4.5 - Oligopoly & Game Theory
Only a few firms
large market shares
Control over price
mutual interdependence - based on what other’s in the market are doing
strategic behavior
price war
Entry barriers
economies of scale
Control of Resources
Collusive Oligopoly
If a few firms face similar demand and costs they will act like a monopoly
teaming up and both rise prices a lot and cut back on output
Monopoly graph
Split monopoly profits
Overt (in the open) Collusion
Cartel
OPEC
Covert (hidden) Collusion
Illegal in the U.S.
Tacit Understandings - “Gentlemen’s Agreements”
No contracts involved
Obstacles to Collusion
Demand or Cost Differences (having more demand or efficiency than another firm so it would not be to one’s benefit to collude)
Number of firms (more firms makes collusion more difficult)
Cheating
Potential Entry
Antitrust Law
Not Productively Efficient
P does not = Minimum ATC
Not Allocatively Efficient
P does not = MC
Game Theory:
Payoff Matrix
2 strategies - high price or low price
high | low | |
high | A - $12/$12 | B - $15/$6 |
low | C - $6/$15 | D - $8/$8 |
Greatest combined profit
Independent actions stimulate response (where one cheats)
Dominant strategies - better off going low
Both gravitate towards the worst case - D
Nash equilibrium - worse case (D) - what they will do
no dominant strategy for both - no nash equilibrium
Collusive outcome (both are guaranteed/trust that the other business will raise the price) - best case (A)