Lecture 4: Market Trading Logic, Equilibrium Stability, and Comparative Statics

University Copyright and Legal Notice

This material is made available by or on behalf of the University of Melbourne under section 113 p of the Copyright Act 1968.
The content may be subject to copyright; students and users are directed to the university copyright website for further information.

The Fundamental Logic of Trade and the Indifference Assumption

Trade logic represents the rational foundation behind when exchanges occur and the logic governing those trades.
Unlike barter systems (such as the fictional scenario of Len and Sheldon splitting household chores), market trade involves money changing hands, where the price acts as the connecting factor between parties.
The Indifference Assumption: For the sake of communicating logic in this subject, it is assumed that when a buyer or seller is indifferent (i.e., the price exactly matches their valuation or opportunity cost), they will always choose to say "yes" to the trade.
- This is a simplifying assumption underlying tutorial exercises and does not necessarily reflect empirical truth.
- Assuming the "yes" option prevents the ambiguity of a participant being able to do both (trading or not trading).

Market Equilibrium vs. Trade Logic

Individual Trade Logic:
- A buyer trades if their personal valuation of the good clears (is greater than or equal to) the price ( $V \ge P$ ).
- A seller trades if the market price clears their opportunity cost of producing the good ( $P \ge OC$ ).
Market Equilibrium:
- Equilibrium considers demand and supply functions representing collective willingness and ability to buy and sell.
- Both sides of the market must agree on a single price that clears the market.
- At the equilibrium price ( $P^*$ ) and quantity ( $Q^*$ ), buyers have purchased all they wanted and sellers have sold all they wanted.
- The market clears at the intersection of the demand and supply curves.

Stability of Equilibrium: The Logic of Selection

At equilibrium ( $P^*$ ), the following conditions must hold:
- Demand side: Any individual with a valuation higher than $P^*$ (V > P^*) must have purchased the product. Anyone with a valuation below $P^*$ (V < P^*) should not have obtained the product.
- Supply side: Any seller with an opportunity cost lower than $P^*$ (OC < P^*) should have sold the product. Any seller with an opportunity cost higher than $P^*$ (OC > P^*) should not have produced or sold the units.
Equilibrium is a situation in which no more trade can occur.
To prove that equilibrium is a unique and stable solution, one must demonstrate that no other outcome is possible.

Proof by Contradiction: The Stability of $P^*$

To prove that $P^*$ is the only stable price, we define a universe of feasible points (a price-quantity system) and eliminate all points except $(P^*, Q^*)$ . Competition is the mechanism that drives the price back to $P^*$ if it deviates.

Case 1: Price Above Equilibrium (P > P^*)

Let $\bar{P}$ be a price identified above $P^*$ .
At $\bar{P}$ , the quantity demanded ( $Q_D$ ) is lower than the quantity supplied ( $Q_S$ ), resulting in excess supply.
There are fewer willing buyers and many more willing sellers (disappointed sellers).
Traded Quantity: In a market where buyers and sellers are matched, the lower of the two values determines the number of trades. At $\bar{P}$ , the traded quantity is limited to $Q_D$ .
The Competitive Process:
- Sellers who could not sell (disappointed sellers) are rational economic agents.
- Because the opportunity cost of producing for these sellers is below $\bar{P}$ , they are willing to lower their asking price to sell their product.
- As long as the price is above the seller's opportunity cost, they can profitably lower the price to find a buyer.
- Buyers will shift to the lower-priced sellers (e.g., finding apples for $30\text{ cents}$ instead of $50\text{ cents}$ ).
- This downward price bidding continues until there are no more sellers with opportunity costs lower than the market price, which occurs at $P^*$ .

Case 2: Price Below Equilibrium (P < P^*)

Let $\underline{P}$ be a price below $P^*$ .
At $\underline{P}$ , quantity demanded ( $Q_D$ ) exceeds quantity supplied ( $Q_S$ ), resulting in excess demand.
Disappointed Buyers: There are people willing to buy at $\underline{P}$ but cannot find enough sellers.
The Competitive Process:
- Buyers have valuations above $\underline{P}$ . To secure the limited supply, they will bid the price up.
- Since the supply curve is upward-sloping, raising the price attracts more sellers into the market.
- Competition amongst buyers drives the price higher until all individuals with valuations above the market price have obtained the good.
- The process stops at $P^*$ because individuals remaining in the market value the good at less than $P^*$ and will not bid higher.

Dual Interpretation of Supply and Demand Curves

Horizontal Interpretation (Standard):
- At a given price, how much quantity are buyers/sellers willing to trade?
- Demand: $P \rightarrow Q_D$ .
- Supply: $P \rightarrow Q_S$ .
Vertical Interpretation (Flipped Axis):
- Demand Curve: Represents the valuation of the product for the marginal consumer at each quantity.
- Supply Curve: Represents the opportunity cost of producing each additional unit.
- Every economic agent operates based on these intrinsic values ( $V$ and $OC$ ).

Comparative Statics: Analyzing Market Shocks

Comparative Statics is the exercise of comparing two static equilibrium situations: an old equilibrium and a new equilibrium.
A new outcome ( $P$ , $Q$ ) can only be explained by a shift in the demand or supply curves, not a movement along them.
Exogenous Factors: Shifts are caused by factors outside of the price-quantity system, such as changes in consumer income.

The Demand Shock Process

Consider an increase in demand (e.g., for a normal good when income rises).
At every given price, the quantity demanded increases.
At the original $P^*$ , there is now an immediate excess demand.
Competition among buyers drives the price up to a new equilibrium ( $P^{**}$ , $Q^{**}$ , or "p double star").

The Supply Shock Process

Consider an increase in supply (a shift to the right).
At every given price, quantity supplied increases.
At the old $P^*$ , there is now an excess supply.
Competition among disappointed sellers drives the price down until a new intersection is reached at a lower equilibrium price.

Questions & Discussion

Question 1: Simultaneous Increase in Demand and Supply

Scenario: Both demand and supply shift to the right.
Analysis:
- Because the market becomes "thicker" (more buyers and more sellers), the quantity traded ( $Q^*$ ) must increase.
- The effect on price ( $P^*$ ) is ambiguous. If demand increases more than supply, price rises; if supply increases more, price falls; if they shift equally, price remains unchanged.
Outcome: The correct answer in the lecture poll was "D" (all of the above are possible/ambiguous) because while quantity definitely increases, price depends on the relative extent of the shifts.

Question 2: Increase in Demand and Decrease in Supply

Scenario: More people want to buy (e.g., a new iPhone) but production is cut.
Analysis:
- The competitive forces on both sides drive prices up. Therefore, price ( $P^*$ ) will definitely increase.
- The effect on the equilibrium quantity ( $Q^*$ ) is ambiguous and depends on which shift is of a greater magnitude.
Outcome: The correct answer was "D" again (ambiguous quantity).

Summary of Intuition

Market Expansion: When both curves shift right, quantity increases.
Market Contraction: When both curves shift left, quantity decreases.
Surplus/Shortage: The orientation of shifts determines whether there is a downward pressure on price (surplus/excess supply) or upward pressure (shortage/excess demand).
Note: Economics is a formalization of common sense. Successful students combine mathematical/graphing proficiency with human intuition about market thickness and competition.