Full PDF slate

Legal Construction of Race

  • Definition of Race

    • Decades of faulty research and ideologies have misled the conclusion that human beings possess a distinct "race."

    • Incorrect Conceptualization of Race:

    • Race is perceived as having significant biological differences that categorize individuals as distinct—either superior or inferior—due to behavioral traits or intelligence.

    • Race is considered an immutable characteristic ascribed at birth.

    • Definitions suggest that race embodies a biological trait.

  • Controversy in Social Science

    • Some social scientists reject the notion of race as a social construct but perpetuate the existence of race through institutional practices.

    • Flawed Approaches:

    • There are serious methodological and conceptual flaws in the way social scientists have approached the study of race.

  • Miscommunication Regarding Race

    • Misleading Language:

    • Discussion around race often leads to rigid classifications of people as "white," "brown," and "Black."

    • It is critical to differentiate whether people are inherently categorized as such or whether they have been socially constructed into these identities.

  • And the Social Implications

    • Acknowledgment of Race as a Social Construct:

    • Yes, race is a social construct; however, this recognition does not negate its significant implications within society.

The Construction of Racial Identity

  • Who Constructs Race?

    • Law is a significant player in the construction of racial identities, influencing the way race is understood and enacted in society.

  • Legal Cases Impacting Racial Construction

    • Ozawa vs. United States

    • United States vs. Thind

    • Dow vs. United States

  • Nested Contexts of Race

    • The construction of race through law is situated within broader socio-political contexts, particularly:

    • Capitalism

    • Colonialism

Legal Frameworks and Definitions

  • Legal Definition of Race

    • The law does not merely codify existing racial categories by providing legal definitions. Instead:

    • Courts, legislatures, and the law create and define racial identities in contemporary society.

    • Legal systems delineate the privileges or disadvantages associated with these racial identities.

  • Mechanisms of Racial Division

    • Courts rationalize racial divisions through:

    • Common Knowledge

    • Scientific Evidence

  • Overall Conceptualization

    • Race is socially constructed by law, influenced by the socio-political backdrop of society.

Conclusion

  • The legal construction of race is deeply rooted in societal contexts and historical processes, emphasizing that understanding race involves recognizing its complex legal and social dimensions.

RACE, LAW AND POLICING


HISTORY OF POLICE/POLICING

Emergence of Night Watch

  • Definition: The night watch refers to an early form of policing, where individuals, known as Watchmen, were tasked with maintaining order during nighttime hours.

    • Boston: The city established its night watch in 1636.

    • New York: Initiated night watch in 1658.

    • Philadelphia: Implemented night watch by 1700.

  • Characteristics:

    • Theoretically a volunteer service, largely comprised of individuals evading military service.

Development of Centralized Police Departments

  • 1830s: Marked the first emergence of centralized municipal police departments in the United States, reflecting a shift from decentralized to organized policing efforts.

Policing in Southern States

  • Origin: Policing developed from "Slave Patrols" in the Carolina colonies, established in 1704.

  • Functionalities of Slave Patrols:

    • Capture and Return: Chase down, apprehend, and return escaped slaves to their owners.

    • Terror Tactics: Employ organized terror to deter slave revolts and maintain discipline among enslaved workers.

    • Transition to Municipal Departments: These vigilante-style organizations later evolved into formal municipal police departments.

PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Foundation of American Police

  • American police forces grew not primarily in response to rising crime but rather as a reaction to societal disorder.

POST CIVIL-WAR POLICING

Transition in Focus

  • Municipal police departments increasingly focused on "strike-breaking" activities in the late 19th century.

    • Notes the prevalence of union organizing and labor unrest during this period.

  • Transition of Responsibilities:

    • Private Sector Influence: The private sector began to offload the responsibility of protecting its economic interests onto public employees.

    • This approach was deemed legally necessary and cost-effective for manufacturers.

    • Politically advantageous, as it conflated worker rights with crime.

PRODUCT OVERVIEW CONTINUED

Economic Roots of Policing

  • The roots of American policing are fundamentally tied to the demands of the nation’s political economy rather than solely addressing crime issues.

HOW COPS & COURTS CRUSH LABOR PROTESTS

POLICE TODAY

Activities of Police

  • Current police activities largely revolve around responses to:

    • Noise complaints.

    • Issuing parking and traffic citations.

    • Addressing non-criminal issues.

  • Findings from a New York Times Review of 10 major city police departments:

    • Serious violent crimes constitute only around 1% of all calls for service.

    • Among the 10.6 million yearly arrests made, only 5% are for violent offenses, highlighting a concerning disparity in arrests for non-violent and low-level offenses that disproportionately affect Black and Brown communities.

Reporting of Crimes

  • Approximately 40% of crime victims report their experiences to the police.

  • Of those crimes reported, only about 25% are "cleared by arrests."

    • Clearance rates indicate the percentage of reported crimes that result in an arrest.

    • Murder Cases: About 60% of murder cases are cleared, but this rate drops to 45% for gun-involved homicides.

Sexual Violence Reporting

  • Less than 25% of sexual violence cases are reported to the police.

    • Among those who do not report, 13% express fear that the police would be unable or unwilling to assist.

Police Conduct

  • Concerning statistics regarding police conduct:

    • It is estimated that around 40% of police officers have experienced intimate partner violence in their households, compared to just 10% of the general public, raising serious questions about domestic violence among police officers and their communities.

Where Did Policing Originate?

Exploration into the historical roots and foundational aspects of policing as a social institution indicates diverse origins, evolving from informal social control mechanisms in ancient societies to more structured systems. Ancient civilizations often relied on kin-policing or military forces. Later, medieval England saw the development of the 'frankpledge system' (where groups of 1010 families were collectively responsible for maintaining order) and then the 'watch and ward' systems (where citizens took turns patrolling at night and guarding during the day). Modern organized policing largely emerged in the 1818th and 1919th centuries, epitomized by Robert Peel's reforms in London (18291829) with the establishment of the Metropolitan Police Force, emphasizing crime prevention and public service through uniformed officers.

What Do Police Do?

Police perform various roles that extend significantly beyond crime fighting, encompassing a broad spectrum of criminal and non-criminal functions. These roles include maintaining public order, providing assistance in emergencies (such as medical crises or natural disasters), responding to public disturbances, and serving as a visible presence to deter crime proactively, in addition to their traditional investigative and law enforcement duties like making arrests and issuing citations.

Legal/Policy Scholarship on Policing
  • Critique of Current Focus:

    • Research traditionally narrows on concepts such as "crime-control" or "criminality," often overlooking the broader societal impact of policing and its non-criminal dimensions. This focus frequently centers on the direct outcomes of law enforcement activities, such as arrest rates, crime statistics, or punitive measures.

    • Examination of techniques of crime control often emphasizes issues like "police bias," particularly in the context of racial profiling, disproportionate enforcement against minority groups, and the use of force, frequently analyzed through a criminal justice lens.

  • Overlooked Aspects:

    • The need to address non-criminal functions of policing is highlighted, recognizing that police spend a significant portion of their time on activities not directly related to investigating or solving crimes. These often involve social work, dispute resolution, crisis intervention, and various forms of public assistance.

    • Argument that police reform efforts must be considered alongside other central strategies of American racial inequality, suggesting that police practices are deeply intertwined with and actively perpetuate systemic issues like residential segregation, economic disparities, and social marginalization.

Research on Legal/Policy Policing
  • Common Understanding of Police:

    • The prevalent view of police as primary crime fighters, heavily reinforced by media portrayals, popular culture, and legislative priorities, can overshadow their profound and often subtle role in shaping everyday residential life, enforcing social norms, and influencing community dynamics beyond crime prevention.

  • Social Roles of Police:

    • Police fulfill multiple roles:

      • Offering protection to citizens, not just from criminal acts but also in emergency situations (e.g., accidents, medical crises, natural disasters).

      • Enforcing laws to maintain civic order, which includes managing protests, controlling traffic, addressing quality-of-life offenses, and ensuring compliance with local ordinances.

      • Providing various public services, acting as first responders for mental health crises, homelessness, truancy, and other social welfare issues that may not involve criminal activity.

  • Policy Discussions:

    • Tend to emphasize crime control strategies, focusing intently on issues like "police bias" in criminal contexts (e.g., stop-and-frisk practices, use of force, arrests), yet often fail to adequately address the biases embedded in their non-criminal functions that contribute to racial and economic stratification, such as how they interact with marginalized communities during non-emergency calls.

History of Policing
  • Historical Examples:

    • Enforcement activities have historically included:

      • Strike-breaking activities to control organized labor movements and protect industrial interests, often violently suppressing workers' rights to assemble, protest, and unionize.

      • Slave patrols in maintaining societal hierarchies, particularly in the antebellum South, where their primary function was to control enslaved populations, enforce racial codes, and prevent rebellions, demonstrating a clear link between policing and racial oppression desde su inicio.

      • Modern discussion incorporates non-criminal functions of policing, particularly in structuring residential life, recognizing that police actions contribute to the social and economic fabric of neighborhoods, often reinforcing existing inequalities and boundaries.

Racial Segregation and Policing
  • Contribution to Segregation:

    • Examination of how policing practices, through both explicit and implicit actions, contribute to the perpetuation and reinforcement of residential racial segregation. This includes targeted enforcement in certain neighborhoods, differential response times, and the creation of perceived neighborhood boundaries that deter cross-racial interaction.

    • Acknowledgment that racial segregation conditions unjust policing practices across different geographic areas, meaning that areas with higher segregation often experience more punitive, surveillance-heavy, and less service-oriented policing, exacerbating inequalities.

  • Police Reform Agenda:

    • The narrative argues for direct confrontation of racial residential segregation within police reform initiatives, asserting that true police reform cannot occur without addressing the underlying systemic conditions of racial inequality they often uphold and reinforce.

Mechanisms of Pro-Segregation Policing
  1. Mass Criminalization:

    • Policies such as stop-and-frisk violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, disproportionately targeting low-income communities of color, leading to widespread mistrust, alienation, and a sense of being constantly under suspicion.

    • Police actions cycle individuals through repeated arrests and legal supervision for minor offenses (e.g., loitering, public disturbance), creating a pattern of legal entanglement that obstructs social mobility, hinders employment opportunities, and reinforces disadvantage within specific communities.

    • Judicial findings, like Judge Scheindlin’s opinion in Floyd v. City of New York (959959 F. Supp. 22d 668668 (S.D.N.Y. 20132013)), pointed to racially biased stopping and searching practices, concluding that the NYPD's stop-and-frisk program unconstitutionally targeted minority communities, violating their civil rights.

  2. Patrolling Borders:

    • Police actions include monitoring and excluding individuals perceived as 'out of place' in predominantly White neighborhoods, using pretexts like loitering or suspicious behavior to question, deter, and move individuals deemed to not belong.

    • The border patrol acts as a mechanism for maintaining racial boundaries and inhibiting cross-racial solidarity, effectively reinforcing segregation by controlling who belongs and who doesn't in certain areas, thereby sustaining racial homogeneity.

  3. Coordinating with Other Bureaucracies:

    • Third-Party Policing: An overlap exists between civil and criminal enforcement, tying police actions to compliance with private agreements and laws, such as housing ordinances against specific racial settlements, or enforcing landlord policies that indirectly lead to eviction and displacement in minority communities.

    • This blurring of lines between public law enforcement and private or civil regulations fosters exclusionary practices that disproportionately impact minority communities, often leading to harassment and displacement under the guise of maintaining order or property values.

  4. Constructing Jurisdiction:

    • Organizational structures of police departments segment communities along existing racial and socioeconomic lines (e.g., precinct boundaries), impacting the distribution of police services and interventions, often leading to disparate levels of protection or enforcement.

    • Resource allocation and officer assignments can depend on officer performance metrics (e.g., arrest quotas) or perceived crime levels, often favoring assignments to areas perceived as lower in crime (typically affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods) or where 'easier' arrests can be made, creating a two-tiered system of policing.

  5. Constructing Neighborhood Reputations:

    • Officers’ perceptions and narratives about neighborhoods strongly influence external perceptions, media coverage, and property values, labeling areas as either 'high-crime' or 'safe,' 'racially integrated' or 'segregated.' These labels can attract or deter investment and residents, thereby impacting community development and reinforcing existing social stratification.

  6. Distributing Racialized Economic Value:

    • Police presence, particularly in affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods, can create a sense of security that raises property values for residents by deterring perceived 'undesirables,' contributing to an exclusionary environment for lower-income groups and people of color.

    • The service expectations from police can skew towards protecting financial interests and property rights of affluent residents rather than enforcing law evenly or providing equitable public services to all communities, leading to gentrification and displacement.

Other Non-Criminal Functions of Policing
  • Political Repression:

    • Law enforcement can be utilized to intimidate, monitor, or undermine individuals and groups involved in social activism, protests, or political dissent, often under the guise of maintaining order or national security.

  • Criminalizing Poverty:

    • Policing often enforces social norms that disproportionately penalize those experiencing economic hardship, such as ticketing for vagrancy, loitering, or minor infractions that disproportionately affect the homeless or low-income populations.

  • Relationship with Education:

    • Police are invited into educational environments as school resource officers and role models, impacting perceptions and behavior amongst students, sometimes leading to the criminalization of minor disciplinary issues rather than addressing them through educational or counseling channels.

  • Symbolic State Power:

    • The police serve a crucial role in ceremonial functions, such as parades, public events, and funerals, representing authority, order, and state presence in civic life, contributing to a sense of security or, for some, intimidation.

Key Concept: What Do Police Do?
  • Criminal Functions:

    • Resolve or investigate crimes, including gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and identifying suspects.

    • Enforce laws, which includes issuing traffic citations, making arrests, and responding to reports of criminal activity.

  • Noncriminal Functions:

    • Shape and construct aspects of residential life, influencing everything from property values to social interactions and community development.

    • Enforce social norms and exercise symbolic power in public contexts, guiding public behavior and representing the authority of the state in everyday life.