knowt logo

Global Media Culture

  • WORLD CULTURE THEORY

    • Somehow Related to Global Media Culture

  • INTERNATIONAL MASS MEDIA

    • Plays a vital role in enhancing GLOBALIZATION, especially when they want to interact globally.

    • Exchange of ideas, culture, and multiple information.

3 PARADIGM / ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES OF MEDIA GLOBALIZATION

  1. COMMUNICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT VIEW

    • Also known as Modernization Paradigm.

    • Something to do with Mass Media.

    • Media as AGENT OF CHANGE in developing countries with its capacity to ALTER values and attitudes towards modernization.

    • MODERNIZATION + TECHNOLOGY = MASS MEDIA.

  2. CULTURAL IMPERIALISM

    • Domination of one’s culture over another.

    • COLONIZATION.

    • Influencing one’s culture over another.

  3. CULTURAL PLURALISM

    • Optimistic view of the diversity of the global media platforms/relations.

    • There are variety of cultures and tradition.

    • RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY.

  • HISTORY OF THE FIRST PARADIGM

    • Started during the post WWII (countries’ economies dropped).

    • How mass media are used.

    • Absence of modernization is due to the lack of human resources, education, and mass media.

  • MASS MEDIA

    • Link societies closer with the exchange of ideas, culture, & multiple information.

    • Fundamental of building capital

  • ANTECEDENTS

    • Different issues, concerns + the media, & the consequences to modernization.

    • Roger’s model of mass media exposure & modernization.

  • SOCIO - ECONOMIC ANTECEDENT

    • Would determine the capacity of mass media exposure to the modernization.

  • HISTORY OF THE SECOND PARADIGM

    • Imperialism - Politics

    • Colonization, Decolonization, Postcolonialism

    • HAVANA DECLARATION IN 1970s.

    • Uneven flow of information.

    • Cultural Imperialism - free market is involved.

    • Media Imperialism - Use of mass media in dominating one’s culture.

    • Paved the way for the entry of western based transnational corporation.

  • CULTURAL IMPERIALISM THEORY

    • Creation and Maintenance of UNEQUAL RELATIONSHIPS between civilization, favoring the more powerful countries.

    • Developed by Herbs Schiller (1970s).

  • CRITICISM OF CULTURAL IMPERIALISM PARADIGM

    • Against its theoretical coherence.

    • Romanticizing the national as an agent of resistance which could be oppressive and homogenizing.

    • The theory may have to be reevaluated as the new media penetrate into developing nations.

  • CULTURAL PLURALISM

    • Homogenization to Heterrogenization.

    • Results of criticisms against imperialism.

    • “Cultural Globalization”

    • One way to mulidirectional flows.

  • CRITICISMS OF HETEROGENIZATION

    • Systematically marginazing the role of the State (think global, act global).

    • Neglect of the economic clout of global media firms.

    • Concentration in the United States.

    • It is not also reflective of the assumptions of the paradigm.

    • The power it provides the audience without taking into account the inequality of their access to media and communications.

Global Media Culture

  • WORLD CULTURE THEORY

    • Somehow Related to Global Media Culture

  • INTERNATIONAL MASS MEDIA

    • Plays a vital role in enhancing GLOBALIZATION, especially when they want to interact globally.

    • Exchange of ideas, culture, and multiple information.

3 PARADIGM / ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES OF MEDIA GLOBALIZATION

  1. COMMUNICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT VIEW

    • Also known as Modernization Paradigm.

    • Something to do with Mass Media.

    • Media as AGENT OF CHANGE in developing countries with its capacity to ALTER values and attitudes towards modernization.

    • MODERNIZATION + TECHNOLOGY = MASS MEDIA.

  2. CULTURAL IMPERIALISM

    • Domination of one’s culture over another.

    • COLONIZATION.

    • Influencing one’s culture over another.

  3. CULTURAL PLURALISM

    • Optimistic view of the diversity of the global media platforms/relations.

    • There are variety of cultures and tradition.

    • RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY.

  • HISTORY OF THE FIRST PARADIGM

    • Started during the post WWII (countries’ economies dropped).

    • How mass media are used.

    • Absence of modernization is due to the lack of human resources, education, and mass media.

  • MASS MEDIA

    • Link societies closer with the exchange of ideas, culture, & multiple information.

    • Fundamental of building capital

  • ANTECEDENTS

    • Different issues, concerns + the media, & the consequences to modernization.

    • Roger’s model of mass media exposure & modernization.

  • SOCIO - ECONOMIC ANTECEDENT

    • Would determine the capacity of mass media exposure to the modernization.

  • HISTORY OF THE SECOND PARADIGM

    • Imperialism - Politics

    • Colonization, Decolonization, Postcolonialism

    • HAVANA DECLARATION IN 1970s.

    • Uneven flow of information.

    • Cultural Imperialism - free market is involved.

    • Media Imperialism - Use of mass media in dominating one’s culture.

    • Paved the way for the entry of western based transnational corporation.

  • CULTURAL IMPERIALISM THEORY

    • Creation and Maintenance of UNEQUAL RELATIONSHIPS between civilization, favoring the more powerful countries.

    • Developed by Herbs Schiller (1970s).

  • CRITICISM OF CULTURAL IMPERIALISM PARADIGM

    • Against its theoretical coherence.

    • Romanticizing the national as an agent of resistance which could be oppressive and homogenizing.

    • The theory may have to be reevaluated as the new media penetrate into developing nations.

  • CULTURAL PLURALISM

    • Homogenization to Heterrogenization.

    • Results of criticisms against imperialism.

    • “Cultural Globalization”

    • One way to mulidirectional flows.

  • CRITICISMS OF HETEROGENIZATION

    • Systematically marginazing the role of the State (think global, act global).

    • Neglect of the economic clout of global media firms.

    • Concentration in the United States.

    • It is not also reflective of the assumptions of the paradigm.

    • The power it provides the audience without taking into account the inequality of their access to media and communications.

robot