Personality
Psyc week 9
Personality
Personality: an individual’s characteristic style of behaving, thinking, and feeling
The study of personality – developing explanations of the basis for psychological differences among people
Psychologists explain personality differences by thinking in terms of prior and anticipated events that affect personality or reveal personality characteristics
Measuring personality: self-report
Personality inventories rely on self-reporting (e.g. multiple choice or forced choice)
self-report: a questionnaire (or interview) that asks people to indicate the extent to which sets of statements/adjectives describe their own behaviour or mental state
response bias?
Social desirability
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2-RF – type of clinical questionnaire assessing personality and psychological problems
Measuring personality: projective techniques
Projective test: uses standard series of ambiguous stimuli designed to elicit unique responses that reveal inner aspects of an individual’s personality
Designed to circumvent limitations of self-report
Relies on analysis of ambiguous info
Open to subjective interpretation
E.g. Rorschach Inkblot test: individual interpretations of the meaning of a set of unstructured inkblots are analyzed to identify respondents’ inner feelings and interpret their personality structure
E.g. thematic apperception test (TAT): respondents reveal underlying motives, concerns, and the way they see the social world through the stories they make up about ambiguous pictures of people
Has a set of themes (success or failure, competition/jealousy, conflict with parents and siblings, aggression, sexuality)
Not much reliability or validity around these tests
Question if they can tell us much about personality
Measuring personality: use of technology
E.g. Smartphones, wearable devices, real-time analysis of social media posts
RQ: are women more talkative than men?
RQ: can we determine someone’s personality from their SM posts?
Traits
Trait: relatively stable disposition to behave in a particular and consistent way
a trait may be a preexisting disposition that causes a person’s behaviour (personality inventories), or the motivation that guides the behaviour (projective tests)
researchers have described and measured hundreds of traits over the decades e.g. authoritarianism
The big five personality traits
five factor model
accounts for variability without overlap, multiple observer agreeability, and is reliable across ages, cultures, and languages (i.e. may be universal)
are associated with predictable patterns of behaviour and social outcomes
overall stable across lifespan
acronym for the “Big 5” that makes up Personality
OCEAN or CANOE (Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness (to experience), Extroversion)
How to measure Big 5 Traits and Facets
NEO Personality Inventory-Revised: Self-report
Individual Uniqueness
Categorical/ discontinuous
Introvert vs. extrovert
Dimensional/ continuous (introvert <--------> extrovert scale)
Have our own individual fingerprint on the Big 5
Stability of Personality
People are relatively consistent in their thoughts, feelings, and actions across situations and over time
Behaviours can adapt and change
Perceiving personality
A target was video taped engaging in regular conversation
Completed the NEO personality inventory
Rated by perceivers
The targets level of agreeableness was accurately identified after 20s (ppl are generally good at detecting other peoples behaviour
Personality predicts:
Student GPA (high level of conscientiousness)
Career success (high conscientiousness, low neuroticism)
Career type
Risk factor for:
Depression (high neuroticism, low extraversion)
Why?
Personality influence emotions, cognitions and behaviours
Activity
What are 5 fav letter of alphabet?
A, D, S, L, R
On scale 0-5 rate how much you like the word January (repeat for months)
Jan – 3
Feb – 2
March – 3
April – 4
May – 4
June- 5
July – 5
Aug – 5
Sept – 2
Oct – 3
Nov – 4
Dec – 3
The self: personality in the mirror
We are able to recognize ourselves in mirrors by 18 months
Self-recognition in mirrors:
Enables reflexive thinking
Directs attention to our own thoughts, feelings, and actions
Enables us to construct ideas about our own personality
Self-recognition leads to:
Self-concept: what we think about ourselves,, and
Self- esteem: how we feel about ourselves
Self- Concept
A person’s explicit knowledge of their own behaviours, traits, and other personal characteristics
Affects behaviour throughout life
Develops from social experiences
Sense of self is largely constructed through relationships
E.g. feedback from parents, teachers, siblings, friends
Organized in 2 ways: (don’t rlly need to know)
1) self-narrative: story we tell about ourselves
2) self-schemas: sets of traits we find important and use to define ourselves
Self concept is stable and promotes consistency in behaviour
Self-verification: tendency to seek evidence to confirm the self-concept
Self-Esteem
Extent ot which one likes, values and accepts the self
High self esteem: highly agree with +ve statements and strongly disagree with -ve statements about themselves
Benefits of self-esteem include status, belongings, security
High: happier and healthier, better stress coping, persist at difficult tasks
Low: ambiguous feedback as rejection, eating disorder risk factor
Self-esteem could be a kind of ‘sociometer’
Belonging to groups is adaptive (evolutionary)
High self-esteem arises from being accepted and valued by others
Personal judgements also matter: especially comparisons to others
Areas of importance vary
Self-serving bias: people’s tendency to take credit for their success but downplay responsibility for their failures; protects self-esteem
Better-than-average effect: people tend to see themselves as better than average in most positive domains (80-90% of drivers)
Implicit egotism argues that people are generally unaware of their preference for things similar to themselves (e.g. own name)
Narcissism: trait that reflects a grandiose view of the self alongside a tendency to seek admiration from and exploit others
Personality Part 2a
The Humanistic-existential approach
Emphasizes individual’s inherent drive towards self-actualization (i.e. realizing one’s potential)
We are always striving to become the best version of ourselves that we can be
Humanistic and existential theorists focus on how healthy choices shape personality
Humanistic: emphasize a +ve, optimistic view of human nature; e.g. goodness and potential for growth
Existentialist: focus on the individual as a responsible agent, free to create his/her life while negotiating issues of meaning and the reality of death
Human needs and self-actualization
Self-actualizing tendency: human motive towards realizing inner potential
Major factor in personality development
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs recognizes this as a higher need
Individual personality differences arise from the environment (facilitations or blocks) that are attempts to satisfy psychological needs
Mismatch between your goals and your true nature and capabilities = unhappiness
Flow
Engagement in tasks that match our abilities, causing a state of focus and happiness
Full immersion in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment in the process of the activity
Balance of anxiety and boredom
Being in the zone (or sometimes “on a roll”)
Skill-level isn’t intelligence, it’s time
Humanists believe that states of flow reflect the realization of one’s potential and represent the height of personality development
Personality as existence
Existential approach: regards personality as governed by an individual’s ongoing choices and decisions in the context of the realities of life and death
Awareness of our existence:
+ve side: bring richness and dignity to our life
-ve side: force us to confront realities that are difficult to face (e.g. human suffering, death)
Angst: the difficulties we face in life in finding meaning in life and death, and in accepting the responsibility of making free choices
Personality Part 3 – week 9
The social-cognitive approach
Views personality in terms of how we think about situations encountered in daily life and behave in response to them
How personality and situation interact to cause behaviour and shape personality further
How we experience and interpret situations
Person-situation controversy: is behaviour caused more by personality or by situational factors?
Personality traits may do little to predict behavior (average r = .30)
Behaviours may not transfer in different situations
Information about situation and about personality predicts behaviour
Personal constructs and goals
Personal constructs: dimensions people use in making sense of their experiences
Differences in perspective in the perceiver’s personality are key to personality differences
Perspective is also reflected in personal goals
Outcome expectancies: assumptions about likely consequences of a behaviour
Direct, vicarious (ex. mom walks you the long way around to get to school because of her fear of a dog, so now you have a fear), informational learning
Combine with goals to produce characteristic style of behaviour
Locus of control: person’s tendency to perceive the control of rewards as internal (healthier, less anxiety and stress) to the self or external (in the environment (e.g. chance/luck/result of others)
Biology of Personality
Genes, traits and personality
Behavioural genetics looks for correlations between monozygotic (100% genes - same egg shell) and dizygotic (50% genes) twins
The greater the overlap in genes, the greater similarity in personality
Reared-apart identical twins end up having just as similar personalities as those reared together
E.g. similar opinions and worldviews
Personality variability among individuals: 40% from genes; 60% from environment
Fairly stable across personality domains
Shared environmental factors show that these environments have little impact (e.g. a large change in your life like parental divorce doesn’t have as big of an impact compared to genetics)
Anatomy & Physiology
Changes in personality can be caused by:
Brain damage (e.g. Phineas Gage – had drill shoot right through his brain - personality changed)
Brain pathologies (Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, tumors)
Pharmaceutical treatments that change brain chemistry
Gender differences: biology or culture?
Researchers have found reliable gender differences
Women are more: verbally expressive, sensitive to non-verbal cues, more nurturing, more agreeable, conscientious, neurotic, likely to engage in more relational aggression
Men are: more assertive, greater sensation-seeking, slightly higher self-esteem; more physically aggressive
Other traits show no differences (e.g. helpfulness is the same for both)
More personality similarities than differences (researchers just want to look for the differences in their studies)
Differences attributed to sex hormones during puberty and culture
E.g. testosterone effects
Look at transgender men who want injections of testosterone, did personality test before and then after
Evolutionary perspectives argue for the social role theory
Personality characteristics result from different cultural standards and expectations between the genders
Androgyny = better adjustment
Traits are wired in the brain
Extraversion may be the most relevant to neurophysiological mechanism; variation in alertness
Over/under stimulation of the part of the brain responsible for arousal
Two brain systems may be responsible for the extraversion and neuroticism:
Behavioural activation system (BAS) – approach (go system)
Extravert: highly reactive BAS
Behavioural inhibition system (BIS) – inhibition (stop system)
Introvert: highly reactive BIS
Operate independently – can have both
These BIS/BAS systems relate to how the brain (and consequent behaviour) works; they are not “structures”
Do animals have personalities?
Can use the big five (OCEAN)
Dimensions of stable personality types have been identified in certain animal species; e.g. dogs, hyenas, octopi, guppies
Personality part 4
The Psychodynamic Approach to Personality
Psychodynamic approach: view that personality is formed by needs and desires that mostly operate outside of conscious awareness
Developed by Sigmund Freud
Used to explain onset of mental disorders
Freud proposed that the mind consists of 3 independent systems that together determine the personality’s structure:
The Id, the ego, and the superego
Id: part of the mind containing the drives present at birth; source of our bodily needs, wants, desires and impulses especially sexual and aggressive drives (operates via pleasure principle)
Entirely submersed in our unconscious
Ego: developed through contact with the external world; enables us to deal with life’s practical demands (reality principle)
Mediator between id and superego
Superego: mental system that reflects the internalization of cultural rules, mainly learned through parental authority (like conscience)
Id, ego, and superego are in constant internal conflict (this causes anxiety)
Defense mechanisms: unconscious coping mechanisms that reduce anxiety generated by threats from unacceptable impulses
E.g. rationalization
Giving a reasonable-sounding explanation for unacceptable feelings and behaviour to hide own underlying motives/feelings
E.g. projection
Attributing own negative feelings/motives to others
Psychosexual Stages and personality development
Distinct early life stages through which personality is formed as children experience sexual pleasures from specific body areas and caregivers redirect/ interfere with those pleasures
Not dependable facts to refer to
Oral stage
Birth to 18 months
Pleasure from mouth (via eating and drinking)
Experience centers on the pleasures and frustrations associated with the mouth, sucking, and being fed
Anal stage
18 months to 3 yrs
Pleasure from anus (via withholding or expelling feces
What does “anal retentive” mean?
Experience centers on the pleasures and frustrations associated with the anus, retention and expulsion of feces and urine, and toilet training
Phallic stage
18 months to 4/5 yrs
Gender differences are notices – child relates to same sex parent
Experience centers on the pleasures, conflict, and frustration associated with the phallic-genital region, as well as coping with powerful incestuous feelings of love, hate, jealousy, and conflict
Latency stage
4/5 yrs to adolescence
Sexual drives lay dormant
Time for coming together of the mature adult personality with a capacity to love, work, and relate to others in a mutually satisfying and reciprocal manner
Genital stage
Adolescence
Sexual urges reawaken, interest turns to relationships