Effects of Extreme Ritual Practices on Psychophysiological Well-Being

Effects of Extreme Ritual Practices on Psychophysiological Well-Being

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Xygalatas
    Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA (xygalatas@uconn.edu)

  • Sammyh Khan
    School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK

  • Martin Lang
    Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

  • Radek Kundt
    Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion (LEVYNA), Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  • Eva Kundtová-Klocová
    Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion (LEVYNA), Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  • Jan Krátký
    Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion (LEVYNA), Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  • John Shaver
    Religious Studies Program, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Publication Information

  • Submitted: 27 IV 18

  • Accepted: 5 XII 18

  • Published: 30 VIII 19

  • DOI: 10.1086/705665

  • Citations: 31

  • Reads: 1,666

Abstract

  • Extreme ritual practices involving pain and suffering pose risks such as injury, trauma, or infection but are performed by millions as culturally prescribed remedies, particularly for mental health issues.

  • Study examined one of the world's extreme rituals involving bodily mutilation and prolonged suffering.

  • Findings suggest participation had no detrimental effects on physiological health and was associated with subjective health improvements, particularly for those engaging in more intense participation.

  • Individuals facing health issues or low socioeconomic status tended to seek more painful forms of engagement.

  • Proposed mechanisms include bottom-up neurological responses to pain and top-down processes related to social support and self-enhancement, influencing quality of life.

  • Emphasizes the importance of traditional practices for coping with adversity where psychiatric or medical interventions are scarce.

Background and Significance

  • Religious beliefs and practices significantly impact personal and public health, such as dietary restrictions and health-related behaviors.

  • Previous studies suggest that engaging in religious activities, such as prayer, yoga, and collective rituals, positively affects psychological and physiological well-being (Bernardi et al. 2001; Gupta et al. 1997).

  • Limited understanding exists regarding extreme religious rituals which involve stress, pain, and bodily mutilation, despite their historical and cultural prevalence (Xygalatas 2012).

  • Such rituals, while posing risks, are undertaken voluntarily and often considered remedies for various ailments, especially in mental health contexts (Jilek 1982).

  • Investigating these phenomena is pivotal in developing societies where biomedical and folk health interventions coexist, posing the question of compatibility between them.

Ethnographic Setting of the Study

  • Focus on Kavadi Attam (burden dance), a ritual performed by Tamil Hindus involving body piercings and pilgrimage to Lord Murugan's temple during festivals such as Thaipusam.

  • Ritual preparation includes fasting and prayer, followed by piercings and carrying heavy altars (more than 3 m tall, weighing up to 60 kg).

  • Participants may also walk on shoes with nails or drag chariots attached to their skin.

  • The festival represents major spiritual significance in the Tamil community, often viewed as a vow of reciprocity to the deity.

  • Strong communal bonds are formed through collective participation, affecting perceived well-being and providing social recognition.

Methodology

Participants
  • Enrolled 39 males (mean age 45.21, SD 15.76) for the ritual group (19 underwent piercing and carried a kavadi), and 20 controls from the same community. Two dropped out, resulting in 37 total subjects.

  • Participants monitored to assess stress levels, sleep efficiency (SE), and physical activity during three phases spanning 2 months: pre-ritual, during the festival, and post-ritual.

Physiological Measures
  • Used BodyMedia SenseWear mini armband to record:

    • Heart Rate (HR)

    • Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) as a stress biomarker

    • Sleep Efficiency (SE), reflecting immune system activity

  • Data consistently recorded for over 22 hours daily with an average adherence rate of 92.2%.

  • Controls accounted for physical activity and potential confounding factors like age, BMI, and humidity through a heat index.

Psychological Measures
  • Administered clinically validated tools:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression

    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) for anxiety

    • EUROHIS-QOL for quality of life assessment

    • Single-Item Health Status (SIHS) for self-assessed health

Observational Data
  • Collected via median split on number of piercings suffered (mean = 63.23, SD = 11.61) distinguishing high versus low pain experiences.

  • Socioeconomic status (SES) assessed through education, occupational prestige, and material wealth.

Data Analysis

  • Analyzed using R software, incorporating predictors for demographic variables and employing logistic models for pain/stress predictions.

  • Assessments between conditions (ritual versus control) documented changes from pre to post-ritual levels of health.

Results

  • Significant decrease in mean HR and GSR from pre to post-ritual, but no significant differences between groups overall.

  • No substantial differences in depression, anxiety, or quality of life however; a noteworthy interaction noted where the ritual group showed improvement compared to controls.

  • Increased self-assessed health scores in the ritual group post-ritual exceeded those of control participants.

Socioeconomic and Health Findings
  • Participants of lower SES and those suffering from chronic illness reported higher engagement levels in painful practices, implying adaptive coping strategies via extreme rituals.

Discussion

  • Although extreme rituals have risks, they paradoxically offer psychological benefits.

  • Connectedness and cultural beliefs potentially amplify the perceived impacts of extreme rituals on health.

  • Bottom-up neurological and top-down social mechanisms facilitate these positive outcomes, reinforcing participant well-being.

Limitations
  • Challenges in isolating factors due to naturalistic setting constraints necessitated observational methodology.

  • Sample limitations included recruitment challenges yielding minimal variance in samples prone to anxiety and depression.

Conclusion

  • Supports the role of traditional cultural practices in improving psychological well-being amidst environmental stressors.

  • Highlights the necessity to recognize cultural approaches alongside biomedical interventions for health management, especially in underserved communities.