Case Study: A Comparison of the Haiti and Christchurch Earthquakes

Overview of Earthquakes

  • Notable earthquakes for comparison:

    • Haiti Earthquake: January 2010, Port-au-Prince, Haiti

    • Christchurch Earthquakes: September and February 2010-2011, Christchurch, New Zealand

Earthquake Details

  • Haiti Earthquake:

    • Location: Port-au-Prince, Haiti

    • Date and Time: January 2010

    • Magnitude: 7.0

    • Depth of Focus: 13 km

    • Deaths: Estimated 200,000

  • Christchurch Earthquakes:

    • Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

    • Date and Time:

    • September 2010:

      • Magnitude: 7.1

      • Depth of Focus: 5 km

      • Deaths: 0

    • February 2011:

      • Time: 12:51

Earthquake Location

Date and Local Time

Magnitude

Depth of Focus

Deaths

Port-au-Prince, Haiti

January 2010

7.0

13 km

200,000 (estimated)

Christchurch, New Zealand

September 2010

7.1

5 km

0

Christchurch, New Zealand

February 2011

6.3

5km

185

Analysis of Death Toll

  • Comparison Insights:

    • The significant difference in death tolls cannot be solely attributed to:

    • Magnitude of the earthquakes

    • Time of day when earthquakes struck

    • Depth of focus

    • The epicenter of Haiti's earthquake was 25 km from the city, while Christchurch's 2011 earthquake had an epicenter only 10 km from the city center.

    • Population densities:

    • Port-au-Prince had a population of approximately 2.5 million.

    • Christchurch had a population of about 400,000.

The Haiti Earthquake

  • Tectonic Setting:

    • Resulted from movement along a fault on the destructive plate boundary between the Caribbean and North American plates.

    • Depth of movement was shallow, resulting in amplified shaking.

Effects on Lives and Property
  • Government estimates claimed 316,000 deaths; however, other estimates suggest 200,000.

  • More than 100,000 individuals were estimated to be injured.

  • Up to 1.5 million people left homeless.

  • Casualties and destruction data:

    • Hospitals and Government Buildings Destroyed: Yes

    • Residences Destroyed: 250,000

    • Commercial Buildings Destroyed: 30,000

  • Infrastructure impact:

    • Disruption to power and water supplies, loss of communication.

    • Aid was delayed due to destruction of airport control tower, port damage, and blocked roads.

    • Looting and violence hampered relief efforts, impacting safety of food and water supplies.

  • Cholera outbreaks caused by poor sanitation in temporary camps led to over 3,000 deaths in 2010, with further outbreaks resulting in about 8,600 deaths by 2015.

Reasons for Severity
  • Location: struck the densely populated capital city of Port-au-Prince.

  • Liquefaction: Much of the city built on loose sediments, leading to amplified seismic waves.

  • Infrastructure:

    • Haiti had no building regulations; most infrastructure built cheaply and precariously.

    • Heavy concrete buildings collapsed due to inadequate support reinforcement.

    • Many residents lived in makeshift shacks on unstable slopes.

  • Lack of preparedness due to minimal earthquake risk perception; last significant earthquake occurred in 1770.

  • Emergency services and military response were limited: no army and very few emergency service vehicles or personnel present.

Recovery Post-Haiti Earthquake

  • Dependency on Overseas Aid:

    • Poor resilience as recovery relied heavily on foreign assistance.

    • Three years after the earthquake, only half of debris cleared and ~280,000 people remained in camps, many without proper sanitation.

    • Economic impact: One-fifth of the population lost jobs, especially in clothing factories (largest employer).

  • Estimated economic cost of the earthquake was less than $US 9 billion.

    • Few individuals insured against losses, leading to high rebuilding costs without coverage.

The Christchurch Earthquakes

  • 2010 and 2011 Differences:

    • Most damage attributed to the 2011 aftershock following the 2010 earthquake which had already weakened buildings.

    • Shaking intensity for the 2011 earthquake was more than four times that of Haiti, resulting in significant structural failures.

Effects on Lives and Property of 2011 Earthquake
  • Destruction overview:

    • 1,000 major buildings destroyed.

    • Liquefaction caused many foundation failures, affecting houses in eastern suburbs.

    • Notable collapse: Grand Chancellor hotel dropped by 1 metre on one side.

  • Casualties:

    • More than half of the 185 deaths occurred in one building that collapsed and caught fire.

    • At least 1,500 injured.

  • Infrastructure impact:

    • Water and sewage systems damaged, power cuts experienced.

    • Restoration of services occurred quickly, many within a week; phone communication was disrupted only briefly.

    • Liquefaction raised road surfaces, complicating rescue operations.

  • Total economic cost of earthquake: approximately $US 40 billion, mainly due to rebuilding and insurance losses.

  • International aid was prompt due to undamaged airport facilities.

Perception of Earthquake Risk and Response in Christchurch

  • Actions by government agencies contributed to high resilience, minimizing effects compared to Haiti.

    • Strict Building Codes: Modern structures designed to withstand earthquakes occurring once every 500 years.

    • Emergency Planning: Immediate state of emergency declaration allowed rapid coordinated response from police, fire, and defense forces.

    • Usage of Technology: Utilized satellite imagery from US Geological Survey for real-time assessment.

    • Quick restoration of electricity and mains water, distribution of portable sanitation services.

    • Provision of mobile homes for displaced individuals during rebuilding efforts.

    • New buildings constructed with maximum heights of 28 meters and strict earthquake-proofing measures implemented.