INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY
INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY
- sociology is the scientific study of people in grou[s
- society - a large social grouping that shares the same geographic territory and is subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations
- sociological study examines certain behavioral patterns, skills, values and beliefs expected by a society
- sociology explores how the categories we belong to shape our experience of the world
- sociology also tries to understand how society and these different categories can influence our thoughts, feelings and actions
- some topics to research in sociology include
- gender differences, teen subcultures
- family, birth order, immigrant families
- education, religion, technology
- society and stress
- there are a variety of agents of socialization
- family, peer group, school
- workplace, culture, religion
- the mass media
- primary socialization
- the process of learning how to function in society at the most basic level
- the process by which we learn to;
- use language
- learn to eat
- practice hygiene
- deal with emotions
- how to behave according to gender
- secondary socialization
- the process of learning how to function in group situations
- learning how to behave in school, church, etc.
- we learn how to follow the behaviors society expects of us while acting in group situations
- anticipatory socialization
- the process of learning how to think ahead and to plan appropriate behavior in new situations
- resocialization
- the process in which society deliberately replaces negative aspects of a person’s behavior with new learning
- social groups
- two or more people with four characteristics
- they interact regularly and influence each other
- believe they have something in common (shared identity)
- have formal and informal social structure with leaders and followers
- have common values, behaviors and goals
- a crowd
- in the same place at the same time
- do not necessarily have anything in common
- do not interact regularly with one another
- have no influence over each other
- people are unaware of each other in any personal sense
- primary social group
- few members & interact often
- deep concern for others - shared culture
- close relationships - the relationship becomes the goal
- long term bonds
- interested in the whole individual personality of each group member
- these groups tend to have a direct effect on member’s personal identities
- problems within the primary bubble
- groups may demand members share common values and style
- can result in members committing acts to be accepted by the group
- expectations of different social groups may conflict with each other
- it is difficult to maintain a comfortable social dynamic
- secondary social group
- larger & interact less
- established to perform a function/purpose
- break apart easily - more impersonal/formal than primary
- members often have short-term or temporary relationships
- members are judges on what they can do for the group instead of who they are as a person
- group members have less influence on each other
- positive aspects of secondary social groups
- due to their less personal nature, members are less likely to conform, allowing personal expression
- conflicts between secondary groups also tend to be less frequent as their expectations tend to apply only to specific situations
- network
- a very loose group of individuals who have little interaction with each other
- can be a large number of people who live long distance from each other
- can be used when people are looking for a job
- young, well educated, urban people usually have the largest networks
- 3 ways groups influence behavior; roles, norms, sanctions
- roles - we learn through what is expected of us
- norms - rules within a group that indicate how members should behave
- mores - moral views, never to be broken
- folkways - everyday habits, manners, personal appearance
- sanctions - rules within a group that encourage or discourage behavior
- punishments or rewards to ensure rules are followed
- informal - smile, frown, praise, criticism
- formal - official public rewards, scholarship punishment, expulsion, driving ticket
- asch paradigm
- when an individual’s own opinions and actions are influenced by the majority of the group (conforms to the group)
- someone modifies his/her behavior based on the actions of the group
- cliques - informal and restrictive group formed by people who share common interests, views purposes, patterns of behavior or ethnicity (exclusive membership)
- main roles - hierarchy
- queen bee = power, friendship, increased self esteem
- followers = memberships, increased social life, closer friendships
- outcasts = bullying, depression, stress, low self esteem
- effects - bullying, insults, hazing (psychologically traumatizing)
- hazing
- a ritualistic/initiation test, which may include harassment, abuse, or humiliation to perform meaningless tasks
- newcomer is hazed, once accepted by the group, the victim becomes a bystander, and watches the hazing of others
- high school subculture
- main features: style, fashion, music, material possessions
- a means of gaining an identity for many trying to figure themselves out
- pros of cliques:
- support
- sense of belonging
- protection from other groups
- boosts self esteem
- creates a sense of identity
- cons of cliques:
- can take away individuality
- can become hostile to outsiders
- can alter your behavior
- members can be dropped
- crowds & mass behavior
- collective behavior
- the ways people act in crowds, social movements, cultures or society
- 3 characteristics:
- spontaneous & unpredictable
- localized
- irrational/dangerous
- sociologists have difficulty studying collective behavior because reactions from a crowd are not easy to predict
- types of crowds
- casual crowd
- very loose collection of people who react very little to each other
- may go out of way not to interact
- examples; people in a store, at a bus stop, on the street
- conventional crowd
- people gathered for a specific purpose
- conforms to norms appropriate for situation
- examples; school assembly, wedding, movie, religious site
- expressive crowd
- people gathered at an event with emotional appeal
- people join because they are excited about what might happen
- display emotions (clap, cheer, boo, etc.)
- examples; political rally, baseball game, concert
- acting crowd
- fuelled by a single purpose/goal
- think in simple terms (clearly right or wrong)
- reason ineffective in directing emotion
- can become dangerous
- examples; political rally, protest
- mob
- when an active crowd turns violent
- highly emotional crowd that pursues a destructive/violent goal
- riot
- frenzied crowd without a goal
- often includes random violence, looting, and/or vandalism
- mass behavior
- group behavior that involves people who are dispersed
- relies on personal communication through mass media and the internet
- panic
- collective behavior that causes people to react to a threat in an emotional irrational or self destructive way
- mass hysteria
- causes people to respond in an irrational and frantic way
- people have little to no contact with each other
- caused by actual (or imagined) event/idea
- social movements
- the collective behavior of people who promote or resist changes to society
- tend to last longer and be more organized than other kinds of collective behavior
- examples: political movements (equal rights, environmental concerns)
- sociologists ask 2 main questions when investigating social movements
- who will be affected by the social movement
- how much change is the movement seeking
- alternative social movements - seek an alternative or narrow change in a small portion of the population
- reformative social movements - seeks a limited change to all of society, want to reform society by pointing it in a new direction
- revolutionary social movements - try to change the basic structure of society, the change would impact every member of society
- theory of social movements
- social scientists have developed 4 theories to explain how and why social movements arise
- deprivation theory - started by people who feel deprived in some way
- mass society theory - appeal to people who feel socially isolated and insignificant and give these people a sense of belonging power and importance
- social concern theory - occur when a social institution or benefit is threatened by change
- structural strain theory - movements aim to bring fundamental and revolutionary change to society that is plagued with significant problems and people feel deprived as a result
- bystander effect
- the unwillingness of members of a crowd to get involved when help is needed
- altruistic (selfless, helpful) behavior is strongly influenced by the social situation
- particularly connected to the number of bystanders present
- the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely someone is to help
- factors that influence helping:
- situational ambiguity
- if it is unclear if something is an emergency, people are less likely to offer help
- less likely to help in unfamiliar environments
- examples: someone falls of bike and gets up holding arm
- when people are in strange cities rather than in their hometowns
- perceived cost
- more likely to help if cost to ourselves declines
- example: you are more likely to lend your class notes to someone you believe will return them (than to a person who doesn’t appear to be trustworthy)
- diffusion of responsibility
- less people present, means more people are likely to help
- more people = less sense of individual responsibility
- few people = harder to rationalize that someone else will help
- example: you suddenly felt faint and are about to pass out on the street
- you would be more likely to receive help if there are only a few passers-by present than if the street is crowded with pedestrians
- similarity
- people are more willing to help others who they perceive to be similar to themselves
- common background, beliefs, appearance
- examples: people are more likely to help others who dress like them those in different attire
- people tend to be more willing to help their kin than to help non--kin
- mood - people are generally more willing to help others when they are in a good mood
- gender - women tend to receive more help and assistance than men
- attributions of the cause of need
- people are much more likely to help others they judge to be innocent victims than those they believe have brought their problems on themselves
- example: they may fail to lend assistance to homeless people and drug addicts whom they feel “deserve what they get”
- social norms
- social norms define behaviors that are expected of people in social situations
- example: people are more likely to make a charitable donation when they are asked by a co-worker in full view of others than when they receive an appeal in the mail in the privacy of their own home
- socialization
- sociology - how groups and societies shape who you are; the relationships that exist between people, and the social structures they develop
- socius (latin) “companion”, -logy (greek) “the study of”
- two social sciences that focus on human behavior in a social context;
- sociology
- scientific study of people in groups
- goal is to understand & explain patterns of social behavior
- social psychology
- the study of individuals within their social & cultural setting
- examines how society influences human mental processes, behaviors, and personality
- branches of sociology
- macrosociology
- structural functionalism
- conflict theory
- feminist sociology
- microsociology
- symbolic interactionism
- structural functionalism
- view that different parts of society serve a purpose for the society as a whole
- ex. family, education, media, religion
- believe social problems are temporary & functions of social groups will improve over time
- emile durkheim
- early french sociologist considered to be one of the founders of modern sociology
- believed individuals identify with society in larger context (as a whole)
- people are the product of their social environment
- social order maintained through similarities in society (social cohesion)
- acknowledged deviance to norms to push society forward
- talcott parsons
- american sociologist
- individuals and groups defined by the purpose they serve in society
- interconnected institutions that fulfill the 4 functional prerequisites of society
- adaptation: economy providing material needs (i.e. employment, control prices and supply of resources
- goal attainment: resources organized so that the needs of the majority are met
- integration: population understand norms and values of society
- latency: pattern maintenance (prepare for future role in society, promotes meritocracy and tension management)
- criticisms of the functionalist approach
- ignores the conflicts in societies
- norms and values are explained as serving needs of society
- marxists and feminists would criticize functionalists on these grounds
- conflict theory
- view that power, not function, holds society together
- society = groups of people acting in competition
- this conflict may bring about change, progress or improvement
- people are motivated by external social & economic conditions
- inequalities of social classes or genders
- karl marx
- leading conflict sociologist of 19th century
- also considered the father of communism
- studied class conflicts (capitalism) throughout history
- bourgeois and the proletariat
- exploitation, alienation, revolution
- feminist sociology
- focus on women & gender inequality in society
- emphasis on better understanding of social roles of men & women in different cultures
- patriarchy: male dominance of employment, finances, and bodies
- strives to raise awareness & change - socially & politically
- ex. discrimination, domestic violence, date rape, etc.
- symbolic interactionism
- focus on the beliefs and actions of individuals and their meaning to the individuals
- human interaction is mediated by the use of symbols
- our relationships are developed by attempting to interpret these symbols
- meaning arises through interaction and is modified by thought
- what is socialization
- the type of learning that individuals receive from social contact which influences thinking & action
- how much of an individual’s development & behavior is the result of heredity (nature) or socialization & environment (nurture)?
- minnesota twin study
- compared sets of identical twins separated at birth
- similarities beyond physical traits
- suggest problems such as antisocial leanings, depression & alcoholism might involve genes
- differences in attitudes & values support importance of nurture
- isolated children
- isolates - children that have been physically, socially & emotionally deprived
- illustrates that severe developmental problems occur when no socialization occurs
- anna & genie show adequate socialization at a young age is essential for full physical, emotional, psychological & social development
- agents of socialization
- people and institutions that shape an individual’s social development
- family, school, peer groups, workplace, media, religion
- family influence
- basic needs - nutrition, language, communication, physical care, etc.
- rules of behavior - teaches right or wrong, proper and improper, appropriate and inappropriate
- personality development - gender roles, personal qualities
- school influence
- manifest function - the visible purpose of school, students learn a curriculum (standard knowledge and skills)
- latent function - the hidden purpose of school, students learn a certain set of beliefs and attitudes (cooperation, punctuality, self-reliance, competitiveness)
- peer group influence
- during adolescence, peer groups chrome the major agent of socialization
- learn skills such as communication, collaboration, compromise
- opportunity to talk about things discouraged by family (i.e. smoking, sexual attitudes, etc.)
- peer pressure, acceptance vs marginalization
- peer groups highly susceptible to media influence
- media influence
- exposed from an early age
- movies, radio, television, internet, social media, apps, impact our:
- expectations from life
- our values
- how we see ourselves
- unrealistic expectations
- regular socialization
- actual interaction with real people
- two way verbal or physical exchange
- person being socialized has an active role
- person being socialized can affect the outcome
- media socialization
- one-sided process
- person being socialized cannot interact
- agent sends a message that the viewer receives
- religious influence
- those that belong to, or were largely exposed to, some type of religion are influenced by it
- religion communicates guidelines for life on earth
- how to behave and treat others and the afterlife
- most religions take a particular standpoint on key issues within our society
- workplace
- messages from school are reinforced
- specialized language
- procedures
- rules & codes
- commit to success of employer
- dealing with colleagues, customers & competitors
- social behavior: the interaction among members of the same group responding to external or internal stimuli
- external stimuli: guided by what others in the same environment are doing
- internal stimuli: learned from your family, or media
- the effect of other people on a person’s thought and actions influences behavior
- direct influence: ex. joining friends at a sushi restaurant when you really what a burger
- indirect influence: ex. basing your decision to date someone on the reaction you think you’ll get from family or friends
- socialization: process by which the individual learns the behavioral patterns, skills and values of their social world
- socialization process
- basic needs - how to take physical care of oneself
- socially acceptable goals - such as employment, marriage, having a family
- roles & behavior - such as how to act in specific conditions (funeral, parties)
- categories of socialization
- primary - basic skills needed to survive in society
- secondary - process of learning how to behave in group situations
- anticipatory - how to plan the way to behave in new situations
- resocialization - process where negative behavior is transformed into acceptable behavior
- culture, gender roles, and gender identity
- sex - genetically defined, visibly identifiable
- gender - culturally defined, culturally constructed
- gender roles
- a set of societal norms
- dictates what types of behaviors are generally considered acceptable, appropriate or desirable for a person
- is based on their actual or perceived sex
- gender identity
- one's personal experience of one’s own gender
- is generally described as one’s private sense of being a man, woman or other
- consists primarily of the acceptance of membership into a category of male or female
- in what ways are genders constructed
- clothing, symbols
- classifications of male and female characteristics/roles
- relative values of genders
- how they are valued when compared with each other
- what behaviors are expected or acceptable
- cultural influences
- art & entertainment - popularizes body image
- environment - availability of resources influences who does what in a society
- values/religions/beliefs - provides a set of guidelines on what is acceptable within a culture for both roles and expression of identity
- education/institutions - determines what people learn, which then informs who they “should be”
- laws/customs - determine what people should or should not do, some roles and expressions of identity are controlled by law
- divisions of labor/power - expression of who can do what and who has more value in a society, an imbalance leads to a master-servant like scenario whereas a balance leads to an equilateral scenario
- social attitudes
- have a significant influence on the development of social identity in the individual
- our opinions may align with society’s views or stand in direct opposition to them
- a person may be forced to act as others do in society even through he or she may disagree
- for many social issues, the individual must learn to integrate both views
- have to resolve internal conflict and shape his or her response and identity accordingly
- not all social attitudes are easy to accommodate
- sexual orientation
- determined by who you’re romantically, physically, emotionally, and sexually attracted to
- figuring out your sexual orientation can be confusing
- for some people, an awareness of their own sexual orientation is clear from the beginning
- for other people, it takes time for them to develop a clear enough understanding
- sexual identity: how an individual presents to the world (ex. gay, lesbian, straight)
- gender identity: someone’s sense of being male or female
- gender role: characteristics attached to culturally defined notions of masculinity or femininity
- homosexual: someone who is physically and emotionally attracted to people of the same sex
- heterosexual: someone who is physically and emotionally attracted to people of the opposite sex, referred to as straight
- gay: a term for homosexual, can refer to both males and females but is mostly used to refer to men
- lesbian: a female homosexual
- bisexual: someone who is physically and emotionally attracted to people of the opposite and same sex
- transgender: someone whose gender identity is different from their biological sex
- transvestite/drag queen: someone who dresses in clothes of the opposite gender and for whom that dressing is sexually satisfying, many transvestites are heterosexual men
- pansexual: someone who has physical and emotional attraction toward persons of all gender identities and biological sexes
- intersex: a person whose sexual anatomy, genitalia or chromosomes that do not fit the typical definition of male or female, may identify as male, female or neither
- heterosexism: the assumption that heterosexuality is the social and cultural norm as well as the prejudiced belief that heterosexual people are socially and culturally superior to all other sexual orientations
- heterosexual privilege: is an advantage automatically given to heterosexual persons simply because they are heterosexual
- you don’t have to come out about your sexual identity
- you don’t have to justify your identity or legitimacy of your orientation
- your right to get married is never questioned
- you don’t have to fear violence because of your orientation
- you don’t have to worry about losing your family, friends or financial support
- you have ample and fairly accurate media representation
- you can talk about your partner and your love life openly
- you have the opportunity to learn about your privilege than experiencing oppression firsthand
- heteronormativity: cultural bias in favor of opposite-sex/gender relationships over same-sex relationships
- heteronormative bias
- under representation of same-sex couples in advertising and entertainment and media
- religious biases to marry same-sex couples
- heterosexual persons freely discussing their intimate relationships
- heterosexism is a systemic bias that have been encoded into major social and cultural institutions
- it causes undue stress which can affect one's physical, emotional, social, personal choices, and well being
- social institutions (schools, hospitals etc.) can act as a platform for heterosexist attitudes and beliefs to thrive
- schools may treat the lives of non-heterosexuals as sensitive topics
- hospitals may limit patient visit to immediate family and exclude same-sex partner
- heterosexism is systemic oppression which leads to, intersects with and fuels homophobia
- heterosexism and social attitudes lead to;
- homophobia: a fear and extreme dislike of gays, lesbians and bisexuals, often exhibited by prejudice, discrimination, harrasment and acts of violence
- internalized homophobia: the inner feelings of fear or shame about their sexuality, often caused by negative social attitudes and/or personal prejudice
- gay bashing: the act of attacking someone, physically, verbally, or in written form because of their sexual orientation or their perceived sexual orientation
- social acceptance is problematic for the LGBTQ+ community
- this is due to the social stigma attached to a sexual orientation other than straight
- most LGBTQ+ individuals struggle with accepting themselves
- they fear whether they will be accepted as a member of society
- LGBTQ+ individuals experience bullying harassment and discrimination on a daily basis
- many question their own identity and self throughout their lifetime
- some choose to say “closeted” while others decide to “come out”
- but even those who “come out” struggle with confidence and self-esteem
- benefits of coming out
- living an open and whole life
- developing close, more genuine relationships
- gaining self-esteem for being known and loved for who you really are
- reducing the stress of hiding our identity
- connecting with others in the LGBTQ+ community
- becoming part of a strong and vibrant community
- becoming a positive role model for others
- risks of coming out
- not everyone will be accepting
- family, friends, classmates, co-workers may be shocked, confused or hostile
- some relationships may permanently change
- may experience harassment or discrimination
- personal safety may be put at risk
- some young people may be thrown out of their home, or lose financial support
- discussions around racism
- racism: the belief that a particular race is superior or inferior to another, that a person’s social and moral traits are predetermined by his or her inborn biological characteristics
- stereotype: is a fixed and oversimplified idea or belief many people have about a thing or group that is based upon how they look on the outside
- systemic discrimination: patterns of behavior, policies or practices that are part of the structures of on organization which create or perpetuate disadvantage for racialized person
- prejudice: an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason
- crime & deviance
- sociologist William Graham Summer defined deviance
- deviance: a violation of established contextual, cultural, or social norms, whether folkways, mores, or codified law
- folkways: norms based on everyday cultural customs concerning practical matters like how to hold a fork, what type of clothes are appropriate for different situations, or how to greet someone politely
- mores: more serious moral injunctions or taboos that are broadly recognized in a society
- codified laws: norms specified in explicit codes and enforced by government bodies
- crime vs deviance
- crime is an act of deviance that breaks not only a norm, but a law
- deviance can be as minor as picking one’s nose in public or as major as committing murder
- acts of deviance are defined by society and its important to consider;
- social context
- what the existing rules are
- how did the rules come to be establish
- rules and norms vary across culture and time
- our understanding of deviance also changes
- moral entrepreneurs: individuals or groups who, in the service of their own interests, publicize and problematize “wrongdoing” and have the power to create and enforce rules to penalize wrong doing
- one tactic used by moral entrepreneurs is to create a moral panic about activities they deem deviant
- moral panic: occurs when media-fuelled public fear and overreaction lead authorities to label and repress deviants
- through social interaction, individuals are labeled deviant or come to recognize themselves as deviant
- social control: an organized action intended to change people’s behavior
- all societies practice social control, the regulation and enforcement of norms
- the underlying goal is to maintain social order
- social order: an arrangement of practices and behaviors on which society’s members base their daily lives
- rules are enforced by positive and negative sanctions
- positive sanctions - rewards for conforming to norms
- negative sanctions - punishments for violating norms
- informal vs formal sanctions
- informal emerges in face-to-face interactions (smiles, pat on the back)
- formal are ways to officially recognize and enforce norm violations (arrests)
- functionalist perspective
- concerned with how the different elements of society contribute to the whole
- view deviance as a key component of a functioning society
- social disorganization theory, strain theory, and cultural deviance theory are three functionalist perspectives on deviance in society
- durkheim believed deviance functions by challenging present views allowing society to progress
- merton expanded with the Strain Theory
- strain theory: asserts that access to socially acceptable goals plays a part in determining whether a person conforms or deviates
- from birth, we are encouraged to achieve the goal of financial success
- individuals adapt when according to their goals and means of achieving it
- social disorganization theory: asserts that crime is most likely to occur in communities with weak social ties and the absence of social control
- feminist perspective
- focuses on the way gender inequality influences the opportunities to commit crime and the definition, detection, and prosecution of crime
- many perspectives on spousal abuse etc.
- women regarded as criminally deviant are often seen as being doubly deviant
- they have broken the laws but they have also broken gender norms about appropriate female behavior
- men’s criminal behavior is seen as consistent with their aggressive, self-assertive character
- considered to be a double standard
- labeling theory - a symbolic interactionist approach
- symbolic interactionism: a theoretical approach used to explain how societies and/or social groups come to view behaviors as deviant or conventional
- labeling theory: the process of classifying kinds of people is a social process that Hacking calls “making up people” and Howard Becker calls “labeling”
- the social process of labeling some kinds of persons or activities as abnormal or deviant limits the type of social responses available
- who gets labeled by whom and the way social labels are applied have powerful social repercussions
- individuals who are labeled, live up to the labels attributed to them
- personality: nature vs. nurture
- personality: a usual way of thinking, feeling & acting that is unique to an individual
- socialization contributes to personality
- nature/nurture debate
- newborns not necessarily born with personalities already formed
- way babies are treated & personalities of people around them shape their development
- cultural attitudes
- encourages some traits & discourages others
- ex. gender roles & traits in western society
- birth order
- place within family influences development of certain characteristics
- is based on socialization
- child development
- psychological theories about development of personality & sense of self
- are tied to development as a whole
- freud & personality development
- main force is the unconscious mind
- through socialization the ego & superego develop to control the id
- interaction with others leads to development of a balanced personality
- j.piaget & cognitive development
- how children develop the ability to learn
- influenced by social & psychological factors
- introduced idea that personality develops over time
- children can shape their own social world
- four stages of development
- piaget’s four stages of development
- sensorimotor
- 0-2 years
- look, touch, taste, listen
- know the world through direct experience
- pre-operational
- 2-7 years
- experience world mentally through communication
- only see things from their point of view
- concrete operational
- 7-12 years
- complex operations (math) when physical objects are present
- think in terms of cause & effect
- can see things from point of view of others
- formal operational
- develops in adolescence
- think abstractly, use logic
- can imagine alternatives to reality
- c.h.cooley & the looking glass self
- sense of self or identity derived from socialization with others
- "looking-glass" self
- reactions of others are mirrors that show us who we are
- look to others to see reflection of our psychological selves & develop set of beliefs about ourselves
- starts with parents then expands to build & organize our self-concept
- e.erikson & lifelong development
- development of self doesn't end in childhood or adolescence
- it is a lifelong process
- psychosocial stages: resolving the challenges at each stage leads to healthy personality development
- infancy & childhood (0-11yrs): focus on developing emotionally, socially, intellectually & physically
- adolescence (11-18yrs): focus on developing concept of personal identity
- early adulthood (18-25yrs): learn to form close, lasting relationships & focus on career
- middle adulthood (25-50yrs): develop sense of accomplishment
- late adulthood (50+yrs): elders may be revered & respected
- a.maslow & self-actualized people
- identified personality traits of "self-actualized" people
- people who successfully meet their needs and fulfill their potential
- see things as they are, not as they wish them to be
- accept themselves
- think & behave independently
- have a task or mission in life
- stick with what they think is right
- react with emotion to important life experiences
- have concern for others
- experience deep emotional ties to others
- accept differences among people
- live according to ethical/moral standards
- have a sense of humor that is not unkind
- see some of the faults or limitations of own culture