Crime Trends
National Crime Victimization Survey
Data Collection
45,000 households surveyed over 3 years
Use of Random Sampling
Respondents asked if they have been victims of particular crimes
Definitions of Crimes: Provides clear definitions and context for reporting
Alternative Estimates: Yields a higher number of reported crimes compared to official statistics
National Crime Victimization Survey Problems
Filters for Survey: May exclude certain demographics
Victim Reluctance to Report Crimes: Many victims may not disclose incidents
Memory Problems: Recall issues can lead to underreporting or misreporting
Interviewer Effects: The presence and approach of interviewers may influence responses
Legal Judgments: Victims may alter responses based on legal implications
Self-Report Data
National Youth Survey: A survey targeting juveniles regarding delinquent acts
Key Components Explored:
Context of delinquent acts (families, friends, school)
Motivation for committing crimes
Confidentiality: Aims to improve accuracy of responses
Findings: Crime is widespread across race and class in the US
Self-Report Data Problems
Filters: Potential exclusion of certain cohorts
Non-reporting by Respondents: Some may hesitate to disclose real data
Memory Problems: Similar to victimization surveys, recall may affect reporting
Under-representation: Repeat and persistent offenders often not captured
Boasting: Some respondents may exaggerate criminal behavior
Comparing Data Sources
Different Data Collection Methods: Various methodologies yield unique insights
Overlap and Differences in Crimes: Some crimes may be reported across multiple sources
Differing Crime Rates: Each source may reveal different profiles of crime
Trends Over Time: Data is roughly comparable across historical periods
Quantitative Data: All findings are influenced by social processes
Fieldwork / Ethnographies
Focus Areas:
Victims
Criminals
Covert Participant Observation
Other Sources of Data: Important for understanding crime in context
Crime Trends
Annual Murder Rate in the U.S.: 10 murders per 100,000 people
Historical Data: 2021 (6.8), 2023 Estimate (5.3), 1960, 1980, 2000, 2020 trends analyzed
Factors That DON’T Explain The Decline in Crime
Strong Economy of the 1990’s: Not directly linked to crime rate decrease
Changing Demographics: Fail to account for crime drop
Policing Techniques: Limited relevance
Increased Use of Capital Punishment: No clear causal connection
Levitt’s Explanations for Decrease in Crime
Increased Number of Police: More law enforcement presence
Rising Prison Population: Higher incarceration rates correlate with lower crime
Receding Crack Epidemic: Reduction in drug-related crime
Legalization of Abortion: Societal impacts leading to lower crime rates
Correlates of Crime
Ice Cream Sales: Surprising correlation indicating seasonality in crime rates
Ecology and Weather: Influences on criminal behavior
Urban Areas: Crime density related to urbanization
The South: Notable Southern subculture of violence
Age: Correlation with crime onset and desistance
Correlates of Crime - Socioeconomic Status
Common Finding: Lower-class individuals engage in more criminal conduct than higher classes
Measurement:
Crime?
Official Crime Statistics?
Survey Data?
Socioeconomic Status Interactions with Other Variables
Racial Dynamics: Relationship between socioeconomic status and delinquency holds across racial lines
Gender: Crime rates also show variation between men and women
Immigration: Notably lower crime in immigrant communities.