Reducing Burnout in Athletes
REDUCING BURNOUT IN ATHLETES
WHAT IS BURNOUT?
Definition and Origins
Significant roots in occupational psychology.
Initially observed in the 1970s, primarily among those in caring professions.
Associated researchers:
Freudenberger (1974)
Maslach & Pines (1977)
Maslach's Definition:
Described as a “multidimensional syndrome that theoretically arises as a consequence of work stress.”
Three Main Symptoms:
Emotional Exhaustion
Cynicism
Reduced Professional Efficacy
WHAT IS BURNOUT?
Burnout in athletes wasn’t not really studied until 2000s
The study of burnout among athletes only gained traction in the 2000s.
Raedeke & Smith (2001)
Restructured the traditional symptoms to better suit athlete contexts:
Physical and Emotional Exhaustion
Devaluation or Cynicism directed specifically at sport
Reduced Sense of Accomplishment
Developed the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ) as a measurement tool:
Declared the “gold standard” for athlete burnout measurement.
Comprises 15 items, with 5 items for each category of symptoms listed above.
Uses a Likert scale to gauge the frequency of symptoms.
Applicable across various ages and competitive levels.
HOW DOES BURNOUT DEVELOP? - THREE THEORIES
Smith’s (1986) Cognitive-Affective Model
Proposes burnout develops due to chronic stress resulting from:
An imbalance between demands in training and athletes' coping resources.
Chronic imbalance can lead to negative emotions (e.g., anxiety) and rigid behaviors such as withdrawal, which subsequently cause burnout.
Behavioral response is development of burnout
Raedeke’s (1997) Commitment Model
Defines commitment as the desire and resolve to participate in sports:
Three factors influencing commitment:
Enjoyment of the activity.
Perceived attractiveness of alternative activities.
Perceived constraints on withdrawal from sport.
Different perceptions of these factors inform if participation stems from enjoyment or entrapment.
Entrapment:
Described as feeling obligated to participate (“because I have to”) instead of wanting to, which can lead to burnout.
Raedeke’s say feeling like you have to participate in a sport leads to a decrease in intrinsic motivation, further exacerbating feelings of burnout and disengagement from the sport.
Deci and Ryan’s (2002) Self-Determination Theory
Argues that social and environmental conditions can either satisfy or thwart basic human needs, specifically:
Autonomy
Relatedness
Competence
Athletes facing a controlling environment (e.g., an authoritative coach) may have needs thwarted, develop extrinsic motives for participation, and ultimately face burnout.
KEY TAKEAWAYS ON BURNOUT DEVELOPMENT
A substantial number of studies link stress to burnout. (Lin et al., 2021)
Perfectionism is also closely associated with burnout. (Hill & Curran, 2016)
Commitment serves as a vital correlate to burnout. (Woods et al., 2020)
Burnout is regularly connected with need thwarting and maladaptive forms of motivation, particularly controlling types.
WHY IS BURNOUT IMPORTANT?
Common misconceptions about athletes include the assumption that they are entirely healthy and less prone to mental health issues:
This assumption is inaccurate; burnout exemplifies this issue.
Research indicates that despite low to moderate averages of burnout, a significant percentage of athletes still experience moderate to severe levels. (Gustafsson et al., 2007)
Trends suggest that levels of burnout tend to increase as the sports season progresses, leading to more severe symptoms.
Burnout's link to mental health, well-being, and performance impairments includes:
Depression
Worry
Anxiety
Performance Impairment
Disengagement from sport activities.
REDUCING BURNOUT IN ATHLETES
Possible interventions can address factors at the individual level (e.g., stress management training) and the organizational level (e.g., adjusting work hours).
Three key studies have tested intervention effectiveness for athletes:
Focused on self-regulation, gratitude, and self-determination theory.
All three studies reported beneficial outcomes on athlete burnout to some extent.
Notably, only one study employed a randomized controlled design, which is preferred for robust evidence guiding practice.
There exists a limited base of information to formulate broad recommendations for assisting athletes.
Extensive burnout research exists in contexts outside of sports.
OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BURNOUT
Individual Interventions:
Resulted in significant reductions in burnout in approximately 35% of cases; effectiveness can vary.
Predominantly successful interventions employed cognitive-based therapies to alleviate stress:
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Stress Management Techniques
Relaxation Techniques
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
These methods work by altering underlying thought processes while maintaining a present, non-judgmental awareness.
Most success identified in contexts such as teachers, nurses, and physicians.
Organizational Interventions:
These approaches showed effective outcomes in approximately 85% of cases compared to individual interventions.
Principal methods include:
Altering Workload:
Techniques such as reducing work hours and shortening shift lengths.
Enhancing Team Dynamics:
Focused on improving communication on interpersonal and hierarchical levels.
Studies primarily included physician populations; generalizability remains uncertain.
INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTIONS
Combination Interventions:
Mixed interventions were effective at reducing burnout 57% of the time, combining strategies from both categories:
Stress Management
Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy: Focused on identifying and changing irrational beliefs.
Improvements in communication strategies.
KEY FINDINGS
Effectiveness of Burnout Interventions:
Evidence supports that burnout interventions can be effective!
Organizational interventions tend to be more effective than individual interventions.
Individual interventions are more widely utilized.
Most studies have centered on physician organizations.
Applicability to athletes and sport organizations:
Both individual and organizational strategies could be relevant in sports contexts.
Most Effective Individual Intervention:
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is emphasized for helping athletes manage stress by reframing situations as less stressful.
Organizational Interventions in Sports:
May benefit from utilizing Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a foundational approach to understanding the impact of environment on athlete wellness.
Consideration of both individual and organizational methods is advisable for effective intervention.
Sport-specific interventions should be designed targeting both the athlete's domain and those impacting their experience (e.g., coaches).
Enhancing awareness and understanding of burnout among athletes and coaches is critical to recognizing symptoms in oneself or others.
Prevention strategies, especially early intervention, are paramount to reducing burnout scenarios.
VIDEO & READINGS
The Burnout Is Real: Tips for Understanding and Avoiding Burnout (YouTube)
Keeping the Sparks Aflame: Preventing and Addressing Burnout in High School Student-Athletes | Association for Applied Sport Psychology
SUMMARY
Athletes remain at high risk for burnout, yet there is limited insight into effective intervention methods when symptoms arise.
Insights from outside the sports realm can inform interventions:
Cognitive-based individual interventions and SDT-based organizational strategies provide a sound foundation for developing sport-specific interventions.
This framework equips practitioners with the necessary means to recognize, prevent, and mitigate burnout among athletes.