U.S. Legal System and Common Law Overview

Chapter 1: Introduction

  • Professor Susie Salmon introduces the overview of the U.S. Legal system.

    • Focus: Introduction to the common law, the legal reasoning in U.S. courts.

    • Importance: Aimed at providing context for learning legal language and thinking.

  • Audience:

    • History majors, government majors, legal history enthusiasts, APUSH students, those with experience in the court system.

  • Purpose: To orient students, provide background, and establish a framework for understanding how U.S. lawyers analyze legal issues.

Understanding Common Law

  • Definition and Significance of Common Law:

    • The U.S. operates under a common law system, which is complex and presents both challenges and opportunities.

    • Key question posed: Who makes the law?

    • Separation of Powers Doctrine:

    • Congress passes laws.

    • Judiciary interprets and applies those laws.

    • Complexity: Judges, lawyers, and litigants all play roles in making law.

    • Judges craft opinions influenced by compelling briefs.

    • Lawyers push the law’s boundaries by arguing new fact situations.

    • Litigation can create case law, influencing legislation.

    • Agreements negotiated by lawyers can challenge existing laws.

Historical Context of Common Law

  • Common Law Origins:

    • Pre-Code era relied on customs, practices, and traditions for societal problem-solving.

    • Example of early codes: Code of Hammurabi from ancient Babylon (circa 1760 BCE).

    • Focus: Prescribing punishments for criminal offenses (e.g., wrongful ensnarement leading to execution).

  • The transition to formal laws reflects the evolution of societal norms and decision-making processes.

Chapter 2: Common Law System

  • Distinction from Civil Law Systems:

    • Civil law systems use codes as primary legal sources (e.g., France's Napoleonic Code).

    • In these systems, court decisions are informative but not binding.

  • Visual Aid: Map displaying legal systems worldwide.

    • Blue: Countries with civil law systems (Continental Europe, South America, parts of Africa).

    • Pink: Common law countries (predominantly English-speaking regions).

    • Examples of common law countries: The U.S., Canada, India, Australia, Singapore.

  • Variants of Law:

    • Yellow countries have Sharia law influence.

    • Brown indicates a hybrid of civil and common law (e.g., Louisiana).

    • Green shows customary law systems.

  • Common Law Development:

    • Influence of English system was foundational for U.S. legal structure.

    • Key customs regulating vengeance and property disputes led to early law establishment.

Chapter 3: Law And Property

  • Blood Feuds Regulation:

    • Early customs dictated responses to crimes (e.g., revenge killings).

    • Anglo Saxon kings reduced customary obligations to writing known as "dooms."

  • Historical Event: Battle of Hastings (1066) and its implications on law.

    • Norman Conquest led to the introduction of French terminology into English law.

    • William the Conqueror's promises reflected underlying values of fairness and consistency in law.

  • Establishment of Judicial Structure:

    • Formation of the Curia Regis (royal court) with subsequent courts (Exchequer, Common Pleas, King's Bench).

    • Importance of consistency in legal applications across localities.

Chapter 4: Origins of Common Law Processing

  • Development of Procedures:

    • Lawsuits required a writ from the Curia Regis to compel court appearances (akin to a subpoena today).

    • Example: Writ of Novel Disseisin for land disputes, leading to jury involvement in legal determinations.

  • Role of Judges in Common Law:

    • Judges relied on customs and community expectations to determine applicable laws.

    • Emphasis on natural reason and innate justice principles.

  • Shared Values in Law Development:

    • The quest to capture common values drove the evolution of common law systems.

    • Predictability, fairness, and the desire for consistent consequences cultivated trust in legal processes.

Chapter 5: Conclusion

  • Doctrine of Stare Decisis:

    • Latin term meaning “to stand by decisions.”

    • Courts adhere to established legal principles in similar future cases.

    • Establishment of a uniform understanding of law across England during medieval times.

  • Transition to U.S. Legal System:

    • Eighteenth-century British colonists adopted English common law as the initial legal framework.

    • Retrospective inquiries into the origins of U.S. law and the role of common law within it.

  • Upcoming Discussions:

    • Further examination into the U.S. legal system and common law operations in future lectures.