McKeown2004_Global Migration 1846 1940

Global Migration, 1846-1940

Introduction

  • Author: Adam McKeown

  • Published in: Journal of World History, Volume 15, Number 2, June 2004

  • Historical importance of mass long-distance migrations in world history.

Historical Context

  • Mass migration particularly significant from 1846 until 1940.

  • Global extent of migrations across continents not widely acknowledged by historians.

  • Focus often remains primarily on transatlantic migrations related to American industrialization.

Migration Patterns and Analysis

Overview of Migration

  • Major migrations occurred in North and Southeast Asia, largely overlooked alongside transatlantic migrations.

  • Asia and Africa migrations conceptualized as supporting European colonial labor needs, overshadowing free migration perspectives.

  • Migrations were not simply random but part of systemic demographic and economic transformations.

Key Migration Flows (1846-1940)

  • Three main circuits of migration:

    • To the Americas: 55-58 million from Europe, and approximately 2.5 million from Asia and Africa.

    • To Southeast Asia: 48-52 million, mainly from India and China.

    • To North Asia (including Manchuria): 46-51 million, mostly from other parts of Asia and Russia.

  • Significant numbers arise from each origin, though not all migrations are well documented.

Statistical Overview

  • Over 65% of transatlantic migrants headed to the United States.

  • Pre-1870s emigration primarily from the British Isles.

  • Migration dynamics shifted with technology advancements in transportation during the 1880s.

Economic and Political Influences on Migration

Impact of Industrialization

  • Migration driven by industrial demands and economic opportunities in receiving regions.

  • Rise in transportation technologies facilitated migration flow.

Political Responses and Regulation

  • Migration patterns affected by political borders, immigration restrictions post-WWI,

  • 1920s regulations emerged in response to rising nationalism and the influx of immigrants.

Comparative Analysis of Migrations

Unique Characteristics of Migrations

  • Asian migrations often misunderstood; positioned as coerced compared to perceived free European migration.

  • The segmentation of global migration systems limits overall analysis; migrations are affected by modern economic and political processes.

Key Examples of Migration

  • Chinese Migration:

    • Mainly from Guangdong and Fujian provinces; low rate of indentured contracts relative to overall migrations.

    • Massive movement into Southeast Asia primarily undertaken with colonial support or under debt obligations.

  • Indian Migration:

    • Approximately 29 million Indians migrated to British colonies; majority did not go under indentured contracts but were assisted by colonial authorities.

  • Movement into North Asia began to rise after 1860; included significant numbers from Korea and Japan due to economic drives.

Population Growth and Migration Evolution

Impact on Global Population Distribution

  • Population in receiving regions (Americas, North Asia, Southeast Asia) surged, significantly outpacing emigration rates in sending regions (Europe, South Asia, and China).

  • From 1850 to 1950, receiving regions accounted for an increasing share of the global population.

Historical Periodization

  • Historians often consider 1914-1920 as the end of mass migrations—a perspective challenged by ongoing migration trends into the 1920s.

Conclusion

Challenges in Historical Narrative

  • Migration discussions often limit focus to transatlantic flow, failing to encapsulate broader global movements, including those from Asia and Africa.

  • Future research needs to reframe migration narratives, recognizing the integral role of Asian migrations and others in shaping global dynamics.

Suggestions for Future Research

  • Understanding migration necessitates examining it as a social practice embedded within political frameworks and existing networks.

  • Emphasis should shift towards transnational networks, acknowledging the shared history and interconnectedness of migrations across regions.