk Premium defined as Market Return - Risk-free Rate
Development of Additional Factors
Limitations of CAPM:
Access to information parallels among investors
Behavioral biases absent among investors
Risk assumptions are static (e.g., betas constant and returns normally distributed)
Discovery of “alternative betas” to address CAPM limitations
Understanding Factors
Key Factors in Investment
Stock Picker's Performance Evaluation:
CAPM evaluates stock performance contributions from the broad market and individual selection
Comparison of performance contributions:
Factors contribute to stock selection returns, impacting fee structures and evaluations of stock picker success
Investment Factors Overview
Main Factors Identified:
Value
Size
Momentum
Low Volatility
Profitability/Quality
Value Factor
Introduced by Fama and French (1992):
Cost-effectiveness of cheaper stocks outperforming expensive counterparts
Key metrics: Market Value to Book Value comparison
Historical performance: Strong pre-2007-08, inconsistent thereafter
Size Factor
Findings by Banz (1981) and Fama and French (1992):
Smaller firms typically yield higher returns than larger counterparts
Measured via SMB (Small Minus Big)
Investment risk characteristics differ due to leverage and volatility
Momentum Factor
Research by Jegadesh and Titman (1993), Carhart (1997):
Performance trends persist (both good and bad)
Performance measure UMD (Up Minus Down), focused on prior 12 months
Psychological factors impacting behavior: anchoring bias, herding, FOMO
a### Low Volatility Factor
Studies conducted by Ang et al. (2006):
Low-volatility stocks show higher performance relative to high-volatility stocks
Investment dynamics: High volatility stocks may signal higher risks
Historical track record remains positive, with a decreasing premium
Profitability/Quality Factor
Contributions by Fama and French (2006), Novy-Marx (2013):
Higher profitability in firms correlates with superior performance
Examination of sustainable earnings versus unsustainable growth
Variability in track record due to definitions of “quality”
Implementation Strategies
Portfolio Design Considerations
Challenges in defining "cheap" versus "expensive" stocks
Weighing sector or industry considerations in factor investing
Multifactor Portfolio Construction:
Combining single-factor portfolios to counteract cyclicity
Top-down vs. Bottom-up strategies combining factors
Summary & Rationale for Factor Existence
Investigating the pervasiveness of factors across markets and time
Assessing the rationale behind factor performance
Evaluating investability of factors considering liquidity, transaction costs, and management fees
Examples of Factor ETFs
iShares MSCI USA Momentum (MTUM)
FLEXSHARES MORNINGSTAR U.S. MARKET FACTOR TILT INDEX FUND