PLO Factions and Leadership

PLO Factions Overview

  • Major factions within the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) include:

    • Fatah

    • Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)

    • Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP)

    • Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC)

Fatah

  • Leader: Yasser Arafat

    • Known as the primary face of the Palestinian movement.

  • Aims/Goals:

    • Palestinian self-determination, led by Palestinians themselves.

    • Shift the focus of the struggle from reliance on Arab states to an independent Palestinian movement.

    • Pursue a long-term goal of liberation, with an increasing openness to political settlements.

  • Actions to Achieve Goals:

    • Initially involved in guerrilla warfare during the 1960s, marking its military approach.

    • Engaged in diplomatic outreach to the United Nations and Arab states.

    • Played a leading role in moving the PLO toward gaining international recognition.

  • Impact on PLO’s Overall Goals:

    • Strengthened the unity of the movement by asserting Fatah’s dominance in PLO leadership.

    • Advanced the PLO's transformation towards a diplomatic resolution and the eventual establishment of a two-state framework.

    • Enhanced the international legitimacy of the PLO, especially with gaining UN observer status in 1974.

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)

  • Leader: George Habash

    • A key figure promoting militant actions and opposing Western influence.

  • Aims/Goals:

    • Total liberation of all of Palestine.

    • Opposition to Western imperialism and moderate, conciliatory solutions for peace.

  • Actions to Achieve Goals:

    • Orchestrated high-profile militant operations, including airplane hijackings between 1968 and 1970.

    • Formed alliances with global revolutionary movement to garner support.

    • Took a vocal stance against Fatah’s shift towards diplomatic negotiations.

  • Impact on PLO’s Overall Goals:

    • Increased the global visibility of the Palestinian cause, showcasing militant resistance.

    • Damaged the diplomatic credibility of the PLO; PFLP's radical approach created a contrasting image.

    • Created internal pressures within the PLO against reaching compromises, thus fostering division.

    • Strengthened the radical ideological identity within the PLO, setting a counter-narrative.

Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP)

  • Leader: Nayef Hawatmeh

    • Advocated for more moderated approaches within the PLO framework.

  • Aims/Goals:

    • Liberation of Palestine more broadly.

    • Emphasized acceptance of partial political solutions, advocating for a state within the West Bank and Gaza.

  • Actions to Achieve Goals:

    • Conducted limited military operations while focusing on political education.

    • Engaged in publications to spread their ideology and built a student movement.

    • Advocated for a “phased strategy” that aimed to achieve goals progressively within the PLO.

  • Impact on PLO’s Overall Goals:

    • Encouraged the PLO to pursue more realistic political strategies, allowing for partial agreements.

    • Provided ideological justification for two-state solutions or phased approaches, facilitating negotiation openings.

    • Served as a moderating influence between the more militant stances of Fatah and PFLP.

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC)

  • Leader: Ahmed Jibril

    • Known for promoting highly militant approaches and close ties with Syria.

  • Aims/Goals:

    • Total liberation of all of Palestine without compromise.

    • A strong rejection of any political compromises.

    • Support of Syrian regional interests, aligning their goals with broader Syrian strategies.

  • Actions to Achieve Goals:

    • Engaged in highly militant operations, with a focus on cross-border attacks.

    • Aligned closely with Syria for vital support, including funding and training.

    • Refused to participate in diplomatic initiatives altogether.

  • Impact on PLO’s Overall Goals:

    • Contributed to increased factional fragmentation within the broader PLO landscape.

    • Undermined the autonomy of the PLO due to Syrian influence over the PFLP-GC’s operations.

    • Obstructed progress toward diplomatic and political resolutions, contrasting with other factions' efforts.

    • Helped to solidify the portrayal of the PLO as a divided entity, complicating unified Palestinian representation.