PCL WEEK 3&4
ETHICS AND CLINICAL RESEARCH
Definition of ethics:
Rights and responsibilities
Values pertaining to human conduct
Right and wrong
Eg of ethical value: justice
Nonmaleficence means to do no harm (does the benefit outweigh the burden)
Beneficence is action for benefit of others to help prevent harms
Non exploitation
Respect
Autonomy: the patient has own rights to your own body even if it differs from physicians
Goals of clinical research
Generalise knowledge to improve health and understand human bio
Ethical requirements for clinical research
There can be a potential forexploitant in human subjects cause using them for the good of others
But you want to minimise the possibility of exploitation (but it is always kind of there)
Sources of guidance on ethical conduct
Internation documents
Declaration of Helsinki
A lot of them were written in response to ethical events to prevent it
Eg Historical events of ethical misconduct
Nuremberg code condemns atrocities of nazi physicians
Tuskegee study
Declaration of Helsinki
THE NUREMBERG CODE
Voluntary consent is essentials
Guidelines for whether it's ethical or not:
Has 7 criteria
Universal
You can't lie to your volunteer
Value
Research has to be valuable with a goal of improving human health
What isn't valuable: results that aren't generalizable, cant be an overlap of something that has been done before, unlikely to be disseminated, has to be practically implemented like not fancy
Value is important cause resources are limited, avoiding exploitation
Is the intervention feasible?
Finite resources may be economic or scientific
Scientific Validity
Rigorous methods, value can be great but designed or conducted poorly then thats bad cause have experienced people who arent thorough and cautious, results are invalid
No purpose?
Methods have to be appropriate and feasible, clear scientific objective
Lacking scientific study eg. too few subjects, sloppy conducting
If the outcome is already known then no point but also without scientific validity researcher wont know benefits which is a risk for subjects
Fair subject selection
Which communities or types of people are approached
Efficiency cannot be more important than fairness
Recruiting strategy are seen by ethics boards
Keep out people being high risk of being harmed
Some people may have the disease but can also enjoy the potential benefits
Favourable risk-benefit ratio:
3 conditions:
Potential risk is minimised
The potential benefit is enhanced
Potential benefit to risk is proportionate
Identify risks and minimise them with research
Specify potential benefits
Could changes be made to increase the benefit
Avoid extraneous benefits like financial or extra medical services that are unrelated
Clinical research is NOT to provide health service
Make sure you communicate the hazards with other phases of clinical research
Is the societal benefit being outweighed by the risk
Independent review
Medical research interest isnt affecting the design
Interest: advance their careers, quick research get funding
Study is reviewed by people who are unaffiliated to the study
Eg IRB or REB
Before a cynical trial begins they must be apporved by REB
Theyll check how youre recruiting, consent, risk benefit proportionality, confidentiality, fairness
Informed consent
participants making their own decisions for themselves
Ethical Principle of Autonomy
As a subject confirm with doctors whether it's okay for you to do it
Consent is voluntary, informed, and ongoing
Structure of consent form: contact info, defined purpose, risks and benefits, confidentiality, voluntary consent, summary and signature that is witnessed
Respect
Treated with respect even if subject doesnt want ot be a part any longer
If there's any new info let them know
Look at adverse reactions
Let the subject know how they contributed
Lecture 7 (week 4)
Clinical Trials
General Clinical Trials Overview
How to participate
Phase 1 clinical trials overview
Pharmacokinetics
Phase 1-3: premarket clinical trials in the drug discovery pipeline
Who conducts trials?
A company that develops the drug or they sponsor it and controls it (30%)
Actual trials in universities and private clinical research organization (70%)
Eg. princess margaret has a bunch of phase 1 clinical trials for cancer
Trial has many locations
Supervisors: medical doctor, expert
Where are phase 1 clinical trials held?
In proper institutions
Takes a long time- to monitor for safety
People get bored cause it takes times like days or weeks
How to participate
Websites
Contact family doctor and they can refer you to them
Call them directly like ad
They'll call you to see if you meet the requirements or are eligible through phone
Inclusion criteria
Goal of making sure that people in the trial are similar biologically eg healthy
Eg. no other medications, bmi, healthy and young
Exclusion criteria
Protect people who might be harmed by the study drug
Excluded, pregnnt women, people with adverse reaction, people with family history of disease
Then make appointment for screening visit, conse form and more info
Screening visit
Must meet strict entry requirement (inclusion and exclusion)
In person screening is more detailed
Physical exams and testing
Will the trial actually help yo? What are the known and potential risks and benefits?
How to start phase 1 participation?
Contact CRO or hospital
Who is in phase 1 trial?
Healthy volunteers
Exception: cancer or oncolgy drugs
Risk of drugs like that on healthy volunteers is too high so use cancer patients
Design of phase 1 clinical trials:
With the help of animal studies know the dose but usually use smaller amount then suggested by animal study
Start with much smaller doses in humans
single ascending order, low to high
Calculate a starting dose based on animal and then convert to human dose
Slow and safe
Is a single dose of the drug safe?
Single ascending dose desing
Called a cohort
Choose dosage and how many pills
How many people on dosage and placebo (they wouldnt know)
How many people Sentinel group and main group?
Are repeated doses safe?
Choose dosage and then change how many pills you give (like 5 over 5 days)
Why choose placebo? Some things may not be drug related, safety issues actually related to drug?
Phase 1 research question
What doses are tolerable
Is it safe
How does the drug move in the body?
This result guides us to phase 2
How to tell if drug is safe?
Biomarkers? Test in blood and urine
Things you can measure with number
Eg. bp, tmp, cholesterol level, medical image, blood sugar, etc
Cliincal signs like written document and observation
Adverse events
Undesirable experiences
serious Adverse events
Death
Life-threatening
Becoming hospiliazsed
Disability or permanent damage
Is the safety in drug treated group the same as placebo group
Is the safety in 1 dose the same as multiple dose
EG. clinical trial disaster phase 1
Drug to treat anxiety
Single ascending dose study for 64 volunteers
0.25 mg to 100 mg
Then sarted multiple ascending dose trials with each having 8 subjects eg. first group received 2.5 mg daily, the second 5 mg an the accident happened in the 5gh group which recieved 50 mg daily- highest dose
Serious AE: person brain dead, 5 in hospitals
BUT WHY?
Gradual accumulation in brain which caused adverse reaction in later stage and not single dosage
Taught lesson and how to reduce accidents
However the person who died had head concussion therefore selection process for volunteers should be VERY STRICT, check biomarkers before
Phase 1 trials are generally safe and disaster is usual
Pharmacokinetics in phase 1
How it moves in body
Frequent blood and urine tests to measure drug concentraion in bodily fluids
Drug content in body and not getting digested by stomach
How quickly did body absorb it and how quickly body is eliminating (kidney or liver breaking ti down)
Results of phase 1 studies
Early measure of safety and tolerability
How does drug move in the body and how does dosage influence that