Parsons
Evidence-Based Staff Training Overview
Behavior analysts often train support staff in implementing intervention plans for challenging behavior and general behavior analysis principles (Macurik et al., 2008; Catania et al., 2009).
Effective training of staff is crucial to making a large-scale impact on consumers (Frazier, 1972).
Traditional didactic training methods (lectures, presentations) have proven ineffective for skill acquisition (Gardner, 1972; Alavosius & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1990).
Goals of Training
The primary goal is to improve performance skills rather than just enhancing knowledge (Parsons & Reid, 2012).
Emphasis on practical skills that staff can execute effectively in their roles.
Evidence-Based Protocol for Staff Training
Key Concepts
Performance-based training: Involves active performance of the skills during training.
Competency-based training: Continuing to train until trainees demonstrate competency in the target skills (Reid et al., 2003).
Components of Behavioral Skills Training (BST)
Describe the Target Skill: Provide rationale and behavioral definitions of the skill (Willner et al., 1977).
Tools like performance checklists are useful for this step (Lattimore et al., 1984).
Provide a Written Description: Offer a succinct summary of behavior requirements (Macurik et al., 2008).
Avoid overly complicated documents that staff may not refer back to.
Demonstrate the Target Skill: Use modeling to showcase the skill, preferably through role play or video (Adams et al., 1980).
Require Practice of the Target Skill: Trainees rehearse the skill through role play to reinforce learning (Adams et al., 1980).
Provide Feedback During Practice: Trainers observe and offer supportive and corrective feedback (Parsons & Reid, 1995).
Repeat Steps 4 and 5 to Mastery: Continue practice and feedback until trainees demonstrate competency (Neef et al., 1991).
On-the-Job Training
After group training, on-the-job training provides opportunities to apply learned skills in real situations (Clark et al., 2004).
Trainers observe trainees in their work environment and continue feedback until skills are utilized correctly in routine tasks.
Case Demonstration
Training involved two skill sets: Most-to-least prompting and manual signs.
Participants included teachers and a teacher’s assistant in an educational program for adults with severe disabilities.
Research showed notable increases in both prompting and manual signing performance after BST application.
Results and Effectiveness of Training
Skill competencies improved significantly from baseline to post-training assessments (e.g., ML prompting from 50% to 92%).
Acceptability feedback from participants indicated high satisfaction with the training, affirming its usefulness and practicality.
Practical Considerations for Implementation
Effectiveness: Staff training relying on verbal presentations is often ineffective (Casey & McWilliam, 2011).
Efficiency: BST requires more time investment but results in better job performance.
Acceptance: Programs must be acceptable to staff to avoid discontinuation (Wolf et al., 1995).
Conclusion
Evidence-based training uniquely positions behavior analysts to empower staff in their capabilities, enhancing service delivery to individuals with disabilities.
While effectiveness is encouraged, optimizing time efficiency and ensuring staff acceptance remain vital for the longevity of training programs.