W2 - Poetry

Overview and Platforms

  • Everything to do with assignments is listed here; you can always go to the Gradebook for assignments.

  • You always go to Discussions for workshops, sign-ups, and related activities.

  • Lecture notes, weekly summaries, syllabus, content, activities, interactions, discussions, workshops, grade book, and self-explanatory assignments are the core resources—the “gold standard” for breaking things down step by step.

  • In your student preview, remember to click on Instructions when you go to Gradebook; Submission views show feedback signs when you submit.

  • The instructor uses an example with an informal grade (e.g., there’s an F shown to illustrate the viewing of submissions) to demonstrate submission status.

  • When submitting via Gradebook, you’ll see indicators like "Submit now" and various status icons.

  • Block two is the workshop-focused block; block three revisits what we did and continues the practice, including kick-starting a poem for next week (theme: a poem about place).

  • The weekly syllabus and schedule specify topics for poems; you’ll see under the weekly schedule the assigned poem topics.

  • There may be more questions about presentations, which will be addressed in this session.

  • Highlights of the workshop include discussions about what presentations are all about and the lead-in time in block three for the kick-start activity.

  • Sign-ups for presentations are located in the designated area; it’s a self sign-up, first-come, first-serve system.

  • Example acknowledgement: “Thank you, Elliot.”

  • Blackboard offers a short summary, but you should also consult deeper details in the course materials; you are encouraged to study with more detail if you want.

  • The instructor emphasizes that students should not simply rely on Blackboard’s summary; you should dive deeper and study thoroughly.

  • The instructor personally shares that they like to provide a lot of detail so students can decide how much they want to engage with.

Workshop Blocks and Weekly Theme

  • Three-block structure for the course: Block 1 (foundations), Block 2 (workshop), Block 3 (kick-start for next week’s poem).

  • Block 2 centers on the workshop format; Block 3 focuses on continuing practice and planning for the upcoming poem on place.

  • The weekly schedule notes that you will be assigned topics for your poems; these topics are consistently detailed in the syllabus.

  • The weekly workshop includes a focus on presentations and the lead time for kickoff activities in Block 3.

Group Formation and Sign-Up Policy

  • Blackboard is configured to randomly assign five groups of four students each: 5extgroupsof4<br>ightarrow5imes4=20.5 ext{ groups of } 4 <br>ightarrow 5 imes 4 = 20.

  • Group formation is designed to manage workshop discussions and peer feedback efficiently.

  • Presentations sign-ups are self-managed by students; it’s a viable method to ensure fair access to presentation slots.

  • The sign-up policy is explicitly described as First Come, First Serve.

Presentations: Preparation, Submission, and Grading

  • If you’re doing a presentation, you would complete a questionnaire before you start presenting.

  • The completed questionnaire is uploaded to Gradebook with your name and the required details.

  • You must replicate the exact structure: include the title of the poem, the author, the source, and the presentation date.

  • The instructor will mark whether you read the poem aloud (circle: Yes).

  • Save the questionnaire under your name and in the specified title format.

  • Students generally submit poems before the deadline; formatting and submission are tracked.

  • Grading framework for a presentation:

    • The presentation is worth 5 points.

    • Uploading your materials (the questionnaire and related materials) is worth 5 points.

    • Total potential: extTotalpoints=10=5+5.ext{Total points} = 10 = 5 + 5.

  • A key grading criterion is demonstrating thoughtful, skill-based understanding and application in classroom workshop discussions (not just generic praise).

  • For exemplars, the instructor references past colleagues’ presentations and their approach (including linking to the source) to illustrate expected quality.

  • Uploads can include a live link to the source; this is aesthetically pleasing and professional but does not yield extra marks.

  • In terms of specifics, at least one quotation from the chosen poem must be included as part of the presentation material.

  • A well-prepared presentation includes material from the poem, a clear demonstration of reading aloud, and a thoughtful analysis rather than solely subjective praise.

Digital Poetry Bookshelf and Weekly Readings

  • The course features a Digital Poetry Bookshelf, specifically the Digital Canada Poetry in Canada Digital Poetry Bookshelf.

  • The bookshelf is highly diverse, reflecting genders, backgrounds, indigeneity, BIPOC, etc.—a deliberate representation of the community.

  • Students pick one poem from the bookshelf to respond to; each entry includes the poet’s bio, a poetic statement, and the poem itself.

  • The instructor provides a colleague example (e.g., Adi) who has a new book out, with a bio, poetic statement, and a sample poem.

  • The platform showcases a broad body of poetic work from poets around the world, offering diversity in nationality and life experience.

  • Poems are posted every Tuesday; the poets range from traditional to experimental, using various craft elements.

  • An example poem discussed: Connell Smiley’s "Propheces" (a sample title referenced during a reading exercise).

  • Reading practice is integrated into the workshop, focusing on close reading and internals such as sounds and beats in lines.

Reading, Pronunciation, and In-Session Practice

  • In class, readers practice aloud by reading stanzas together to feel the rhythm and sounds.

  • Emphasis on listening for vowel sounds and cadence (e.g., noticing variations like u and a sounds) to inform performance and interpretation.

  • The instructor models reading and invites students to participate in a structured way to build confidence with the text.

Presentations, Materials, and Peer Feedback Workflow

  • After presenting, you complete a questionnaire and upload it to Gradebook with your name and poem details.

  • The instructor will download uploaded materials (e.g., from discussion threads) to project during class.

  • When presenting in front of the class, you can use the uploaded materials as a display reference (the instructor can pull up the poem on screen).

  • You may choose to live-link to the poem’s source; this helps demonstrate the provenance of your chosen work.

  • A well-executed presentation includes a single quotation from the poem as a concrete example.

  • Some presenters may adopt more elaborate formats (e.g., linking to external sources or including visuals); however, extra embellishments do not yield extra marks unless they contribute to the learning objectives.

Draft Submissions, File Formats, and Organization

  • Students are asked to upload their draft poems week after week and save them in Word format (preferred) rather than letting Blackboard convert to PDF.

  • The first line of the file name should include your name (e.g., "Martin …").

  • The instructor commends impeccable formatting and notes that many entries demonstrate strong quality; those who forget formatting are reminded to adjust.

  • In the UBC creative writing context, the practice is different: there is less lecture content and more emphasis on draft forms and active participation from the outset.

  • Students log into class with the draft forms and submit them usually a week in advance; instructors mark and provide feedback.

  • Forms used in workshops are varied and tailored (e.g., imagery form, sound form, etc.).

  • The process emphasizes capturing thoughts in writing during the workshop and then polishing for submission by the due date.

  • Each form captures a specific focus, with two primary questions guiding the discussion in workshop sessions.

  • Using a voice memo to record workshop discussions is encouraged; transcripts can be generated later to create a rough draft.

  • The process supports iterative development: everything you create in this class should be saved in a drafts folder (on phone, tablet, or computer) to maintain a complete record.

  • A recurring reminder: the workshop is the main activity for the next eight weeks; the overall aim is to practice and improve poetry writing through iterative critique and discussion.

Questions, Support, and Accessibility

  • If any student experiences extreme anxiety about presenting, they should see the instructor after class for accommodations or alternative arrangements.

  • Audience members are encouraged to ask questions after a presentation to foster a collaborative learning environment.

  • Students should come prepared with questions for their peers and engage actively in the discussion.

Practical Implications and Real-World Relevance

  • The course mirrors real-world collaborative writing environments where planning, drafts, feedback, and revision cycles drive improvement.

  • The blend of asynchronous resources (Gradebook, Blackboard content, the Digital Poetry Bookshelf) and live practice (presentations, workshops) models how professionals manage projects with multiple channels.

  • The emphasis on ethical practice (e.g., no AI-generated content; iterative editing and citation of sources) aligns with academic integrity in creative disciplines.

  • The structure supports developing both technical skills (poetry craft, quotation use, close reading) and soft skills (presentation, peer feedback, professional formatting).

Key Numbers and Formulas to Remember

  • Group formation: 5extgroupsof4<br>ightarrow5imes4=20.5 ext{ groups of } 4 <br>ightarrow 5 imes 4 = 20.

  • Total course points: extTotalpoints=10=5+5.ext{Total points} = 10 = 5 + 5.

  • Presentation-related score: 5extpoints.5 ext{ points}.

  • Upload-related score: 5extpoints.5 ext{ points}.

  • Drafts submission format: save as Word, not PDF; file naming includes your name.

  • Two workshop questions per session: 2extquestionsperworkshop.2 ext{ questions per workshop}.

  • Due-date range mentioned: 3extto13ext(daysordatesasapplicable).3 ext{ to } 13 ext{ (days or dates as applicable)}.

  • Points with emphasis for a particular item: 0.5extmarks.0.5 ext{ marks}.

  • Week count for workshop focus: 8extweeks.8 ext{ weeks}.

Summary of Core Practices to Succeed in this Course

  • Regularly consult both Blackboard and the weekly syllabus for updated assignments, topics, and due dates.

  • Engage actively in the workshop: read peers' poems ahead of time, participate in discussions, and help facilitate group conversations when possible.

  • Prepare for presentations with a completed questionnaire, citation of at least one quotation from the chosen poem, and a clear, professional submission.

  • Submit weekly draft poems in Word format with proper naming conventions; avoid converting to PDF unless instructed.

  • Use the provided forms during workshops to capture insights (imagery, sound, etc.) and keep everything organized in drafts folders.

  • Use tools like voice memos and transcripts to capture ideas and refine them iteratively.

  • Seek instructor feedback proactively if anxiety or questions arise; accommodations can be discussed.

  • Embrace the diversity of the Digital Poetry Bookshelf as a resource for exposure to different poetic styles, voices, and cultures.

Next Steps

  • Review the Digital Canada Poetry in Canada Bookshelf and select a single poem that resonates with you.

  • Familiarize yourself with the presentation questionnaire and the required submission format.

  • Confirm your presentation slot via the sign-up system (remember: First Come, First Serve).

  • Prepare your draft poem and plan your workshop participation for the next session.

  • Keep a drafts folder and stay consistent with saving work across devices.