Two Perspectives on Proportional Relationships: Extending Complementary Origins of Multiplication in Terms of Quantities

Two Perspectives on Proportional Relationships

Authors and Publication Details

  • Authors: Sybilla Beckmann, Andrew Izsák

  • Institution: University of Georgia

  • Publication: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 17–38 (2015)

  • Key Words: Geometric similarity, Linear functions, Multiplication and division, Ratios / Proportions, Representation, Slope

  • Acknowledgments: Thanks to several scholars for helpful comments and to the Spencer Foundation and University of Georgia for support.

Introduction

  • Purpose: The article provides a mathematical analysis distinguishing two quantitative perspectives on ratios and proportional relationships:

    • Variable number of fixed quantities

    • Fixed numbers of variable parts

  • Background Context: This analysis parallels distinctions in measurement and partitive meanings for division and two meanings for multiplication:

    • Counting equal-sized groups (e.g., multiplier and multiplicand)

    • Scaling group sizes

  • Key Arguments:

    • The distinction in perspectives is independent of other existing literature distinctions on proportional relationships.

    • Psychological roots for multiplication suggest these perspectives are accessible to learners.

    • The overlooked perspective (fixed numbers of variable parts) may lay foundations for understanding more complex topics.

    • Directions for future empirical research are suggested.

Importance of Ratios and Proportional Relationships in Education

  • Educational Necessity: Ratios and proportional relationships underpin essential mathematical concepts such as:

    • Slope of a line

    • Similarity in geometry

    • Trigonometric ratios

    • Probability applications in physical and social sciences

  • Standards Reference:

    • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) emphasizes their critical foundation for algebra (e.g., NCTM, 1989, 2000; National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008).

Theoretical Framework

Understanding the Multiplicative Conceptual Field
  • Vergnaud’s Framework (1983, 1994): Ratios and proportional relationships fit within a broader multiplicative conceptual field comprising:

    • Whole-number multiplication and division

    • Fractions

    • Linear functions

  • Terminology and Analysis Issues:

    • Terminology for ratios and rates differs across studies; various definitions hinder consensus in research:

    • Ratios as comparisons between like or unlike quantities.

    • Ratios compared via operations involving fixed quantities (e.g., Thompson, 1994).

    • Distinctions between internal and external ratios complicate understanding (Lamon, 2007).

Two Complementary Perspectives on Ratios and Proportional Relationships
  1. Variable Number of Fixed Quantities (Previously referred to as composed unit reasoning)

    • Fixed units form batches with quantities following a fixed ratio.

    • Example: Amounts mixed in a ratio (A to B) form the basis for generalization using multiplication.

  2. Fixed Numbers of Variable Parts (Overlooked perspective)

    • Fixed numbers of parts can vary in size; each quantity corresponds to parts in a fixed ratio.

    • Example: Amounts can adjust according to the size of the variable parts but maintain the ratio.

Mathematical Analysis

Equations of Ratios and Proportional Relationships
  • General Equation for Problem Situations: MimesN=PM imes N = P

    • Interpretations:

    • In multiplication/division scenarios:

      • Multiplier, M = number of groups

      • Multiplicand, N = units in each group

      • Product, P = total units in M groups

    • In proportional contexts, the values x (unknowns) and y (covariates) can be modeled through this relationship.

Illustrating Multiplicative Relationships
  • Figure Interpretation: Equations represent the operational structure across different mathematical contexts, encapsulating both word problems and graphical representations.

    • Example: One cake mixes 4 cups of flour; 3 cakes equal 12 cups of flour, or partitioning can reveal ratios through structural divisions.

Distinctions in Division Perspectives
  • Types of Division:

    1. Partitive Division: Determining unknowns in groups (How many units in each group?)

    2. Measurement Division: Determining counts of groups (How many groups?)

  • Conjoins Different Classes of Division: Each perspective allows for different computational strategies which are crucial in educational contexts (e.g., Greer, 1992).

Reasoning from Different Perspectives

Comparison of Juice Mixing Problem
  • Example Problem: Mixing peach and grape juice in a 2 to 3 ratio approaches:

    1. Multiple-batches perspective (fixed volumes per batch)

    2. Variable-parts perspective (variations focus on part sizes)

  • Key Distinctions:

    • In situations like juice bottles where volume sizes are constant, the multiple-batches perspective applies seamlessly.

    • However, when focusing on mixing varying quantities in similar ratios, the variable-parts perspective clarifies the commensurate relationship between the components involved.

Strategies for Addressing Proportional Relationships
  • Building-Up Strategies: Promote combining quantities via iterative approaches across fixed measures.

  • Scaling Strategies: Promote adjusting portions to reflect necessary proportional changes, allowing for continued ratio maintenances.

  • Visual Representation: Diagramming methods (strip diagrams or double-number lines) to visualize ratios enhance understanding of numerical relationships involved.

Psychological Foundations for Each Perspective

Cognitive and Operational Perspectives
  • Research Context: Psychological norms suggest diverse frameworks through which students interpret multiplicative changes in quantities.

  • Conceptual Operations: Variability and repetition in grouping represent vital constructs for students in making connections with both perspectives, which affects problem-solving approaches.

  • Implications for Teaching: Understanding the duality in perspectives can offer educators insight into student learning pathways and facilitate course structuring, especially concerning ratios and algebra.

Implications for Instructional Design

  • Integration into Curricula: Incorporating both perspectives within teaching can provide a stronger mathematical foundation, particularly concerning advanced topics in algebra and geometry.

  • Highlighting areas prone to misunderstanding in the past offers opportunities to refine educational strategies.

Conclusion

  • Summary: The paper identifies two coherent perspectives on ratios and proportional relationships within a multiplicative framework, emphasizing existing deficiencies and potential improvements in educational research and methodologies. Further empirical efforts in addressing the variable-parts perspective could enrich students' comprehension of ratios, proportion, and their applications in mathematical problems.

References

  • Detailed citations documenting past research contributions, standards for mathematics education, and instructional practices were included throughout the transcript, underscoring the complexity of the subject matter as it relates to ongoing educational discourse and classroom applications.