Exam Review Notes on Wrongful Convictions and Innocence

Exam Overview

  • Exam Date: April 11th from 7 PM – 9 PM
  • Location: CHA213
  • Weight: 40% of final grade
  • Format: Multiple-choice (concept-based, not fact-based)
  • Preparation Note: Review as a study guide, but it won't cover everything; some material might not appear on the exam.

Exam Topics

  • Introduction to Wrongful Conviction
  • The Legal System: Police Investigations
  • The Legal System: Courts
  • The Legal System: Potential Solutions Before Wrongful Conviction
  • The Experience of Wrongful Incarceration
  • The Narratives of Wrongful Conviction
  • Innocence Organizations During Wrongful Incarceration
  • Righting a Wrongful Conviction
  • Reintegrating into Society
  • Media and Public Perceptions Post-Exoneration

Introduction to Wrongful Conviction

  • Eyewitness Misidentification:
    • Incorrect identification of a suspect by a witness/victim
    • Accounts for nearly 30% of wrongful convictions.
    • Memory Factors:
    • Estimator Variables: External factors (age, race, lighting, etc.)
    • System Variables: Police-controlled factors (line-up procedures, witness instructions).

The Legal System: Police Investigations

  • Tunnel Vision:
    • Ignoring contradictory evidence to maintain a specific theory.
  • Bias Types in Police:
    • Confirmation Bias: Seeking evidence that supports existing beliefs.
    • Hindsight Bias: Reevaluating decisions based on outcomes.
    • Outcome Bias: Judging decisions based on known results.
  • Police Misconduct: Illegal actions that influence outcomes, such as planting evidence.
  • False Confessions:
    • Contribute to 13-15% of exonerations.
    • Types:
    • Voluntary: No pressure, willingly confessed.
    • Stress-Compliant: Confesses due to exhaustion.
    • Coerced-Compliant: Confesses for a reward.
    • Coerced-Persuaded: Confensed after prolonged interrogation.
    • Influenced by personal characteristics (age, mental health).

The Legal System: Courts

  • Prosecutor Misconduct:
    • Concealing exculpatory evidence or presenting unreliable evidence.
    • Presenting flawed scientific evidence or unfair jury manipulations.
  • Defense Attorney Misconduct:
    • Failure to investigate, ethical violations, ineffective assistance of counsel.
    • Underfunding issues among public defenders with racial biases.
  • Judicial Influence:
    • Judges have discretion impacting wrongful convictions based on admissibility of evidence.

The Legal System: Potential Solutions

  • Best Practices for Police Lineups:
    • Utilize live over photo line-ups, ensure double-blind procedures, and record identifications.
  • Mitigating Tunnel Vision:
    • Train officers to avoid jumping to conclusions.
  • Conviction Integrity Units: Org focused on identifying/remedying false convictions.

The Legal System: Wrongful Incarceration

  • Institutionalization:
    • Psychological impacts of imprisonment (dependence, PTSD).
  • Research on Prison Experiences:
    • Innocent inmates often face unique challenges and stigma.

Righting a Wrongful Conviction

  • Canadian Appeal Process: 6-18 months; outcomes include dismissal or retrial.
  • Post-Convictions Reviews: Conducted after appeal exhaustion; can revisit cases if new information emerges.

Reintegrating into Society

  • Barriers:
    • Financial, mental health, employment, and societal perception barriers post-release.
  • Post-Traumatic Growth:
    • Positive change post-trauma; can involve relational improvements and personal growth.

Perceptions Post-Exoneration

  • Exonerees face societal stigma despite public stating they don't stigmatize.
  • Race and confession type influence public perception; exoneration perceptions can change through education and media representation.

Media Representations

  • False narratives regarding innocence can perpetuate stigma.
  • Positive outcomes can result from accurate media portrayals leading to better public understanding and support for compensation.
  • Expungement Issues: Statistically linked to re-offending; highlights need for public awareness and improvement in supporting exonerees.