Film Analysis Notes

The Female Gaze in Pelin Esmer’s Something Useful (2017)

  • Film Overview:

    • Original Title: İşe Yarar Bir Şey

    • Director: Pelin Esmer

    • Year: 2017

    • Main Characters:

      • Leyla: A middle-aged lawyer-poet, emotionally distant but intellectually sharp.

      • Canan: A young, timid nursing student with dreams of acting, carrying the emotional burden of an assisted euthanasia request.

  • Director Background: Pelin Esmer

    • Born in Istanbul in 1972.

    • Studied sociology at Boğaziçi University, informing her films with insights into social systems, gender roles, and emotional dynamics.

    • Early career in documentaries, known for capturing intimate moments and personal stories.

    • Common themes: female solitude, moral complexity, memory, artistic expression, bodily presence.

  • What Is the Female Gaze?

    • A feminist response to the “male gaze” (Laura Mulvey, 1975), which sexualizes and objectifies women on screen.

    • The female gaze centers:

      • Women as complete, feeling subjects.

      • Sensory detail and emotional presence.

      • Interpersonal care and ethical intimacy.

      • Reciprocal looking: women looking at each other with empathy, not control.

How the Female Gaze Operates in Something Useful

  • Mutual Female Intimacy Without Voyeurism

    • The relationship between Leyla and Canan develops gradually through conversation, glances, and shared silence.

    • Extended takes of them on the train without cuts or angles that eroticize their bodies.

    • They observe each other as subjects, not objects.

  • Emotion as a Narrative Force

    • Emotions are not performed but simmer and build internally.

    • The pacing reflects the unfolding of emotional labor and ethical decisions through pauses, unspoken words, and inner struggle.

  • Poetic Voice = Female Subjectivity

    • Leyla’s poetry (spoken and written) provides insight into her inner life.

    • Female authorship becomes visible, literary, and reflective, offering a feminist articulation of voice.

  • Assisted Death as Female Ethical Agency

    • Canan’s involvement in euthanasia is not portrayed as inherently negative or tragic.

    • It’s depicted as a complex, deeply personal decision—a moral act driven by a young woman and not judged by patriarchal norms.

  • Visual Stillness Mirrors Inner World

    • Static camera, natural lighting, and real-time dialogue underscore the quiet significance of daily female existence.

    • The film's pace slows the viewer down, encouraging reflection rather than mere consumption.

  • Key Scene: Train conversation at night, dimly lit with shadows, emphasizing eyes, breathing, and emotional withdrawal over physical exposure.

Feminist Film Theories in Action

  • Laura Mulvey: The film subverts the active male/passive female dichotomy.

  • bell hooks: The gaze is returned, allowing women to see and listen to each other, dismantling power hierarchies in looking.

  • Teresa de Lauretis: Women in the film are not symbolic but serve as narrators of their own ambiguities and conflicts.

Conclusion

The female gaze in Something Useful is a cinematic ethic centered on seeing women as subjects with emotional power, moral depth, and quiet strength rather than visual surfaces. Esmer creates a space where women think, care, act, and observe without objectification.

Classifications of Chantal Akerman’s Cinema

  • About Chantal Akerman

    • Born in 1950 in Brussels, Belgium.

    • Jewish; her mother was a survivor of Auschwitz, which deeply influenced Akerman's work.

    • Lesbian, fiercely independent, and emotionally raw.

    • Committed suicide in 2015, shortly after completing No Home Movie about her mother's death.

    • Her films are personal, minimalist, and emotionally rigorous.

Classification 1: Women’s Cinema/Feminist Cinema

  • Example: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975)

    • A 3.5-hour film depicting a single mother’s domestic routine: cooking, cleaning, and prostitution.

    • Features no soundtrack, long static takes, and real-time pacing.

    • Radical because:

      • Everyday domesticity becomes monumental.

      • The film exposes how patriarchy reduces women to rituals and how those rituals can implode.

  • Why It Fits:

    • Centers female time and labor.

    • Dismantles the idea of women as sexualized figures.

    • Uses form (repetition, stasis) as feminist expression.

Classification 2: National Cinema (Belgian/European)

  • Born in Belgium, many early films are Belgian/French productions.

  • However, Akerman resisted being defined as “Belgian,” as her work critiques bourgeois European values.

  • Example: Golden Eighties (1986)

    • A musical set in a Brussels shopping mall, using pop culture to satirize post-war optimism and female containment.

Classification 3: Transnational/Diasporic Cinema

  • Akerman moved between Belgium, New York, Paris, and Eastern Europe.

  • Films are filled with travel, alienation, and displacement.

  • Jewish identity is central, though often implicit.

  • Examples:

    • News from Home (1977): Akerman reads letters from her mother while showing images of NYC.

    • From the East (1993): A documentary on post-Soviet migration.

    • No Home Movie (2015): Her last film, focused on her mother in her final days—personal and post-traumatic.

Classification 4: Auteur Cinema

  • Her work is instantly recognizable:

    • Minimal dialogue

    • Long static shots

    • Emphasis on silence, routine, architecture

  • Her signature themes:

    • Jewish identity

    • Mother-daughter relationships

    • Queerness and female solitude

    • Alienation in the modern world

Feminist and Film Theory Anchors

  • Laura Mulvey: Akerman opposes voyeuristic film language.

  • Judith Butler: Queer temporality and performative identity.

  • Toby Miller: Transnational cinema that defies state borders and fixed identities.

Conclusion

Akerman’s cinema is feminist, transnational, diasporic, and deeply personal. Her refusal to conform—to form, genre, or identity—makes her a filmmaker whose work exists in-between borders, bodies, and histories.

How Margarethe von Trotta’s Marianne and Juliane Promotes Female Subjectivity

  • Film Overview

    • Original Title: Die bleierne Zeit (The Leaden Time)

    • Year: 1981

    • Based on the real-life Ensslin sisters: Gudrun (terrorist) and Christiane (journalist).

    • Fictionalized as Marianne (radical leftist, joins RAF) and Juliane (feminist journalist).

    • After Marianne’s death in prison (possible state violence), Juliane reconstructs her sister’s truth through memory.

  • About Margarethe von Trotta

    • Born in 1942 in Berlin during WWII.

    • Key figure in New German Cinema.

    • One of the first German women directors to gain critical and commercial success.

    • Recurring themes: female memory, sisterhood, politics, historical trauma, and resistance.

    • Former actress, deeply attuned to emotional performance and psychological realism.

How the Film Promotes Female Subjectivity

  • Narrative Through Juliane’s POV

    • The story is told from Juliane’s emotional perspective.

    • The audience experiences her confusion, guilt, loyalty, and fear.

  • Use of Flashbacks = Memory as Form

    • Non-linear time mimics how trauma works—not logically but emotionally.

    • Marianne appears as an echo, a haunting presence woven into Juliane’s present.

  • Sisterhood > Romance

    • Male characters are marginal.

    • Primary emotional relationships are between women, through conflict, love, and mourning.

    • Female bonds become the foundation for political and personal truth.

  • Grief as a Political Act

    • Juliane refuses to forget or sanitize her sister’s memory.

    • She reclaims female rage, grief, and political history in a public space dominated by men.

  • Archives of the Body

    • Marianne’s body (post-death) becomes contested, with questions of suicide versus murder.

    • Juliane fights for the truth of her sister’s body and life, a metaphor for reclaiming female narratives.

Feminist Film Theory Links

  • Teresa de Lauretis: The female subject as one who remakes memory and identity.

  • bell hooks: Grieving woman as political agent, not a silent victim.

  • Claire Johnston: Counter-cinema that disrupts linear, patriarchal storytelling.

Conclusion

Marianne and Juliane promote female subjectivity by placing female grief, memory, and history at the center. Juliane is not a witness to history but a maker of counter-history, retelling the lives of women through emotion, memory, and resistance.