Introduction to Media & Information Literacy: Communication Models, Social Media Impact, and Roles of Media
Learning Competencies
- Describe the extent to which media and information shape communication in the 21st-century context
- Identify similarities and differences among:
- Media Literacy
- Information Literacy
- Technology Literacy
- Think back over the last week
- List ALL interactions with information providers:
- Internet (web-sites, search engines, blogs)
- Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, Digg, etc.)
- Television
- Radio / Podcasts
- Print (newspapers, magazines, flyers, billboards)
- Guiding questions:
- Which medium consumed MOST of your time?
- What specific ROLES did each medium play in your daily life? (news, entertainment, school, social connection, etc.)
Understanding Communication
- Key prompting questions:
- What IS communication?
- HOW do we communicate?
- WHY do we communicate?
- Definition:
- Communication = the process of conveying or sharing information
- Historically viewed as an innate social skill
- 21st-century shift → “more social” due to technology & networked platforms
Transmission / Linear Models of Communication
- General idea: message flows in ONE direction, typically without immediate feedback
Lasswell’s Model (1948)
- Formula: Who → Says What → In Which Channel → To Whom → With What Effect?
- Elements
- Communicator (sender)
- Message
- Medium / Channel
- Receiver / Audience
- Effect (outcome, impact, change)
Shannon–Weaver Model (1949)
- Known as the “mother of all models” (devised for telephone & radio tech)
- Linear chain:
- Information Source (Sender)
- Transmitter (Encoder → converts to signal)
- Channel (pathway; vulnerable to Noise)
- Receiver (Decoder)
- Destination (Target audience)
- Criticisms
- Omits Feedback, so cannot ensure understanding
- Treats audience as passive
Publicity / Display Model
- Audience = spectators, primarily receivers of information displayed for attention rather than active participants
Reception & Cultural Models
Hall’s Encoding/Decoding Model (1993)
- Messages are encoded by producers and open to multiple interpretations by audiences
- Meaning depends on the receiver’s cultural, social, and ideological framework
- Emphasises active audience role
Osgood–Schramm Circular Model (1954)
- Adds Field of Experience: life experiences, attitudes, beliefs that shape encoding & decoding
- Depicts communication as interactive & continuous, not one-way
Berlo’s SMCR Model (1960)
- Components expanded:
- Sender (Source) – influenced by communication skills, attitudes, knowledge, social system, culture
- Message – content, elements, treatment, structure, code
- Channel – senses (hearing, seeing, touching, smelling, tasting) or technological medium
- Receiver – mirrors Sender variables, stressing similarity for successful transmission
Aristotle’s Rhetorical Model (pre-300 B.C.)
- First recorded communication model
- Speaker-centric & linear; success measured by persuasion of passive audience
- Central Elements:
- Speaker
- Speech (Message)
- Occasion (Context)
- Audience (Listener)
- Effect (Influence)
Core Elements & Processes in Communication (consolidated)
- Speaker / Sender / Communicator
- Message – information, ideas, feelings
- Medium – physical form of message (text, image, audio, video)
- Channel – means of transmission (airwaves, cables, Internet, print, face-to-face, etc.)
- Encoding – translating ideas into symbols, words, gestures
- Decoding – interpreting encoded symbols back into meaning
- Listener / Receiver – target of the message
- Feedback – receiver’s response that closes the loop
- Context – situational environment (physical, social, cultural, temporal)
- Barriers / Noise – any factor that disrupts or distorts the message (physical noise, psychological bias, semantic ambiguity, technological failure)
- Information flow has become faster, broader, more participatory
- Social Media Effect (infographic summary):
- Content creation → submitted to Digg → reaches front page → cascades to Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, StumbleUpon, major blogs → amplified via retweets/shares → large inbound links → high Google search ranking
- Visitor statistics (examples from infographic)
- Digg front page ≈ 4.8 M unique visitors
- Reddit ≈ 22.4 M unique visitors
- Facebook status exposure ≈ 128 M unique visitors
- StumbleUpon ≈ 3.9 M unique visitors
- Chain reaction demonstrates how a single post can become viral, reinforcing media’s amplifying power
- Recognises centrality of information and media in everyday life
- Core to freedom of expression & informed citizenship
- Empowers users to:
- Understand functions of media & information providers
- Critically evaluate content
- Create & share informed, responsible messages
- Integrates media literacy, information literacy, and technology literacy into a holistic competence
- Channels of information & knowledge enabling citizens to make informed decisions
- Platforms for informed debate among diverse actors
- Primary source of learning about the broader world
- Mirror through which society examines itself & builds community
- Watchdog over government & power (transparency & accountability)
- Facilitator of democratic processes & fair elections
- Vehicle for cultural expression & cohesion (within & across nations)
- Advocate / social actor in its own right, while respecting pluralism
Connections to Broader Principles
- Feedback loops distinguish interactive models from early linear models
- Technological convergence blurs boundaries between sender & receiver (prosumer culture)
- Ethical implication: with great reach comes responsibility for accuracy, fairness, cultural sensitivity (e.g., controversies over racist magazine covers, offensive T-shirts noted in references)
- Practical implication: mastery of MIL skills crucial for academic research, professional effectiveness, and civic engagement in information-saturated environments
- Visitor statistics given above act as quantitative illustration of viral reach
- No traditional mathematical formulas presented in transcript; however, causal chain of reach can be conceptually modelled as exponential growth R=k×an where:
- R = total reach
- k = initial audience size
- a = average number of shares per user
- n = levels of sharing
Referenced Resources (for further study & credibility)
- Liquigan, B.C. “Media and Information Literacy” (Diwa)
- Project LookSharp (Ithaca College media literacy project)
- McGraw-Hill Higher Ed communication PDF
- University of Washington Northwest Center curriculum documents
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (logical fallacies)
- ChurchMag: Logic fallacy resources
- SkillsYouNeed.com – Critical Thinking
- GMA Network news links (case studies on public outrage & media ethics)
Ethical, Philosophical, & Real-World Implications
- Media as watchdog vs. media as potential source of misinformation
- Need for critical thinking to spot logical fallacies in online content
- Cultural sensitivity to avoid reinforcing stereotypes (e.g., “racist cover” recall)
- Responsibility of content creators & platforms to balance freedom of expression with social accountability
Quick Comparative Overview: Literacies
- Media Literacy: ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and create media
- Information Literacy: ability to recognize information need, locate, evaluate, and use effectively
- Technology Literacy: ability to use digital tools and platforms efficiently & responsibly
- Overlaps: critical evaluation, ethical use, communicative competence
- Distinctions: focus of content (media messages vs. information resources vs. tools)
Study Tips
- Map each communication model chronologically to visualize evolution
- Practice identifying model elements in real interactions (e.g., texting = encoder? channel?)
- Keep a weekly media diary to heighten awareness of consumption patterns
- Apply MIL lens when reading news: check source credibility, bias, factual accuracy