2/25/26 notes

Literature Review Structure

  • Introduction
    • Introduces the topic of the literature review.
    • Clearly states the research question. Example phrasing: "Our research question is…"
    • Contains a brief overview of the content covered in the literature review.
    • Discusses the importance of the topic and its relevance to the field of counseling.
    • Provides reasoning for the relevance of the research question to counseling practices.

Research Question and Hypothesis

  • Research Question: Must be explicitly stated and clear.
  • Hypothesis:
    • Required for quantitative research.
    • Not needed for qualitative research.

Literature Review Organization and Sources

  • Should be well organized and well written.
  • Must utilize peer-reviewed literature, focusing on sources primarily within the last five years.
    • Older sources can be included but should not be the foundation.
    • The recommended number of primary sources: at least eight that are within the last six years.
  • Gap Analysis:
    • Discuss whether existing literature has addressed the area of research.
    • Identify significant gaps that warrant new research.

Theoretical Framework

  • Older Theories and Studies:
    • While older studies may be integral (e.g., long-standing theories), current data should dominate.
    • Elaborate on theoretical constructs relevant to the counseling field.

Literature Review Content

  • Should provide information about the variables and their significance.
    • Establishes the backbone supporting the research question.
    • Can persuade the reader regarding the importance of the research topic.

Feedback Mechanism

  • Drafts will be graded, with feedback provided to encourage growth in writing.
  • Peers will also provide feedback to enhance the refinement of proposals.

Required Writing Practices

  • Attention to APA format is paramount.
  • Reading Practices:
    • Read and reread drafts aloud to ensure clarity and accuracy.
    • Encourage peer collaboration for reviewing writing.

Group Work Reflection

  • For those working in pairs, a half-page reflection on how work was divided must be included in the final submission.

Overview of Correlation and Regression

  • Correlation Design:
    • Explores relationships between two or more variables without manipulation or intervention.
    • Useful for determining initial relationships prior to applying more in-depth statistical methods.
  • Regression Analysis:
    • Moves a step beyond correlation by predicting the outcome of a dependent variable based on one or more independent variables.
    • Two main types:
      • Simple Linear Regression: One independent variable predicting one dependent variable.
      • Multiple Regression: Several independent variables predicting one dependent variable.

Descriptive Statistics and Data Interpretation

  • Relationships defined using Pearson's r for correlation analysis and other statistical outputs for regressions.
  • Important outputs include correlation coefficient (
    • R-squared value evaluating the amount of variance explained by the predictors.

Understanding Statistical Significance

  • p-value significance in hypothesis testing.
    • Analyzing significance through set thresholds, typically 0.05 or lower.
    • Key for determining if variables are significantly related.

Practical Application of Key Terms and Concepts

  • Moderation vs. Mediation:
    • Moderation: Specifies how the strength and direction of the relationship are influenced by another variable.
    • Mediation: Explains how an independent variable affects a dependent variable via a third variable.

Statistical Tests and Their Usage

  • T-tests:
    • Independent samples t-test for evaluating differences between two mean samples.
    • Paired samples t-test for evaluating mean differences within the same sample at two different times.
  • ANOVA:
    • Analyzing differences between three or more groups.

Addressing Threats to Validity

  • Internal Validity: Refers to the extent to which causal conclusions can be drawn.
    • Common threats include maturation, history, instrumentation, selection bias, test effects, and mortality.
  • External Validity: Examines the generalizability of findings to broader contexts and populations.
    • Threats could stem from artificiality of testing conditions or variations in selection across groups.

Ethical Considerations in Research

  • Addressing participant consent and confidentiality.
  • Importance of maintaining integrity and ethical standards in quantitative and qualitative research designs.