Justice and Injustice in the Criminal Justice System
Introduction
Lecture focuses on justice and injustice within the criminal justice system.
Will include case studies to understand how injustices occur.
In New Zealand, like other Western democracies, there are safeguards to protect against wrongful convictions.
Safeguards Against Injustice
Innocent until proven guilty: individuals are treated as innocent until formally convicted.
High burden of proof: criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Civil court standard: civil cases have a lower standard of proof (balance of probabilities) due to lower stakes.
Life Sentence: Individuals may be released on parole, but the sentence remains for life, with ongoing conditions and potential recall to prison.
Exception: only one person in New Zealand, the mosque terrorist, will never be released.
Blackstone's Ratio
It is better that 10 guilty persons escape than one innocent person suffers.
Principle: Western societies prioritize avoiding wrongful convictions, originating from the Enlightenment.
Flaws in the Justice System
Despite safeguards, injustices occur.
US Exonerations: Approximately 2,000 people exonerated since 1989, having served an average of 8.8 years.
Prisons are harsh environments, making wrongful imprisonment a significant injustice.
Death Penalty: 4.1% of death row inmates have been proven innocent, arguing against capital punishment.
Death penalty's deterrence: States with and without the death penalty show similar murder rates.
Murders: often spur-of-the-moment acts, not deterred by the death penalty. Certainty of being caught is a deterrent.
Famous Cases: Guildford Four (In the Name of the Father) and Reuben Carter (The Hurricane).
Wrongful Convictions in New Zealand
Sir Thomas Thorpe: Claimed that about 20 people might be innocent in New Zealand prisons.
Case Studies
Crew Murders (1970)
Double homicide: Jeanette and Harvey Crew were murdered, but bodies were initially missing.
Prime suspect: Initially Jeanette's father, later Arthur Allen Thomas, a farmer.
Police: Focused on Arthur Allen Thomas, but many felt uneasy about the case.
Evidence: Shell casing was allegedly planted by police officers Bruce Dutton and Leonard Johnston.
Outcome: Arthur Allen Thomas was freed and compensated, but controversy remains.
David Dougherty (Early 1990s)
Young child sexually assaulted: The child identified David Dougherty, the next-door neighbor.
Evidence: DNA evidence later proved David Dougherty's innocence.
Commentary: David Dougherty was 100% innocent.
Tina Poore
Tina Poore: A 17-year-old with diminished capacity, tried to falsely claim reward money.
Wrongful Conviction: Convicted of murder despite clear evidence he knew nothing about the case.
Release: Freed after 20 years due to work by Tim McKinnell and journalists.
Justice Minister's comment: triggered criticism that justice should not take 20 years.
Peter Ellis (1993)
Peter Ellis: he worked in a childcare center, a creche, and was accused of child abuse.
Allegations: Numerous, bizarre allegations emerged (forcing children to dance naked, placing them in cages or ovens).
Satanic abuse: Concerns from The US influenced the social climate in New Zealand.
Conviction: The theory that children don't lie contributed to the conviction.
Ministerial Prejudice: A government minister stated that homosexuality implied a predilection to pedophilia.
Exoneration: Exonerated in 2022, three years after his death, following a Supreme Court appeal.
David Bain
David Bain: Was found guilty. The speaker seems to think that David Bain is guilty, but there are several arguments that proof otherwise.
Evidence: Police failed to swab hands for gunshot residue.
Factors Contributing to Miscarriages of Justice
False or Incorrect Testimony
Eyewitness Testimony: Unreliable, as proven by experiments.
Memory Creation: Police suggestions can influence memories.
False Confessions
Surprisingly Common: 20-25% of overturned cases involved false confessions.
Reasons: can be for bargaining reasons.
Plea Bargaining
Charge Stacking: Overcharging to force guilty pleas.
System Delays: Remand conditions make pleading guilty appealing.
Contaminated Evidence and Expert Testimony
Expert Witness Influence: Juries give undue weight to expert testimony.
Police Expertise: Can be misused if deficiencies are not acknowledged.
Poor Legal Representation
Money needed: Good lawyers are expensive.
Withheld or Falsified Evidence
Motivations: Often framed as doing the right thing.
Investigator Bias
Intentions: Often with good intentions, sometimes unconscious bias.
Reid Technique: Interrogation technique used to pressure suspects, now banned in most jurisdictions.
Does the System Work?
Overall: Yes, it is very good but not infallible.
Acknowledgment: Police and prosecutors should acknowledge potential errors.
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Importance: Provides a white knight for everyone.
Location: Hamilton, to insulate from external noise.
Challenge: Requires significant resources to investigate cases.