Cognitive Psychology Lecture: Sensory Memory and Attention
Cognitive Neuroscience and Attention Chapter Overview
Transition from cognitive neuroscience to the attention chapter.
Sensory memory outlined as a prerequisite for understanding attention.
Historical context provided by a former colleague, Joe Brown's teaching methods.
Emphasis on a compiled textbook combining various cognitive topics.
Sensory Memory
Definition: Sensory memory is the initial storage system for sensory information, holding information for a brief period before it is processed further.
Precedes attention, critical for understanding how we process stimuli.
Unique registers exist for different senses (visual, auditory, tactile, etc.).
Historical Importance and Research
Sperling's research on visual sensory memory from 1971 considered foundational.
Atkinson and Shifrin's memory model provides a structural framework.
Memory Model Details
Components: Environmental input → Sensory memory register → Short-term working memory → Long-term memory.
Interaction between short-term working memory and long-term memory is emphasized.
Short-term and Long-term Memory
Short-term Memory Defined:
Limited capacity of 7 ± 2 items (George Miller's research, 1957).
Variability in the specific quantity due to attributes of stimuli.
Long-term Memory Characteristics:
Assumed to have unlimited capacity.
Retrieval cues play a critical role in memory access.
Capacity and Duration of Sensory Memory
Capacity of Sensory Memory:
Sperling’s findings indicated an average recall of 4-5 letters in a whole report condition, suggesting limits may reside in short-term memory.
Contrastingly, partial report method showed around 9 items can be accessed when cued.
Conclusion: Sensory memory capacity exceeds that of short-term memory.
Duration of Sensory Memory:
Contents in sensory memory are fleeting, observed to last between approximately 1/3 of a second to 1 second before decay occurs.
Visual persistence akin to a lightning flash was used to illustrate duration.
Auditory versus Visual Sensory Memory
Distinct temporal characteristics:
Auditory sensory memory lasts longer than visual memory.
Various experiments could further explore this contrast (e.g., dichotic listening tasks).
Cueing and Memory Interference
Types of Cueing Discussed:
Physical characteristic cues (size, location) versus identity cues (letters vs. numbers).
Results indicate the effectiveness of physical characteristic cues in memory retrieval.
Examples of Memory Interference:
Retroactive interference occurs when new information alters existing memories.
Classic studies such as Loftus and Palmer’s car accident study illustrated how suggestive questioning influences memory recall.
Memory Interference Phenomena
Proactive versus Retroactive Interference:
Definitions:
Proactive: Old memories interfere with new information.
Retroactive: New information interferes with the recall of older memories.
Study Design Breakdown:
Experiment examples provided to illustrate these phenomena.
Transition to Attention
Discusses the transition from sensory memory to attention, emphasizing information selection mechanisms.
The “cocktail party problem” highlights challenges in focusing on specific stimuli amidst distractions.
Broadbent's Filter Theory
Proposed model of attention as a filter—early selection model explaining how some information is processed while the rest is disregarded.
Experimental Tasks:
Dichotic listening and shadowing tasks outlined to explore attentional selection.
Right ear advantage linked to language processing in the left hemisphere.
Dichotic Listening and Shadowing
Results from various studies illustrate the nuances of early vs. late selection in attention processes.
Broadbent’s early selection theory versus Treisman’s attenuator model that allows partial access of unattended messages.
Treisman’s model suggests activation levels for content recognition vary, permitting certain words (like one’s name) to pass through thresholds more easily than others.
Visual Attention Theory
Posner's spotlight of attention:
An experimental approach for assessing how cues direct attention and affect response times to target stimuli.
Key Findings from Attention Tasks:
Valid cues facilitate faster responses compared to invalid cues.
EEG and MEG studies confirming early attentional signals in the brain.
Conclusion of Current Topics and Forward Outlook
Preliminary overview wrapping up sensory memory and attention transition topics.
Study of exogenous versus endogenous cueing is yet to be discussed, indicating upcoming content in future discussions.