Longitudinal Case #4: EXTRA NOTES
šø FULL MEDICATION HISTORY (Script-Ready Version)
(Cleaned, organized, grouped, and interpreted ā no recommendations yet, just accurate history)
Random Facts:
Has not tried Abx UTI prophylaxis (reminder allergic to SMX/TMP)
Has tried methenamine prophylaxis but was ineffective at reducint UTIs
Recently treated with etrapenem (due to ciprofloxacin allergy) for UTI episodeĀ
No urine/C&S for most recent infection available
UTI unrelated to coitusĀ
Unclear if UTIs were cystitis or pyelonephritis (doesnt remember sx)
Hx of pseudomonas UTIsĀ
š 1. Analgesics & Opioids
Tylenol #3 (Acetaminophen/Codeine/Caffeine)
Dose: 2 tablets q4h PRN
Dispense: 40 tablets every 2 weeks
Indication:Ā Pain + HeadachesĀ
Notes from patient: Uses regularly; essentially functioning as scheduled therapy.
Last fill: April 10 2025Ā
Morphine IR 5 mg
Dose: 1 tab q6h PRN
Dispense: 30 tablet
(Usually takes 1 tab/day)
Indication: Breakthrough pain (bladder pain); catheter changesĀ Ā
Usually takes when doing catheter changes monthly + 2-3 days following procedureĀ
Last Fill:Ā Feb 11 2025
Morphine SR 15 mg
Dose: 1 cap TID PRN
Usually 1 cap/day (daily)
Dispense: 60 caps
Indication: Chronic bladder pain (self-directed)
Last Fill: Feb 11, 2025
Ketorolac 10 mg
Dose: 1 tab BID PRN
Indication: Severe pain flares
Notes: Dispensed Feb 11 2025 (Emergency Department)Ā
Naproxen 500 mg
Dose: 1 tab BID with food, PRN inflammation
Indication: Pain, inflammation
Last fill: March 23 2025
Cyclobenzaprine 10 mg
Dose: 1 tab HS PRN
Indication:Ā Bladder spasms
Notes: Patient reports poor bladder spasm relief.
Dispensed: April 10, 2025
š„ 2. Neuropathic / Central Pain Agents
Gabapentin 300 mg & 400 mg
Dose: 1200 mg TID (300 mg x4 TID)
History: Sometimes filled as 400 mg capsules
Indication:Ā Nerve pain/sciaticaĀ
Notes: Regular use; weekly blister.
Last fill: April 9 2025
Duloxetine 60 mg
Dose: 90 mg every morning
Indication:Ā anxiety/depression (mood)
Form: Weekly blister pack
Last fill: April 9 2025
𤢠3. Nausea & GI Agents
Nabilone 1 mg
Dose: 2 mg TID
Indication: Nausea + pain
Notes: Patient reports effectiveness.
Last fill: April 9, 2025
Ondansetron ODT 4 mg
Dose: ½ā1 tab PRN
Indication: Nausea (Effective for her)
Use: 1ā2 times/week
Last fill: Feb 12, 2025
Metoclopramide 5 mg
Dose: 1 tab TID
Indication:Ā Headache associated Nausea
Notes: Still taking; confirm reason.
Last Fill: April 9 2025 (Daily dispense blister)Ā
Rabeprazole 20 mg
Dose: 20 mg BID
Indication:Ā Acid refluxĀ
Notes: Chronic PPI therapy ā linked to low ferritin.
Patient confirms symptoms. well controlledare
Last fill: April 9, 2025
Fosfomycin 3 g
Use: 1 dose before monthly catheter changes
Indication: Prophylaxis against UTI bacteria during catheter swap
Last fill: Nov 6, 2024
š§ 4. Psychiatric Medications
Lorazepam 1 mg SL
Dose: 1 tab SL daily PRN
Quantity: 10 tabs/week
Indication: Anxiety
Last fill: March 7 2025
Hydroxyzine 10 mg
Dose: 1ā2 capsules HS PRN
Indication: Insomnia associated with stress or fibromyalgia
Use: 1ā2 nights/week
Last Fill: March 28, 2025
Vyvanse 60 mg
Dose: 1 cap every morning
Indication: Binge eating disorder, ADHD
Notes: Regular weekly blister pack
Last fill: April 9 2025
š« 5. Migraine & Vestibular Medications
Propranolol 80 mg
Dose: 80 mg BID
Indication: Chronic migraine prophylaxis
Notes: Daily dispense blister
Last fill: April 9 2025
Sumatriptan 5 mg nasal spray
Dose: 1 spray BID PRN
Use: ~4 times/month
Indication: Acute migraine
Last fill: Feb 12, 2025
Sumatriptan 20 mg nasal spray
Earlier fill Jan 2025
Likely same indication
Last fill: Jan 3 2025
Betahistine 16 mg
Dose: 1 tab TID PRN
Indication: Vertigo / vestibular symptoms
Use: Occasional
Last fill: Feb 11 2025
š½ 6. Bladder / Urology Medications
Hyoscine butylbromide 10 mg
Dose: 1 tab q8h PRN (daily dispense)
Indication: Bladder spasms
Notes: Reports partial benefit (**need to keep this**)
Does not use often but would like to have it on hand
Last fill: April 10 2025
Solifenacin 5 mg
Dose: 1 daily (can increase to 10 mg)
Status: Not filled since Dec 2024
Notes: Effective but too expensive; patient stopped (āOn and offā)Ā
Currently prescribed ā> significant improvement of bladder pain while using but cost is a barrier (so maybe thats why it was last filled in 2024)Ā
Colchicine 0.6 mg
Dose: 1 tab daily
Original indication: Knee pain
Notes: No longer clinically needed
Patient confirms she does not have gout or periarditis and believe it was prescribed for knee pain but knee pain is no longer an issueĀ
Last fill: April 9 2025
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox)
Dose: 100 units intravesical
Last fill: Jan 2025
Indication: OAB / bladder pain
History: Received injections 2022 + 2025
š 7. Respiratory / Nasal Steroids
Beclomethasone 50 mcg
Dose: 1 spray each nostril daily
Indication: Allergic rhinitis
Last fill:Ā Feb 28 20255
Mometasone 50 mcg
Dose: 1 spray each nostril daily
Indication: Allergic rhinitis
Last fill:Ā Feb 28 2025
Fluticasone 50 mcg
Dose: Apply HS
Notes: Possibly for dermatitis or nose
Last fill:Ā Feb 28 20255
š¦ 8. Anti-Infectives
Mupirocin ointment
Use: TID
Indication: MRSA decolonization / skin lesions
Last fill: March 31, 2025
DISCONTINUED
Fusidic acid cream
Use: TID
Indication: Skin infections
Last fill: Feb 28 2025
Probably no longer taking?
Cephalexin 500 mg
Use: 1 tab QID until finished
Indication: UTI or soft tissue infection
Last fill:Ā Jan 17, 2025
Probably no longer taking?
Fluconazole 50 mg
Dose: 150 mg weekly (3 tabs)
Indication: Antifungal prophylaxis or recurrent infections
Last fill:Ā Jan 10, 2025
Probably no longer taking?
Nystatin suspension
Dose: 1ā2 mL QID
Indication: Oral candidiasis
Last Filled: Dec13 2024Ā
Probably no longer taking?
š§“ 9. Dermatology
Tretinoin 0.025% cream
Dose: Apply HS
Last fill: Feb 28 2025
Tretinoin 0.04% microspheres
Dose: Apply HS
Last fill: Feb 28 2025
Compounded Phenazopyridine (Pyridium)
Dose: 2 caps TID PRN
Indication: Severe bladder pain
Notes: Very expensive; poor coverage ā affects adherence
Helped but too expensive and not covered by Pharmacare
Last fill:Ā Dec 23 2024
Also given in ED Feb 8 2025
š§ 10. Other
Baclofen
Two forms:
2 mg/mL ampule
10 mg tablets
Indication: Muscle spasm / pelvic pain?
Notes: Use unclear; needs clarification.
Last fill: Feb 1 2025 / Jan 10 2025
āDispense every three days (likely DCd at this point because that was the last dispense)Ā
BPMH Notes
Patient reports:
No OTC/NHPs
No additional meds beyond those listed
On many meds PRN but uses many of them regularly
Trialed oxybutynin in the past for 2 months but discontinued due to lack of effect
šø Immunization Record ā Clinical Summary (for Case Workup)
(Extracted from Provincial Immunization Registry)
ā Completed Vaccinations
COVID-19 (Moderna Spikevax)
Dose 1: Mar 18, 2021
Dose 2: Jun 09, 2021
Hepatitis A
Dose 1: Jan 15, 2016
Dose 2: Mar 05, 2018
ā Complete series
Hepatitis B
Dose 1: Apr 30, 2019
Dose 2: Jun 04, 2019
Dose 3: Nov 05, 2019
ā Complete series
Influenza (inactivated)
2021 Dec 08
2023 Oct 26
2024 Oct 20
ā Up to date on annual flu vaccines
Td (Tetanus/Diphtheria)
Jan 01, 2012
ā Booster overdue
ā Vaccinations Due / Overdue
Vaccine | Due Date | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
MMR | Dec 30, 2006 | Overdue / no record ā unclear if vaccinated in childhood |
Td booster | Jan 01, 2022 | Overdue by 3+ years |
COVID booster | Oct 01, 2025 | Upcoming (not overdue yet) |
Influenza | Oct 01, 2025 | Next seasonal dose due |
ā Adverse events following vaccination
None reported
ā Special Considerations / Risk Factors
No immunization deferrals
No flagged risk factors
ā Important because many chronic pain or bladder patients may be immunosuppressed ā she is not.
šø How this fits into your case presentation
Under Social History or Preventive Care:
You will say something like:
āHer immunizations are mostly up to date. She has completed her Hepatitis A and B series and receives annual influenza vaccinations. Her last tetanus booster was in 2012, so she is due for a Td/Tdap update. She has received two COVID-19 vaccinations but is due for her next booster in October 2025. There are no documented adverse vaccine reactions.ā
Why this matters clinically
Recurrent ED visits + frequent catheter manipulations ā ensure tetanus protection
Chronic bladder pain but not immunocompromised ā vaccinations remain standard
Preventive care is part of comprehensive primary care workup
ā Consult Note #1 ā Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy (April 2024 onward)
(Organized + interpreted for integration into your case workup)
Source Summary (your note rewritten clearly):
Referred for pelvic floor physiotherapy starting April 2024.
Main complaints: bladder spasms + bladder pain.
Symptoms significantly impact quality of life ā prevents swimming and playing in a band.
Initial pelvic floor exam:
Poor awareness
Poor coordination
Poor contraction
Poor relaxation
Improvement over time:
Pelvic floor function improved ~50%
Catheter changes became easier
BUT bladder spasms did not significantly improve.
Physiotherapist recommends continuing therapy and possibly adding:
Pelvic floor work
Electrical muscle stimulation (used for OAB/bladder pain)
Requests physician to provide a re-referral.
šø How I will integrate this into the full workup later
HPI / Bladder Pain Narrative
Chronic pelvic/bladder pain since at least 2024.
Severe functional impairment (unable to swim or participate in music).
Pelvic floor dysfunction confirmed by physiotherapy.
Bladder spasms resistant to pelvic floor improvement.
Past Medical History
Pelvic floor dysfunction (documented + partially responsive to treatment).
Interventions Tried
Pelvic floor physiotherapy (partial improvement).
Catheter changes easier after therapy ā suggests pelvic floor hypertonicity previously.
No relief of bladder spasms ā supportive of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, not purely mechanical.
Future/Plan-Relevant Points
Could justify:
Considering electrical stimulation trial
Continuing physiotherapy
Assessing for central sensitization
Evaluating bladder spasm treatment options (solifenacin, pregabalin, etc.)
šø ED Visit ā Feb 8, 2025: Clean Clinical Summary (For Case Build)
(We will integrate this into your HPI chronologically once you send the rest)
1. Reason for ED Visit
Acute worsening of chronic bladder spasms
2 days after intravesical Botox injection + suprapubic catheter change (Feb 6, 2025)
Symptoms:
RLQ abdominal pain
Increased bladder/perineal pain
Constant but fluctuating
Nausea (no vomiting)
No fever
No bowel movement since Thursday
Catheter draining well
Pain severity:
Hydromorph Contin 15 mg TID + hydromorphone IR 5 mg q4ā6h ā 4 tablets in 24 hours
T3 1 tab q6h
Cyclobenzaprine + ondansetron
Not using NSAIDs at home
2. ED Physician Impression
āAcute on chronic bladder spasms post-Botox. Unlikely UTI. Culture ordered but no antibiotics until ID approves.ā
Key points:
Bladder spasm flare attributed to recent procedure
Urine dip shows trace leukocytes but clinically inconsistent with infection
Follow care plan: culture sent, ID must review before starting antibiotics
Pain improved significantly in ED ā discharged with standard return precautions
3. Past Medical History (Extracted)
Already consistent with your previous list, but confirming:
Interstitial cystitis / chronic bladder pain syndrome
Overactive bladder
Chronic UTIs (on suprapubic catheter)
Urinary retention
Chronic pelvic pain
Depression
Anxiety
Borderline personality disorder
History of self-harm
Chronic migraines
Frequent respiratory infections
Morbid obesity
MRSA carrier
History of lumbar puncture ā opening pressure 22.5 (2020)
Chronic pelvic floor dysfunction
4. Surgical / Procedural History (Updated)
Recent
Feb 6, 2025 ā Cystoscopy + 100U intravesical Botox + SPC exchange
PastNov 2024 ā EGD + colonoscopy
Apr 2023 ā Hysteroscopy + D&C + SPC change
Dec 2022 ā Prior Botox + initial SPC insertion
Right ankle surgeries Ć3
Cholecystectomy
Multiple SPC tract dilations
5. Vitals (Day of Visit)
T 36.7°C
HR 55
RR 16
BP 107/65
SpOā 98%
Interpretation:
Afebrile
No tachycardia
No respiratory compromise despite high CNS-depressant burden
No hemodynamic instability
ā Supports non-infectious etiology for pain.
6. Physical Exam (Summarized & Interpreted)
Appears well, no distress
Lungs: normal
Heart: normal
Abdomen: soft, diffuse lower abdominal tenderness (RLQ & LLQ), no guarding/peritonitis
Perineum/labia: normal, no rash or erythema
ā Findings consistent with bladder spasm flare, not UTI or peritonitis.
7. Lab Results
CBC
Test | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
WBC | 7.1 | Normal ā no leukocytosis |
Hb | 124 | Lower end but within normal |
Plt | 200 | Normal |
Why it matters:
ā Again supports no systemic infection.
Chemistry / Renal
Test | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
Na 139 | normal | |
K 4.0 | normal | |
Cl 100 | normal | |
COā 34 ā | mild metabolic alkalosis pattern | |
Cr 73 | normal | |
eGFR 91 | normal | |
Glucose 5.4 | normal |
Why it matters:
No kidney dysfunction ā infection not affecting kidneys
COā mild elevation (chronic pain hyperventilation or nausea)
Inflammation
Test | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
CRP | 19.8 ā | Mild inflammation |
Pattern:
Too low for acute pyelonephritis (typically >40ā50)
Consistent with chronic bladder inflammation + post-procedure irritation
Urinalysis
Component | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
Leukocytes | āSmallā | Could be chronic SPC irritation |
Nitrites | Negative | No gram-negative bacteriuria |
Blood | Trace | Common with SPC |
Protein | 1 g/L | Chronic bladder inflammation/proteinuria |
Ketones/Bilirubin | Negative | |
Pregnancy test | Negative |
Overall:
UDS not convincing for UTI ā false positives common in catheter users.
8. ED Medications Administered
Ketorolac 30 mg IM
Morphine 5 mg SQ
Ondansetron 4 mg ODT
Phenazopyridine 200 mg PO
ā Pain improved dramatically with this regimen.
9. Allergies (as documented in this visit)
Latex ā rash
Diamox ā severe vomiting
Ciprofloxacin ā hives
Macrobid ā rash, tachycardia
Septra ā itching
Tramacet ā hives
Clindamycin ā dizziness/vomiting
Clindamycin + benzoyl peroxide ā swelling
Macrolides ā arrhythmia, hives
Topiramate ā rash
Tramadol ā rash
We will merge this with your full allergy list later.
šø ED Visit ā March 11, 2025: Clean Clinical Summary (UTI + IV Ertapenem Reassessment)
1. Reason for ED Visit
Here for Day 7 reassessment of IV ertapenem course for known Klebsiella UTI per ID plan.
Important context:
She is a well-known frequent ED return related to bladder pain + SPC
Missed 1 dose the day before ā here for catch-up dose
ID recommended 7ā10 days total; ED extended to 10 days because of missed dose
Symptoms today:
Feeling āa bit betterā
Some mild diarrhea (likely from antibiotic or baseline IBS-like symptoms)
No fever
No systemic symptoms reported
2. ED Physician Impression
āUTI ā continue ertapenem. Complete full 10-day course. Follow ID recommendations.ā
Key points:
They are not questioning the diagnosis here because ID already confirmed Klebsiella on March 4ā6
No signs requiring further ED intervention
Mild diarrhea but tolerating therapy
Affect āflatterā than usual ā possibly pain/fatigue/medications
3. Relevant Past Medical History (Reconfirmed)
Same as prior note; ED reconfirms:
Chronic UTIs (Klebsiella predominant)
Suprapubic catheter ā chronic colonization
Chronic bladder spasms
Psychiatric comorbidities: anxiety, depression, BPD
Chronic migraines
Morbid obesity
MRSA carrier
History of self-harm
Lumbar puncture elevated opening pressure (intracranial hypertension history?)
Chronic urinary retention
4. Vitals (Mar 11, 2025)
T 36.7 °C
HR 65
RR 16
BP 106/55
SpOā 95%
Interpretation:
No fever
No tachycardia
Normal respiratory status
ā Again supports responding to therapy, not worsening infection.
5. Physical Exam Summary
Looks well
Flatter affect than baseline
No acute distress
No unstable findings
Fits with:
Partially treated UTI
Also her baseline chronic pain picture
6. Medications Given in ED
Ertapenem 1 g IV (continuing treatment)
Ketorolac 15 mg IV (pain)
7. Allergies (Reconfirmed)
Same major ones appear again:
Latex
Acetazolamide (Diamox)
Ciprofloxacin
Nitrofurantoin (Macrobid)
TMP-SMX (Septra)
Clindamycin
Macrolides
Topiramate
Tramadol/Tramacet
This ED note further reinforces her extreme antibiotic limitations for UTIs.
8. Diagnostic Data
No new labs shown in the note (they sent labs but results were to be reviewed next day).
However, clinically she looks better ā appropriate progress.
š¼ How This Will Fit into Your Final HPI Timeline Later
March 4ā6, 2025:
ID diagnosed Klebsiella UTI
Started on IV ertapenem for 7ā10 days
March 11, 2025:
ED follow-up after missed dose
Continues IV ertapenem
Mild diarrhea but improving urinary symptoms
No systemic infection features
Plan extended to 10 days
This builds a pattern:
RL has true UTIs only occasionally, usually Klebsiella
Responds to IV carbapenems
But most ED visits are not true UTIs ā theyāre bladder pain flares
ā This supports your Part 2 infographic topic PERFECTLY.
šø How This Fits Into DTPs Later
1. Safety
Repeated IV antibiotics ā C. diff risk
Carbapenem exposure ā antimicrobial resistance risk
Severe antibiotic allergy profile ā limited future options
2. Effectiveness
Recurrent ātreated UTIsā often may not be UTIs ā inappropriate antibiotic use
3. Indication
Need strong differentiation between:
True UTI
BPS flare
Catheter irritation
4. Adherence
Missed dose ā not ideal for severe UTI
Weekly/daily dispenses ā adherence barriers
šø ED Visit ā March 12, 2025: Clean Clinical Summary (Day 8 Ertapenem + Diarrhea Concern)
1. Reason for Visit
Patient presents for Day 8 of IV ertapenem for a confirmed Klebsiella complicated UTI.
Symptoms today:
Ongoing lower abdominal pain/cramping
Diarrhea (non-bloody) ā patient worried about C. difficile
Took morphine overnight, helpful
No morphine used today
No fever
Reports feeling ābetter overallā
Note: This is now the third consecutive ED visit related to this same UTI treatment course.
2. ED Physician Impression / Plan
1. Complicated UTI ā continue ertapenem
Labs from yesterday (Mar 11) reviewed:
Potassium 5.3 (mildly high)
CRP 4 mg/L (very low ā strongly against active systemic infection)
No changes to treatment
Continue ertapenem until March 14
Return the next day for further doses
2. Diarrhea
Suspected antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Non-bloody
Outpatient C. diff test requisition provided
No concerning dehydration or systemic symptoms
3. Detailed History Extracted
This physician knows her well (āknown to myselfā)
This is Day 2 of this physicianās encounters but Day 8 of ertapenem course
Chronic bladder spasms complicate picture
Her pain improved enough that she did not need morphine today
No red flags
4. Vitals (Mar 12, 2025)
T 36.7 °C
HR 71
RR 17
BP 94/65 (soft but OK; she is often low-normal BP)
SpOā 97%
Interpretation:
Afebrile
Hemodynamically stable
No respiratory compromise
Consistent with improving infection
5. Physical Exam
Appears well
No distress
Abdomen: soft, obese, mild suprapubic discomfort only
No guarding
No rebound
Good perfusion
ā No signs of peritonitis, acute abdomen, or severe infection
ā Fits with improving UTI & diarrhea likely antibiotic-associated
6. Relevant Lab Data (from Mar 11, but referenced in this note)
Electrolytes
K 5.3 mmol/L ā mild
ā usually transient, likely not dangerous
ā no renal impairment
Inflammation
CRP 4 mg/L
ā almost normal
ā absolutely not consistent with ongoing/acute UTI
ā supports improving course
(No CBC results shown in this note; likely normal or unchanged.)
7. Procedure & Past History (same as prior notes)
No new surgeries or PMH added.
8. ED Medications
Ertapenem 1 g IV
Ketorolac 15 mg IV
9. Allergies (Reconfirmed Again)
No changes ā same severe antimicrobial allergy profile.
šø What This Adds to Her Timeline
This note emphasizes:
ā She has true UTIs sometimes ā but they behave predictably:
Klebsiella, occasionally pseudomonas in the past
She clinically improves with carbapenems
Doesnāt develop fevers, leukocytosis, or high CRP
Symptoms improve gradually
ā Her diarrhea is probably antibiotic-associated, not C. diff:
Non-bloody
CRP low
No abdominal findings
She is not systemically sick
ā Important for Part 2 infographic
This is PERFECT evidence for your SDM topic:
How to tell a UTI from a bladder pain flare.
This ED note shows:
Pain from bladder spasm vs pain from UTI often look similar
Infection indicators (fever, high CRP, high WBC) are absent
Symptoms improved without any extra interventions
Diarrhea = a side effect of treatment, not infection worsening
ā Important for DTPs
Risk of C. diff from frequent antibiotics
Reinforces the need for a UTI action plan
Reinforces need for a decision aid
Shows how often she receives antibiotics even when not always necessary
Shows the danger of broad-spectrum exposure
Highlights antibiotic stewardship needs
šø General Referral Form ā Clinical Summary (Polypharmacy & Bladder Pain Referral)
Reason for Referral (as written on the form)
Polypharmacy
Complex bladder pain
UTI prophylaxis
Bladder instillations for pain
This is HUGE because it clearly states the exact issues they want addressed ā which become natural priority DTPs for your presentation.
š¼ What This Tells Us Clinically
ā 1. Polypharmacy is officially documented as a concern
This isnāt just something we noticed ā clinicians are formally worried about it.
This supports making:
Safety your first priority category
A clear deprescribing plan for:
Opioids
Cyclobenzaprine
Nabilone
Hydroxyzine
Benzodiazepines
Duplicate/ineffective bladder meds
Unnecessary colchicine
Unnecessary B12 supplements
AND it gives full justification for addressing it in the first visit.
ā 2. Complex bladder pain is a key issue
This aligns with:
Her diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis / Bladder Pain Syndrome
Chronic suprapubic catheter pain
Pelvic floor dysfunction
High ED usage
Recent Botox injections
Chronic bladder spasm refractory to treatment
It validates that bladder pain is one of her core clinical problems, not secondary.
ā 3. UTI prophylaxis is being directly requested
This confirms:
She has a history of true UTIs (Klebsiella + Pseudomonas)
Providers want a long-term plan
Antibiotic allergies complicate treatment
Thereās interest in non-antibiotic prophylaxis
Methenamine
Cranberry PAC
Vaginal estrogen (not for her though; age 37 might still be appropriate depending on cycles)
Immunoprophylaxis
Behavioral strategies
Catheter hygiene optimization
This also ties PERFECTLY into your SDM infographic topic.
ā 4. Bladder Instillations Requested
This implies:
Providers believe her pain is inflammatory, not infectious
Instillation options would include:
Lidocaine/heparin
Sodium bicarbonate
DMSO
Hyaluronic acid
Chondroitin sulfate
This reinforces the concept of chronic non-infectious bladder pain and the need to differentiate it from UTIs.
šø How This Will Integrate Into Your Final Workup
Under āReason for Referralā / HPI:
Youāll say something like:
āShe was referred specifically for assistance with polypharmacy management, chronic bladder pain, evaluation for UTI prophylaxis options, and consideration of bladder instillation therapy.ā
Under āAssessmentā (Problem List):
You can clearly list:
Polypharmacy with high-risk CNS depressant stacking
Chronic bladder pain / BPS with suprapubic catheter
Recurrent UTIs (Klebsiella), complicated by severe antibiotic allergy profile
Need for long-term UTI prophylaxis strategy
Consideration of bladder instillations
Under āPriority DTPsā (Professor emphasized this):
This referral confirms the top problems your professors expect you to focus on.
Priority order (safety ā effectiveness ā indication ā adherence):
Safety: CNS depressant polypharmacy
Safety: frequent broad-spectrum antibiotics ā C. diff risk
Effectiveness: bladder pain poorly controlled
Effectiveness: unclear UTI prophylaxis strategy
Indication: unnecessary colchicine/B12/duplicate therapies
Adherence: cost barriers + complex dosing schedule
This referral directly justifies this ordering.
šø ED Note ā March 24, 2025: Flank Pain Episode
Why this encounter matters:
This is a perfect example of how her bladder pain + catheter + menstrual cycle + chronic inflammation create pseudo-infectious symptoms that LOOK like pyelonephritis or obstructing stone ā but labs donāt support infection.
This strongly supports:
ā Chronic bladder pain syndrome
ā High ED utilization
ā Difficulty distinguishing UTI vs flare
ā The clinical need for patient decision aids (your infographic fits PERFECTLY)
ā High opioid use because pain is severe and poorly controlled
ā Repeated unnecessary cultures and imaging
š¼ Clinical Summary of This Encounter
Chief complaint:
Lower abdominal pain ā now radiating to right flank
Pain comes in waves
Heavy menstrual flow today
āCloudy urine,ā bladder spasms
Took naproxen 1500h
Sweaty but unsure about fever
Pain different from usual bladder spasm pain ā triggered ED visit
šø Assessment from ED
⨠Vitals normal
Afebrile (36.7)
HR stable
BP normal
SpO2 98%
⨠Labs
WBC 10.9 (upper-normal, not convincing for infection)
CRP 14.4 mg/L (mild elevation)
ā Nonspecific, could be menstrual inflammation, bladder pain flare, or stoneUA:
Moderate blood
Small leukocytes
Nitrite negative
NO protein
NO ketones
This UA screams stone, catheter irritation, or flare, NOT UTI.
⨠Imaging
KUB X-ray normal
No gross stone visible, but ultrasound ordered for higher sensitivity
⨠Treatment
Given ketorolac IM
Sent home on her own morphine
Culture ordered but cancelled as duplicate
š Clinical Significance
This note adds several crucial findings for your workup:
1. Her bladder pain is not always infectious
Repeated ED visits with:
Normal vitals
Mild leukocytes
Hematuria +/-
Pain ā infection
Supports chronic bladder/pelvic pain syndrome + catheter-related irritation.
2. Chronic hematuria ā stone suspicion
She has intermittent hematuria (seen on other UAs too).
This supports:
Possible stones
Catheter irritation
Chronic bladder inflammation
3. Menstrual cycle exacerbates bladder/pelvic pain
Pain peaked on day 1 of period.
Classic in chronic pelvic pain, BPS, and pelvic floor dysfunction.
4. MASSIVE clinical justification for your decision aid
This encounter is basically BEGGING for an educational tool about:
āHow to tell UTI from flare / catheter irritation / menstruation / stone painā
Your infographic becomes even more clinically grounded.
5. Opioid reliance continues
She was told to use āmorphine at home.ā
High CNS/sedation risk.
Polypharmacy remains a top priority.
š¼ How This Will Fit into Your Case Presentation
Under HPI / Clinical Pattern:
āRepeated ED presentations for flank/bladder pain with stable vitals and non-specific labs ā consistent with chronic suprapubic catheter irritation, pelvic pain, and bladder pain syndrome rather than recurrent UTI.ā
Under Problem List:
Chronic bladder/pelvic pain with episodic severe flares
Recurrent ED visits due to unclear distinction between UTI vs pain flare
Chronic low-level hematuria
Recurrent unnecessary cultures
High opioid reliance for pain crises
Stressors around menstruation worsening symptoms
Under DTPs:
Effectiveness Issue: Pain poorly controlled despite high-intensity regimen
Safety Issue: Recurrent exposure to NSAIDs + opioids + cyclobenzaprine
Safety Issue: Over-evaluation for infection ā unnecessary cultures/antibiotics
Effectiveness Need: Clear care pathway + prophylaxis + flare plan
Under SDM Opportunities:
What to do during a flare
When to seek ED
When antibiotics are appropriate or not
Pain plan adjustments
šø A. MOST RECENT LABS (March 11, 2025)
This is the set we will use for the current case.
ā CBC ā NORMAL
WBC 7.4
Hgb 125
Platelets 218
MPV is mildly decreased at 9.0. Low MPV reflects smaller, older platelets and is often seen with chronic inflammation, chronic pain, and iron deficiencyāall of which this patient has. Platelet count is normal, so no action is needed.ā
No leukocytosis
No anemia
No thrombocytosis or thrombocytopenia
ā” Interpretation:
No acute infection, no anemia of chronic disease, no major hematologic abnormalities.
ā Chemistry ā Almost Entirely Normal EXCEPT:
1) Potassium 5.3 (High) (RR = 3.5-5.0)
This is mild hyperkalemia.
Likely causes in this patient:
NSAID use? (she was not taking them consistently)
Mild dehydration
Lab variation
Pain/stress
Muscle relaxants rarely
Opioids donāt cause hyperK
Not from kidney disease (Cr 65, eGFR 105 = excellent)
ā” Clinically: very mild, not concerning, but worth monitoring since she has polypharmacy.
2) COā (bicarbonate proxy) = 32 (High) (RR = 22-31)Ā
This suggests:
Mild metabolic alkalosis OR
Chronic compensation for respiratory acidosis (COPD style ā but she does NOT have COPD)
Most likely:
Chronic hyperventilation/pain response, frequent vomiting/nausea episodes, OR unrelated variation.
Not dangerous.
3) CRP 4.0 (slightly elevated) (RR < 3.1)Ā
Interpretation from CRP chart:
3.1ā10 = mild inflammation, could be viral or mild bacterial flare
In this patient ā
She is on IV ertapenem at the time and improving.
This CRP is consistent with resolving infection.
Not highly elevated.
ā Renal
Creatinine 65
eGFR 105
ā” Perfect kidney function (important for methenamine, NSAIDs, opioids, and antibiotic choices)
šø B. Previous Labs (Trend Summary)
This is where the āØclinical thinking⨠gets juicy.
Across ALL previous labs from 2024ā2025:
ā 1) CBC is always normal
This means:
No chronic infection
No untreated anemia
No immunocompromise
No marrow suppression
š Important for polypharmacy review (many of her meds cause sedation but not blood issues).
ā 2) Creatinine ALWAYS normal (60ā78)
ā She has stable kidney function
ā She is a good candidate for methenamine if we propose it
ā Long-term antibiotics wonāt be nephrotoxic for her
ā Opioids are safe from a renal perspective
ā 3) CRP fluctuates:
Jan 2025 = 5.3
Mar 4 = CRP 19
Mar 11 = CRP 4
Mar 24 = CRP 14
Apr 1 = CRP 11
Apr 18 = CRP 23
This pattern = chronic low-grade inflammation, typical of:
Chronic bladder pain
Suprapubic catheter irritation
Recurrent colonization / mild infection
Chronic pain syndromes in general
Recurrent urologic procedures
Occasional true UTI episodes
Chronic inflammatory conditions
But importantly, not high enough to confirm complicated systemic infection.
This supports our narrative:
She frequently presents to ED with pain flares + mild markers but not true sepsis.
ā 4) Ferritin repeatedly low (20ā21)
The guideline says:
āProbable iron deficiency.ā
YES bestie!!
She is iron deficient.
This explains:
fatigue
pain amplification
poor healing
possibly perpetuating chronic symptoms
⨠This is a GREAT DTP to include in polypharmacy assessment. āØ
ā 5) Vitamin B12 high (1061)
Likely from supplementation (common).
Not clinically concerning.
šø C. What These Labs Mean for Your Case Workup
⨠1. She does NOT have major infection markers
Even during āUTIā ED visits:
WBC normal
CRP mildly elevated
No fevers
No hypotension
ā This supports:
She often has bladder pain flares mistaken for UTIs.
This is GOLD for your case rationale.
⨠**2. Her kidneys are great ā
She can use methenamine, NSAIDs short-term, and most bladder therapies.**
⨠**3. She has real chronic inflammation ā
Bladder instillations are appropriate to consider**
(because they target urothelial lining inflammation)
⨠**4. No anemia ā
But iron deficiency is emerging**
(another DTP!)