M7 Contributory Negligence Part I
Overview of the Defense of Contributory Negligence
The defense of contributory negligence shifts the legal focus from the defendant's actions to the conduct of the plaintiff.
The plaintiff is defined as the person who was injured in the accident.
This defense is used to mitigate or bar the plaintiff's recovery based on their own role in causing the harm they suffered.
Requirements for Proving Contributory Negligence
To successfully establish a defense of contributory negligence, two primary elements must be demonstrated:
1. Negligent Conduct of the Plaintiff:
The plaintiff must have acted in a way that is legally classified as negligent.
This necessitates showing that the plaintiff had a specific duty to act reasonably under the circumstances.
It must be proven that the plaintiff breached this duty by failing to act as a reasonable person would have.
2. Causation of Harm:
The plaintiff's negligence must be a direct contributor to the resulting injury.
Actual Cause: The plaintiff's negligence must be the actual cause of the harm.
Proximate Cause: The plaintiff's negligence must also be the proximate cause of the harm that occurred.
The Analytical Framework: Mirroring Negligence
The analysis used for determining contributory negligence directly mirrors the structure of a standard negligence analysis.
Methodological Consistency: The process for evaluating whether a plaintiff's conduct was reasonable is identical to the process for evaluating a defendant's conduct.
The Reasonable Person Standard: In both scenarios, the court applies the objective standard: "What would a reasonable person have done under the circumstances?"
Distinct Differences Between Defendant and Plaintiff Negligence
While the analytical method is the same, there is a fundamental distinction regarding the target of the duty of care:
Defendant's Negligence: This involves a failure to exercise due care to protect other people from harm.
Plaintiff's Contributory Negligence: This involves a failure to exercise due care to protect oneself from harm.
Foundational Legal Precedent
The first reported case to recognize and formally establish the defense of contributory negligence is Butterfield v. Forrester.
Students should review Butterfield v. Forrester to gain a deeper understanding of the origins and application of this legal doctrine.