Detailed Study Notes on Popular Dance and its Cultural Significance
Positioning Popular Dance
Introduction to Popular Dance Studies
- The focus on popular dance gained momentum in 2001 with the Dance Research Journal dedicated to 'social and popular dance'.
- This shift indicates a growing relativist approach in dance studies, questioning traditional boundaries of dance forms.
- Editor Julie Malnig (2001) discusses the diversity within popular dance encompassing various forms, skills, professionalism, and performance contexts.
- Malnig points out the fluidity and interchange among terms social, vernacular, and popular dances without defining their distinct characteristics.
- Storey (2003) contends that definitions of popular culture are constructed and reconceptualized, highlighting their social relevance.
Questioning 'What is Popular Dance?'
- Emphasis on the term 'popular' brings forth an examination of dance practices outside elite cultural forms.
- Historians challenge the strict divide between elite and popular culture in early modern England (1500-1800), suggesting a fragmented and fluid popular culture.
- The discussion expands to include cultural exchanges between elite and popular forms, as noted by Reay (1998), emphasizing shared cultural activities.
Historical Context of Popular Dance
Industrialization and Urbanization
- Cultural studies scholars identify the period from the mid-19th to early 20th century as pivotal for developing contemporary popular culture due to vast social changes.
- This era saw significant transformations in life across Europe and America, prompting debates about classification of 'popular dance'.
Dance Studies and Related Disciplines
- The initial analysis of popular dance definitions is rooted in dance studies, extending to include insights from popular music and cultural studies.
- Popular music studies arose as a reaction against the emphasis on 'art music' and a challenge to the long-held definitions of musical culture.
- Challenges in defining 'popular music' due to its diverse styles make establishing clear classifications difficult; this is echoed in the ambiguity surrounding popular culture.
Conceptualizing Popular Dance
Defining the 'Popular'
- The term 'popular' is described as a slippery classification, used to denote specific cultural products and practices, yet difficult to unify within distinct definitions.
- Various intellectual frameworks offer different paradigms to explore the 'popular', relating it to folk and art cultures, mass culture theories, and power dynamics.
Interdisciplinary Methodology
- The chapter employs interdisciplinary methods to understand popular dance, drawing examples from tap dance, pogo, and ragtime to demonstrate historical shifts and definitions.
- Participants in popular dance are often involved in a negotiation of meanings and practices that resist simple categorization.
Selection of Terms
- The use of 'popular' is justified as more inclusive than 'social' or 'vernacular', recognizing that it accounts for both participatory and representational cultural practices.
- Scholars like Buckland make distinctions between popular, classical, and folk dance, resulting in marginalization of popular dance in academic discussions.
Classifying Cultural Practices
Historical Context of Folk, Art, and Popular Culture
- Storey (2003) discusses how industrialization initiated a split between high (art) and low (popular) culture, marking a significant change in British cultural life.
- The construction and reinforcement of cultural categories reflect societal values and power relations.
Buckland's Paradox
- Buckland describes a triadic relationship where popular dance sits undefined between classical and folk dance, reflecting a tension in institutionalized culture frameworks.
- The characteristics of classical versus folk drive the understanding of popular dance, often relegated to definitions of what it is not.
Mass Culture and Manipulation
Emergence of Mass Culture
- Early 20th-century industrialization led to the rise of mass culture; theorists like Arnold warned that it could undermine moral values and social stability.
- Definitions of popular culture began to align with emerging mass media forms and their repetitive, formulaic characteristics, raising concerns over their effect on authenticity and individuality.
The Culture Industry Debate
- The Frankfurt School theorizes that mass culture creates passive consumers, homogenizing cultural experiences and disempowering individual agency.
- Counterarguments suggest the importance of recognizing active consumer engagement and resistance within popular culture, allowing for unpredictable, emergent practices to flourish.
The Tension between Industry and Popular Practice
Dance as a Site of Contestation
- Popular dance exists as a negotiation between cultural producers (the industry) and participants (the people), with both forces influencing the evolution and definition of dance practices.
- Historical examples, such as ragtime and punk, highlight the dynamics of social regulation, resistance, and cultural value in popular dance.
Ragtime and its Cultural Significance
- Ragtime, emerging from African American culture, illustrated tensions between commercial exploitation and cultural ownership, particularly in a racially charged context.
- The dance genre served as a reflection of social conditions and changed perceptions of womanhood and youth in the Progressive Era.
Towards a Working Definition of Popular Dance
Conceptual Framework
- A working definition of popular dance must consider historical, economic, and social dimensions, recognizing reflections of shared community values, creativity, and the surrounding contexts.
- The fluidity of definitions suggests no singular characterization of popular dance but highlights conditions fostering its evolution.
Interconnectedness of Local and Global Practices
- Globalization and mass communication have transformed local dance practices, suggesting an interplay between local traditions and international influences.
- Efforts must be made to acknowledge the global nature of popular dance beyond Western-centric approaches, recognizing diverse cultural expressions worldwide.
Conclusion
- Popular dance encompasses varied forms of movement that reflect a spectrum of social, economic, and cultural influences; its definition remains dynamic rather than static.