T1 - Course Introduction, Group Dynamics, and Research Methodology Note

Semester Assessment Outline and Schedule

  • Total course marks are distributed across four primary assessment categories:

    • Final Exam: Weighted at 40%40\%. This is an in-person assessment occurring during the End of Semester Exam Period, scheduled between 7/11/20267/11/2026 and 21/11/202621/11/2026.

    • Critical Essay on Improving Personal Communication: Weighted at 30%30\%. The submission deadline is 6/10/20266/10/2026 at 4:00pm4:00\,\text{pm}.

    • Public Speaking Presentation: Weighted at 10%10\%. These occur during assigned tutorials between 12/10/202612/10/2026 and 23/10/202623/10/2026.

    • Tutorial Worksheets/Problem Set: Weighted at 20%20\%. Worksheets must be handed in during or following the final tutorial, scheduled between 19/10/202619/10/2026 and 23/10/202623/10/2026.

  • Assessment resources, including marking criteria and information sheets, are available on Blackboard. It is recommended to wait until these are reviewed in detail during tutorials before commencing work to ensure all necessary information is understood.

Psychology Student Support Tutors (PSST) Service

  • The UQ School of Psychology provides an assignment help service known as PSST.

  • The service offers assistance with several areas of academic development:

    • Generating ideas for assignments and reports.

    • Planning assignments.

    • Improving the structure and flow of written work.

    • Providing writing tips specific to assignments.

    • Offering study tips for examinations.

  • Due to high demand, this service often books out far in advance. Students are encouraged to book appointments early in the semester.

Grading Philosophy and Expectations

  • The grading process does not involve taking marks away from a total. Instead, every student starts at 00 and earns marks by meeting specific marking criteria.

  • The Glass Metaphor: Assessments should be viewed like an empty glass of water. As requirements in the marking criteria are met, water is added to the glass.

  • Quality Variations: Marking criteria allow for a range of quality from no work to outstanding work. The highest marks are reserved for work that is exceptional in quality.

  • To earn a very high grade, work must demonstrate an outstanding understanding of the topic and extreme clarity in writing.

  • Commendable and well-done work will receive a good grade but may not necessarily receive full marks; failing to get full marks does not mean the work was not successful.

Worksheet Completion and Scoring

  • There are 1010 worksheets in total throughout the semester, each worth 2.5%2.5\%.

  • The 1% Component: This is earned by answering the question at the end of the corresponding week's lecture. This task must be completed online before attending the tutorial and is cross-referenced during the session.

  • The 1.5% Component: This is earned by properly completing all questions on the worksheet by the end of the tutorial session.

  • Full Credit (20%): If a student submits at least 88 out of the 1010 worksheets (including the pre-tutorial homework questions), they will receive the full 20%20\% allocated to this assessment category.

Group Dynamics and "Grouphate"

  • Tutorial groups are randomly assigned and remain consistent throughout the semester for bouncing ideas and collaborative projects.

  • The Concept of Grouphate: Termed by Sorenson (1981), many students experience negative feelings toward group work due to poor past experiences, such as being the only contributor.

  • Cultural Context: Individualistic cultures often prioritize individual achievement, making group interdependence feel difficult.

  • Group Realities: Challenges include working with people who are not chosen friends, disparities in effort levels, and the struggle between talking too much and not talking at all.

  • The Camel Metaphor: There is a saying that "a camel is a horse designed by a group," reflecting the potential for disjointed results when collaboration is poorly managed.

The Value of Group Work in Professional Contexts

  • Modern employers prioritize three core skills:

    1. Oral communication skills

    2. Interpersonal skills

    3. Teamwork skills

  • Professional relevance: Managers spend between 30%30\% and 80%80\% of their time in meetings.

  • Kreps (1990) argues that group interactions are the primary sites for accomplishing major activities in modern organizations.

  • Personal Benefits (Keyton, Harmon, & Frey, 1996):

    • Students who like their groups tend to achieve better grades at university.

    • Increased group experience reduces anxiety in future interactions.

    • Membership in social groups correlates with being happier, healthier, and living longer.

Building Group Relationships: Activities and Identity

  • Fast Friends Game: A structured activity to build quick rapport. It involves a list of 4040 questions. Each member picks a number, and everyone in the group answers the corresponding question in detail (avoiding simple "yes" or "no" answers).

  • Group Naming: Every group must select a name that reflects a shared interest or sense of humor (e.g., "The Detectives" for Sherlock Holmes fans). This name must be recorded in activity 3.13.1 of the worksheet.

  • Communication Infrastructure: Groups are required to create a shared Google Doc. One member creates the document and sets the sharing permissions to allow all members to edit. Contact details and preferred communication methods (e.g., email, Facebook) must be exchanged.

Public Speaking Presentation: The Mini Study

  • The presentation (worth 10%10\%) is based on a "mini study" conducted within the tutorial groups.

  • The Research Question: Each group must identify one construct or variable that they believe has a relationship with communication skills.

  • Process:

    1. The group identifies a variable (e.g., personality traits, habits).

    2. Every group's question is compiled into an online survey.

    3. The survey include a self-report scale to measure communication skills.

    4. Tutors and staff analyze the results from the collected data.

  • Presentation Structure: Individual speeches must recount the study using the following format:

    • Introduction

    • Method

    • Results

    • Discussion

  • While the study is conducted as a group, the talks and marks are assigned individually.

Research Skills: Google Scholar Searches

  • Effective research requires knowing existing literature rather than relying solely on intuition or hunches, which are often incorrect.

  • Search Strategies: Using Google Scholar to find predictors of communication skills.

  • Example Search Terms:

    • "Predictors of communication skills"

    • "Spicy foods communication skills"

  • Case Study (Riggio & Taylor, 2000): A study titled "Personality and communication skills as predictors of hospice nurse performance" published in the Journal of Business and Psychology, Volume 1515, Issue 22, pages 351359351-359.

    • This research used job analysis to identify personality dimensions and communication skills (social competence and empathy) as predictors of performance.

Questions & Discussion

  • Question: How many people dislike being in groups?

  • Response: Many people raise their hands, often because of bad experiences where they felt they were the only ones contributing.

  • Instructions for Group Discussion: Groups must discuss and record the characteristics of the best and worst communicators they have ever met. Every member must propose one specific 'thing' they believe relates to being a good or bad communicator for activity 4.14.1.