Urban Wildlife Management
Urban Wildlife Management
What is Urban?
Developed areas
Farmlands
Cities
Urban vs. Suburban?
When does urban end?
Census Definitions
Peru: “100 contiguous swellings”
Sierra Leone: “2,000 inhabitants”
Denmark: “built-up area with at least 200 inhabitants, and where distance between buildings is not more than 200 meters (1/10 mi), unless the interruption is due to facilities, parks, cemeteries, etc”
Japan: “area with 50,000 inhabitants or more, in which at least 60% of buildings are in the main built-up areas and at least 60% of people are engaged in non-ag business”
United States: “Area in which population density is 1,000 people per square mile and total population is 2,500 or more”
What are cities from a wildlife perspective?
Wildlife can’t define landscape features, only recognize cities as a new landscape with new features
A new landscape with new features
Vegetation removal for houses/stores/farms
Landscape fragmentation like roads, prevent animal crossings
Extensive ground cover change
things like buildings and roofs, changes of rain movement
Altered hydrology
water run-off into stream, percolating through ground, dripping off leaf
macroinvertebrates pushed off rocks
natural areas have more steady streams unlike urban areas
Altered noise and light regimes
loud cities, does not stop at night
interrupts animal calls
sea turtles follow moonlight, confused by local light sources
Pollution
Invasive species
exotic plants/animals
outcompete native wildlife
Challenges
Remember Leopold’s “Plow, cow, gun, match, and axe”
Only left with axe
Hunting, fire, and land management become difficult/dangerous to implement
can’t shoot guns in urban areas, can’t do prescribed burns, and animals like cows unable to access
Crime and/or fear of crime
difficult for wildlife biologists to perform research
Police/difficulty with landowner permissions
RED TAPE
need to go through a lot of approval stages before solving anything
Why manage wildlife here at all?
Many humans live in urban areas, and humans love wildlife
Animals have great capacity to do damage
Disease (rats)
Infrastructure damage
car collisions
other human harm
social carrying capacity
Urban wildlife are beneficial and fascinating
pigeons are pre-adapted to urban areas
bats and habitat
geese like fountains
robins like lawns for worms
raccoons/possums/crows/house sparrows and food… we provide a lot of sugary/fatty food for wildlife (and throw it in the trash)
they can do better in our environment than in the wild
Urban Exploiters
Traits:
omnivorous
dietary generalists
tolerant of human presence
able to avoid humans
flying
hiding
chimney swifts hide in chimney, similar to natural habitat
climbing
Urban Adapters
Species also tolerant of human development
white-tailed deer
peregrine falcon
coyotes
squirrels
Behaviorally flexible
Do not depend on urban landscapes
Urban Avoiders*
Traits:
Sensitive to human landscape change
Have large home ranges
mountain lions
Habitat specialists
loggerhead shrike, predatory bird, Hawthorne trees impale prey
red-cockaded woodpecker, longleaf pine forests
elk
hellbender, healthy clean water
*they don’t persist here because they die, not avoiding, but excluded
So what can we do?
Make urban parks, like Central Park, Carol Park
urban parks are often:
too small
too isolated
lacking the appropriate vegetation structure to support non-generalist species
What about greenways?
can be good
So the message is clear: Dense urbanization is bad for wildlife
Except it’s not!
Dense human development is an excellent way to save space for wildlife conservation
Vertical growth → less space use through using tall buildings instead of expanding
Dense human development can be a great conservation tool!
New York City’s Counties vs. Raleigh’s Counties save space for people/mile… 1/8 of the space
NC pop = 10.5 million, NYC is 8.3 million
if you condensed all of NC pop, could fit it into Wake County, leaving the rest of the entire state for wildlife!
Zoning
Zoning determines what you can do where
Determines allowance for big and small lots, low-income housing, green areas
Reduced transportation
no need to drive because houses and stores and work are close
Human Dimensions
You can’t get people to do things just because it makes sense from a wildlife point of view
We can make some changes that would provide habitat elements for a number of species
Land management one property at a time
How to support non-generalist species in urban areas
Do away with lawns
they have no wildlife value
Native vegetation—provided varies structure
make it messy!
temporarily varied food for wildlife, different seasons
Leave snags up (when possible)
habitat for woodpecker, bats
Provide seasonal variation in food sources
Try to live near where you want to go
fewer drivers—less demand for roads—less car traffic—less fragmentation
Take home messages
Provide incentives to make more wildlife-friendly properties
Cities (humans in them) are part of nature, not apart from nature
We should not pick and choose where we are going to be stewards
Land management is people management, city planning included
There are winners and losers
Try to be more like rats, look for opportunity
The world is urbanizing