Gait Dysfunction in Neurologic Conditions

Objectives
  • Discuss Motor Control of gait.

  • Discuss the impact of neurologic dysfunction on gait.

  • Introduce Outcome Measures for the assessment of various elements of gait.

  • Apply subtasks of gait and the hypothesis-driven clinical decision-making process to the assessment of gait.

Phases of Gait
  • Bipedal Gait: Characterized by limbs moving in a rhythmical, symmetrical, alternating pattern.

  • Motor Modules (Muscle Synergies): Coordinated patterns of muscle activity essential for functional tasks like gait.

Fun Facts of Typical Gait
  • During comfortable walking speed, gait involves 60%60\% in stance and 40%40\% in swing. This proportion evens out as walking speed increases.

  • An individual's most comfortable walking speed is also their most energy-efficient speed.

  • The average gait speed for healthy adults is approximately 1.46 m/s1.46\text{ m/s} (with a cadence of 1.9 steps per second1.9\text{ steps per second} and a step length of 76.3 cm76.3\text{ cm}).

  • The average steps per minute are 110115110-115.

  • Walking speed is considered the "6th Vital Sign" due to its strong correlation with functional ability, fall risk, and mortality in adults.

Walking Subtasks and Muscle Synergies
  • Motor modules combine the co-activation of multiple muscles to achieve specific gait subtasks:

    • Bodyweight Support

      • Muscles involved: Glutes, Quads, PF (Plantar Flexors), PLTA (Posterior/Lateral Tibialis Anterior), Ham (Hamstrings).

    • Propulsion

      • Muscles involved: Quad, PF, PLTA, Ham, Glute.

    • Limb Advancement

      • Muscles involved: Glutes, Quad, PF, PL, Ham, Glute.

  • These subtasks also involve:

    • Spatial Coordination: Relates to the synergy composition.

    • Temporal Coordination: Relates to the synergy timing.

Task Requirements of Gait
  • Progression: Involves rhythmical patterns of muscle activation that successfully initiate, continue, and terminate body movement.

  • Stability: Requires coordination of motor and sensory systems for body orientation and stability to maintain the Center of Mass (COM) over a moving Base of Support (BOS).

  • Adaptation: Refers to the flexibility of the system to adjust gait to changing task and environmental demands.

Functional Components of Gait Subtasks (Adapted from Moore KL, 2017)
  • Body Weight Support

    • Stability: Securing the limb for weight acceptance, providing vertical stabilizing forces against gravity, and shock absorption.

  • Propulsion

    • Progression: Generating horizontal force to propel the body forward.

  • Limb Advancement

    • Progression: Advancing the swing leg.

    • Stability: Repositioning the limb in preparation for weight acceptance.

    • Adaptability: Avoiding obstacles.

Motor Control of Walking
  • Motor Abundance: The motor system possesses more degrees of freedom than necessary to achieve a specific outcome. This enables the nervous system to generate multiple equally effective movement solutions.

  • Motor Variability: Refers to variations in movement patterns and muscle activation even when performing the same action. This allows the motor system to be adaptable to new or unexpected challenges.

  • Distinction: Motor abundance represents the available resources for movement, while motor variability signifies the different ways these resources are actually used during movement.

Sensory and Cognitive Systems' Impacts on Gait
  • Visual Processing:

    • Essential for visual object recognition to move effectively in space (identifying surface/object and its relation to the person).

    • Important for body alignment with reference to gravity and the environment.

    • Visual flow input helps modulate speed and stepping frequency.

  • Somatosensation:

    • Influences stepping frequency.

    • Triggers the onset of swing (afferent input from hip flexors when stretched).

    • Provides inputs crucial for postural control and gait adaptation, especially on varied surfaces.

    • Contributes to interlimb coordination (rhythmical arm and leg movements).

  • Cognition:

    • Critical for gait initiation and gait adaptation in complex environments.

Impact of Neurologic Dysfunction on Gait
  • Walking dysfunction affects over 80%80\% of stroke survivors.

  • Although most individuals regain some level of ambulation, hemiparetic gait post-stroke is typically slow, metabolically demanding, and unstable.

  • The level of ambulation following a stroke is a long-term predictor of participation and disability.

Impact of Stroke on Motor Control
  • Individuals post-stroke often exhibit reduced isolated control and atypical synergies/coupling of muscle groups.

  • This results in a merging of motor modules with limited variability in movement, leading to decreased speed, stability, and efficiency in gait (as per J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 18, 58 (2021)).

Hemiparetic Gait Post-Stroke
  • Characterized by a combination of dysfunctions:

    • Motor System Dysfunction

    • Sensory System Dysfunction

    • Visual System Dysfunction

Motor System Dysfunction
  • Impaired Cortical Drive:

    • Leads to impaired or disordered force production.

    • Causes abnormal coupling of muscles.

    • Results in mass patterns of movement (abnormal synergy) and decreased selective/isolated control.

    • Common coactivation/abnormal synergistic patterns occur, contributing to decreased variability of movement.

    • Associated with reduced gait speed, efficiency, and stability.

Motor Disorders: Paresis/Force Production/Weakness
  • Impacts on Bodyweight Support/Stance Phase:

    • Equinovarus foot position at initial contact:

      • Limits dorsiflexion (DF) in midstance, preventing tibial progression.

      • Can contribute to knee hyperextension in mid and terminal stance.

      • Impairs propulsion and gait speed.

      • Provides an unstable surface in stance (Campanini I. Front Neuro 2020; Esquenazi A. Toxicon. 2023).

    • Quadriceps weakness:

      • Results in decreased knee control during loading and midstance, leading to knee hyperextension or buckling.

    • Glut/Hip Extensor weakness:

      • Causes decreased gait speed and a forward trunk lean in stance.

    • Glut/Hip Abductor weakness:

      • Leads to a Trendelenberg gait with a lateral trunk lean; decreases the Base of Support (BOS).

  • Impacts on Propulsion/Plantarflexors:

    • Reduced central drive to plantarflexors (PF) contributes to impaired propulsion, resulting in slower walking speeds and increased energy cost of walking

    • Trail limb angle (stretch to hip flexors) plays a significant role.

    • Decreased paretic propulsion results in slower gait speed and less walking distance, potentially limiting community mobility

  • Impacts on Limb Advancement/Swing Phase:

    • Hip flexion (@ initiation of swing):

      • Decreased knee flexion in pre-swing (propulsion) with reduced toe clearance.

      • Results in shortened step length and altered foot position at heel strike (impacting postural control).

      • Compensatory strategies include posterior pelvic tilt and activation of abdominals, circumduction with hip hike, and vaulting over the contralateral limb.

      • These compensatory movements are also related to impaired propulsion and trail limb angle.

    • Tibialis Anterior weakness:

      • Decreased activation of TA during limb advancement contributes to tripping and falling (impacting adaptability).

      • Can affect progression (gait speed) and contribute to decreased efficiency.

Motor Disorders: Impaired Coordination
  • Impaired Segmental Coordination:

    • Inability to control the timing and scaling of movement, leading to an Ataxic gait pattern.

    • Characterized by varied BOS, irregular stepping, and a staggered gait.

    • Often involves impaired coupling of arm and leg movements.

    • More common in pathologies of the cerebellum and basal ganglia.

  • Abnormal Phasing of Multi-joint Movements:

    • Includes co-activation of agonists and antagonists.

    • The impact on mobility is more significant with increased speed of movement; movements may be more controlled at slower speeds or during single-joint actions.

Sensory Dysfunction
  • Absent or Impaired Sensory Input: Affects information regarding body position in space and surface navigation.

  • Consequences:

    • Slower gait speed.

    • Impaired postural control and adaptability, which worsens on irregular terrain.

    • Ataxic gait pattern.

    • Decreased or irregular stance time and step length.

    • Gait may improve with increased visual inputs and decline when visual cues are limited.

Visual Dysfunction
  • Impaired or Inaccurate Visual Cues:

    • Impacts the gait movement itself and the ability to navigate/interpret the environment.

    • Leads to impaired adaptability.

    • Results in impaired obstacle avoidance.

    • Hinders the ability to modulate speed and stepping.

Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Can encompass issues with memory, attention, or executive function.

  • Consequences:

    • Impaired gait initiation, adaptation, and navigation.

    • Slower gait speed.

    • Impaired dual-task ability (the capacity to walk while attention is divided to another task).

Gait Assessment
  • Observation Gait Analysis

  • Functional Independence Measure (FIM) - Note: Retired in 2019.

  • 10 Meter Walk Test

  • 6 Minute Walk Test

  • Functional Gait Assessment

Observation Gait Assessment
  • Procedure:

    • Includes observations with and without an assistive device or orthosis.

    • Needs to be observed in both the frontal and sagittal planes.

    • Focus on:

      • Identifying the environment, surface, and level of assistance needed.

      • Observing posture and symmetry of the gait pattern.

      • Describing Lower Extremity (LE) kinematics from a proximal to distal pattern in each phase of gait.

      • Hypothesizing underlying impairments in body structure and function contributing to gait dysfunction.

  • Reliability: Video recording can significantly improve the reliability of observational analysis of gait.

Observation Gait Analysis – Normative Data (Kinematics and Muscle Activity)
  • Initial Contact:

    • Ankle: Neutral 00^\circ.

    • Knee: Appears extended.

    • Hip: 2020^\circ flexion; Hip extensors and abductors active.

  • Loading Response:

    • Ankle: 55^\circ Plantarflexion (PF); Eccentric Pretibials.

    • Knee: 2020^\circ flexion; Eccentric Quads.

    • Hip: 2020^\circ flexion; Hip extensors and abductors active.

  • Mid Stance:

    • Ankle: 1010^\circ Dorsiflexion (DF); Concentric Gastrocnemius (GS).

    • Knee: Appears extended; Concentric Quads.

    • Hip: Neutral; some hamstring and abductor activity.

  • Terminal Stance:

    • Ankle: 1515^\circ DF; Concentric GS.

    • Knee: Appears extended; Eccentric Quads.

    • Hip: 2020^\circ extension; assistance from rectus femoris.

  • Pre Swing:

    • Ankle: 55^\circ PF; Concentric GS.

    • Knee: Concentric Hamstrings to achieve 4040^\circ flexion; Inactive Quadriceps.

    • Hip: 1010^\circ extension; minimal iliacus and quads activity.

  • Initial Swing:

    • Ankle: Neutral 00^\circ; Concentric Pretibials.

    • Knee: 6060^\circ flexion; Concentric Gracilis.

    • Hip: 1515^\circ flexion; some iliacus and quads activity.

  • Mid Swing:

    • Ankle: Neutral 00^\circ; Concentric Pretibials.

    • Knee: 2525^\circ flexion; Eccentric Hamstring.

    • Hip: 2525^\circ flexion; Hamstring activity.

  • Terminal Swing:

    • Ankle: Neutral 00^\circ; Concentric Pretibials.

    • Knee: Appears extended; Eccentric Hamstring; Concentric Quads.

    • Hip: 2020^\circ flexion; Hamstring activity.

Common Gait Deviations in Hemiparetic Gait and Possible Impairments
  • Initial Contact/Loading:

    • Gait Deviations: Decreased heel strike, foot slap, equinovarus foot position.

    • Possible Impairments: Weakness of pretibials, decreased DF PROM (Passive Range of Motion), impaired somatosensation.

  • Midstance/Terminal Stance:

    • Gait Deviations: Positive Trendelenberg sign, decreased tibial progression, knee hyperextension or flexion, shortened step length, decreased trail limb position.

    • Possible Impairments: Weakness of plantarflexors, hip extensors/abductors, quadriceps; decreased DF, hip extension PROM; impaired somatosensation.

  • Preswing:

    • Gait Deviations: Decreased push-off.

    • Possible Impairments: Weakness of plantarflexors; impaired somatosensation.

  • Swing Phase:

    • Gait Deviations: Hip hike, circumduction, vaulting, decreased knee flexion, decreased peak DF.

    • Possible Impairments: Weakness of pretibials > hip flexors > quadriceps; decreased DF ROM; impaired sensation.

Alternative Methods of Gait Analysis
  • Kinematic Quantitative Gait Analysis: Measures spatial and temporal variables of gait.

    • Variables: Speed, cadence, stride/step length and time, double limb support, stance and swing time, acceleration, BOS width.

    • Methods: Capture patient footprints, use of a gait grid, accelerometers, commercial instrumented systems, footswitches, video-based motion analysis, EMG.

  • Kinetic Gait Analysis: Analyzes forces involved in gait.

    • Variables: Ground reaction forces, pressure forces, center of pressure and torque.

    • Methods: Force plates, dynamometers.

Functional Independence Measure (FIM): Retired
  • Description: An 1818-item observational measure assessing a patient's disability level and the amount of assistance required for ADLs.

  • Items: Includes self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition.

  • Usage: Used exclusively in Rehabilitation settings.

10 Meter Walk Test
  • Purpose: Standardized assessment of both comfortable and fast walking speed in meters/second over a short distance.

  • Administration:

    • Patient can use bracing or assistive devices.

    • Assist for safety can be provided, but if it affects forward propulsion speed, a score of "00" meters is documented.

    • If assist or devices are used, the assessment should not be compared to a later assessment completed with different levels of assist or devices.

  • Normative Data/Interpretation:

    • <0.4\text{ m/s}: Household ambulators.

    • 0.40.8 m/s0.4-0.8\text{ m/s}: Limited community ambulators.

    • >0.8\text{ m/s}: Community ambulators.

  • Measurement of Detectable Change (MDC):

    • Acute: 0.11 m/s0.11\text{ m/s}.

    • Chronic (>6\text{ months} comfortable speed): 0.18 m/s0.18\text{ m/s}.

  • Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID):

    • Subacute (<45\text{ days}): 0.16 m/s0.16\text{ m/s}.

Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
  • Purpose: Assesses postural stability during walking and an individual’s ability to perform multiple motor tasks while walking.

  • Background: A revised version of the Dynamic Gait Index.

  • Administration:

    • Standardized administration and scoring of 1010 items.

    • Individuals need to be able to walk without assistance from another person, but can use a device or bracing.

  • Cut-off for Older Adults: <22/30 indicates a risk for falls.

  • MDC: 4.2 pts4.2\text{ pts} or 14.1%14.1\% change (applicable for acute, subacute, and chronic stroke).

6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
  • Purpose: A sub-maximal exercise test used to assess walking endurance and aerobic capacity.

  • Administration:

    • Standardized administration including instructions and course setup.

    • Patient can use bracing or assistive devices.

    • Patient can stand and rest, but if they sit, the assessment ends.

    • Assist for safety can be provided, but if it affects forward propulsion speed, a score of "00" meters is documented.

    • If assist or devices are used, the assessment should not be compared to a later assessment completed with different levels of assist or devices.

  • Predictive Value: Can be more predictive of potential for community mobility than the 10 MWT.

  • Normative Data for Community Dwelling Elders:

    • Distance walked >205\text{ m} discriminated between home and limited community ambulators.

    • Distance walked >288\text{ m} discriminated between limited and unlimited community ambulators.

  • MDC:

    • Subacute (30150 days30-150\text{ days} post-stroke): 61.0 m61.0\text{ m}.

  • MCID:

    • Chronic (>6\text{ months}): 34.4 m34.4\text{ m}.

Combined Set up For All! (Environmental Setup for Core Measures)
  • Total Path Length: 12 meters12\text{ meters} for the 6MWT.

  • Cones for 6MWT Turnaround: Placed at 49 inches49\text{ inches} from the ends of the 12-meter12\text{-meter} path.

  • 10mWT Start/Stop: 6 meters6\text{ meters} segment within the path.

  • FGA Items: Performed in a 20-foot20\text{-foot} segment with a 12-inch12\text{-inch} width (cones at 2 meters2\text{ meters} from each end).