Chapter 26
Phylogeny-Methods for Classification of Organisms
Image shown
Introduction to Phylogeny
All organisms:-
Composed of one or more cells.
Carry out metabolism.
Transfer energy with ATP.
Encode DNA.
Tremendous diversity exists
Biologists group organisms based on shared characteristics.
Categorizing Species Traits
Traits shared due to common ancestry classify organisms by evolutionary history.
Carl Linnaeus: Taxonomy Pioneer
Carl Linneaus [Swedish; 1707–1778]
Professor of Botany, Uppsala University
Developed:-
A system of Taxonomy.
Use of binomial nomenclature.
Applied his system to all plants and animals known at the time.
Linnaean Taxonomy
Carolus Linnaeus developed taxonomy based on resemblances (grouping similar species).
Key features:-
Two-part names (binomial nomenclature).
Hierarchical classification.
Hierarchical Ranks
A group at any level of hierarchy: taxon.
Scientific name: binomial (genus species).
Genus and Species
The two lowest ranks are Genus and Species
An organism’s name is constructed by combining the Genus with the Species designation
Genus is Capitalized but the species designation is lower case, and both are italicized or underlined
Humans belong to the Genus Homo and the species designation of modern humans is Homo sapiens
Classification and Phylogeny
Evolutionary history is a branching diagram: Phylogenetic tree.
Linnaean System Limitations
Molecular data show hierarchy is inadequate.
Taxonomic ranks not monophyletic.
Artificial grouping.
Linnaean Resemblances vs. Evolution
Linnaean system based on resemblances and NOT evolutionary relationships.
While it distinguishes groups, it doesn't show evolutionary relationships.
Two Classification Systems Summary
Linnaean system is based on resemblances and NOT on evolutionary relationships - hierarchical ranks are based on degree of resemblance and not ancestor-descent relationship
Phylogenetic tree: hierarchical ranks are based on ancestor-descent relationship
Linking Classification and Phylogeny
Linnaean system does not always reflect relationships.- Species losing key features may be misclassified.
Embryogenesis may show relatedness, not adulthood.
DNA evidence may support reclassification.
Bases for Classification
Difficulties in aligning Linnaean classification with phylogeny have led many systematists to propose that classification be based entirely on evolutionary relationships.
Classification and Evolutionary Relationships
Proposed to base classification only on evolutionary relationships.
Only groups including ancestor and descendants would be named.
Phylogenies and Systematics
Phylogeny: Evolutionary history.
Systematics: Classifying organisms and determining their evolutionary relationships.
Systematists construct phylogenies (evolutionary trees).
Visualizing Phylogenetic Relationships
Phylogenetic trees are hypothesis about relationships.
Branch point: Divergence from common ancestor.
Evolutionary lineage: Ancestral sequence to taxon.
Sister taxa: Groups sharing a recent common ancestor.
Phylogenetic Tree Caveats
Trees show descent, not necessarily phenotypic similarity.
Trees do not indicate when species evolved or the amount of change in a lineage
Do not assume a taxon evolved from its neighbor.
Tree Diagrams
Phylogenetic trees can be drawn horizontally, vertically, or diagonally without changing the relationships between groups
*Image shown
Tree Branches and Taxa
Tree branches can be rotated around a branch point without changing what they convey about evolutionary relationships
The order in which taxa appear at the branch tips is not significant
Summary of Key Concepts
A lineage that diverges from all other members of the group early in the history of the group is called a basal taxon
*Image shown
Understanding Ancestor-Descendant Relationships
One of the great challenges of modern science is to understand the history of ancestor–descendant relationships that unites all forms of life on Earth, from the earliest single-celled organisms to the complex organisms we see around us today.
*Image shown
Phylogenies: Data Sources
Data on morphology, genes, & biochemistry useful for evolutionary relationships.
Features from common ancestry are most useful.
Homologies: Molecular & Morphological
Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry: homologies.
Similar morphology or DNA: Closely related.
Morphological divergence: Great even when genetically similar.- Hawaiian silverswords range in size from trees to shrubs.
Sorting Homology from Analogy
Distinguish homology (shared ancestry) from analogy (convergent evolution).
Analogy: Superficial similarities evolve in unrelated species responding to natural selection by adapting to similar conditions.- Ex: Australian "mole" and African golden mole show adaptation to similar lifestyles, not shared ancestry
Homology Defined
Homology: Similarity from shared ancestry, another form of evolution evidence
Related species can have similar features but function differently
Anatomical Homologies
Homologous structures: Anatomical resemblances variations of a structural theme from common ancestor.- Mammal forelimbs have same bones, different functions.
Anatomical Evidence for Evolution
Homologous structures: Different appearances/functions, same body part in common ancestor.
Mammal forelimbs: Homologous structures.
Different functions, same ancestor structure
Image shown
*Image shown
Anatomical and Molecular Homologies
Comparative embryology: anatomical homologies not visible in adult organisms
Vertebrate embryos have a post-anal tail and pharyngeal arches.
Arches develop into structures with very different functions in adults from different vertebrate groups
Evidence through Anatomy
Vestigial structures: Features served a function in ancestor now remains.
Snakes arose from ancestors with legs, some skeletons retain vestiges of pelvis.
Image shown
Convergent Evolution
Biogeography: the study of the geographic distribution of species
Some plants and animals have similar appearance but are only distantly related
Convergent evolution: the independent development of similar structures in organisms that are not directly related
*Convergent evolution is usually seen in animals and plants that live in similar environments
Resemblance Due to Convergent Evolution
*Convergent evolution is the evolution of similar, or analogous, features in distantly related groups
*Analogous traits arise not through common ancestry, but through independent adaptation to similar environments
*For example, the sugar glider is an Australian marsupial that superficially resembles the flying squirrel, a North American eutherian
Convergent evolution in burrowers
*Superficial similarities evolve in unrelated species through convergent evolution in response to natural selection to similar environmental conditions
*For example, similarities between the Australian “mole” and the African golden mole result from adaptation to similar lifestyles, not shared ancestry
Image shown
Mammals
Marsupials and placentals
*Marsupials: young are born in an immature condition and held in a pouch until they develop
Placentals: young are not born until they can safely survive in the external environment
Convergence among fast-swimming predators
*Image shown
Evaluation of Molecular Data
Evaluating sections of a sequence using DNA requires alignment.
*closely related species vary little along the DNA sequence
*More sequence similarity correlates with homology