Devonport Residential Complex Project Notes

Devonport Residential Complex - ENBU791 Industry Project

Project Overview

Team Composition
  • Team Members: Tessa Handford (221742), Keelan Harty (22172785), Nathaniel Roma (21150190), Aaryal Prasad (22179702)
Project Management & Communication
  • Site Location: Devonport, North Auckland - chosen for its community vibe, waterfront, mix of residents, and access to local amenities.
Client Objectives
  • The project must be sustainable and beneficial to the local community while tackling environmental issues.
    • Reducing CO2 Emissions: Utilizing modern construction methods to significantly cut carbon emissions.
    • Minimising Waste: Reducing waste at every project stage (materials, energy, and time).
    • Whole Life Costing: Considering the project's overall lifetime costs, not just initial expenses, to allow for long-term savings.
    • Inclusive Amenities: Providing various residential units and facilities to promote health, well-being, and cultural diversity (e.g., gyms, swimming pools, community areas).

Potential Risks Assessment

  • Using Dr. Meredith Belbin’s Team Role Theory to understand team member strengths and roles.
Challenges - Team Dynamics
  • Clear communication is critical.
    • Information Sharing:
      • Instagram group chat for quick updates.
      • Facebook Messenger for broader and external discussions.
      • Weekly meetings on Fridays to review progress and plan.
    • Potential Communication Barriers:
      • Dominant team members potentially leaving others out.
      • Timing issues in digital communication delaying responses.
    • Meeting Schedule:
      • Weekly Recap Meetings: Every Friday.
      • Post Meeting Updates: For checking in on tasks and immediate action items.
Concept Design
  • The concept design phase involves evaluating design options to maximize the site area while adhering to archaeological exclusion zone constraints.
  • The goal is to balance functioning and innovative use of space.

Risk Management

1. Construction and Site Management Risks
  • High Water Table & Soil Conditions:
    • Risk: Soil instability due to proximity to the water.
    • Mitigation: Engage geotechnical engineers early, explore deep foundation solutions, and monitor groundwater levels.
  • Limited Access Roads:
    • Risk: Narrow streets hindering material transport.
    • Mitigation: Solid logistics plan, deliveries during off-peak hours, and using smaller vehicles.
  • Ground Conditions:
    • Risk: Unknown ground conditions.
    • Mitigation: Thorough soil testing and geological surveys before construction.
  • Material Supply Delays:
    • Risk: Project delays due to material shortages.
    • Mitigation: Secure reliable suppliers and create backup plans.
  • Equipment Issues:
    • Risk: Costly and dangerous breakdowns.
    • Mitigation: Regular maintenance and inspections.
2. Health and Safety Risks
  • Workplace Safety:
    • Risk: Construction inherently involves high-risk activities.
    • Mitigation: Comply with all safety and legal requirements, ensure correct licenses and competencies, and meet site-specific safety requirements detailed in the HSE plan.
  • Mental Health and Wellbeing:
    • Risk: Detrimental effects of tight deadlines on mental health.
    • Mitigation: Build a supportive team culture with regular check-ins and access to mental health resources.
  • On-Site Accidents:
    • Risk: Accidents despite safety measures.
    • Mitigation: Enforce strict safety protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, regular monitoring through KPIs, proper investigations, and lessons learned to prevent recurrence.
3. Environmental and Community Risks
  • Water Runoff Pollution:
    • Risk: Sediment and pollutants entering the ocean.
    • Mitigation: Stormwater management plan including silt fences and erosion controls.
  • Biodiversity and Environmental Impact:
    • Risk: Disruption of local ecosystems.
    • Mitigation: Environmental assessments and measures to protect sensitive areas.
  • Permit Delays:
    • Risk: Delayed project timeline.
    • Mitigation: Submit applications early and follow up with authorities.
4. Financial and Stakeholder Risks
  • Going Over Budget:
    • Risk: Unplanned costs.
    • Mitigation: Regular budget reviews and contingency funds.
  • Contractor Financial Stability:
    • Risk: Work stoppage due to contractor issues.
    • Mitigation: Thorough vetting of contractors (background checks and references).
  • Stakeholder Changes and Scope Creep:
    • Risk: Added time and cost due to mid-project changes.
    • Mitigation: Clear change management process and transparent communication.
  • Community Opposition:
    • Risk: Delays or resistance due to community concerns.
    • Mitigation: Early engagement, transparency, and prompt response to concerns.
  • Legal Disputes:
    • Risk: Contract issues.
    • Mitigation: Clear contracts and legal advice for dispute resolution.
Team Dynamic Challenges
  • Different communication styles leading to misunderstandings.
  • Conflicts between creative ideas and practical constraints (time/budget).
  • The difficulty of integrating new team members and ensuring everyone's voice is heard.

Risk Matrix

Legislative & Cultural Considerations

  • Resource Management Act: Ensuring environmental protection and stakeholder engagement.
  • New Zealand Building Act and Building Code: Upholding safety and quality standards.
  • Health and Safety at Work Act: Prioritizing worker safety.
  • Te Tiriti o Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi): Involving Māori interests and communities.

Final Recommendations & Focus

Concept Design 2

Final Design

  • The initial concept design was ambitious but practically difficult to construct due to its unique shape and size.
  • It was also unsuitable for the primary residents due to mobility challenges and the large environment.
Revised Design
  • A revised design was developed to meet the needs with an efficient layout in a residential building.
  • The building now has a compact footprint and is oriented vertically to maximize usable space.
  • The new design is a five-story square building using a steel and concrete structure.
  • It simplifies construction within the archaeological exclusion zone.
  • The design provides better access for residents moving throughout the building.
  • The design offers a viable option and respects the surrounding community and environment.

Current Design

  • The approach ensures the project meets the client’s goals while fostering sustainability and community integration.
  • Continuous exploration of environmental impacts and consistent stakeholder engagement will occur.
  • The project prioritizes strong collaboration and communication to stay on track and effectively support the needs of the Devonport community.