PSYC1001 Social Psychology - Attitudes
Attitudes
Definition of Attitudes
- Attitudes are defined as the tendency to think, feel, or act positively or negatively towards objects in our environment (Banaji & Heiphetz, 2010).
Implicit vs. Explicit Attitudes
- Explicit attitudes: Attitudes that we can consciously think about, report on, and control.
- Implicit attitudes: Evaluations that we cannot consciously access, report on, or control.
- Implicit attitudes are more strongly impacted by early developmental events and are more sensitive to current affective (emotional) experiences.
Implicit Association Task (IAT)
- The IAT is used to measure implicit attitudes.
- It involves associating different categories (e.g., insects/flowers, pleasant/unpleasant) with response keys.
- Variations of the IAT include:
- Weight (fat/thin)
- Sexuality (gay/straight)
- Presidential popularity (Trump/other presidents)
- Disability (physically disabled/physically abled)
- Religion (Jewish/Christian)
- Transgender (transgender/cisgender)
- Gender-Science (male-female/science-liberal arts)
- Age (young/old)
IAT Scores and Implicit Bias
- IAT scores reflect implicit biases toward various groups:
- Straight People: 48%
- No Bias: 21%
- Gay People: 31% (N = 295,452)
- Thin People: 78.3%
- No Bias: 13.9%
- Fat People: 7.8% (N = 275,092)
- Abled People: 78.5%
- No Bias: 12.8%
- Disabled People: 8.7% (N = 138,873)
- White People: 59.9%
- No Bias: 21.3%
- Black People: 18.8% (N = 645,758)
- Cisgender People: 47.6%
- No Bias: 24.5%
- Transgender People: 27.9% (N = 118,012)
- Young People: 78.3%
- No Bias: 15.1%
- Old People: 6.6% (N = 275,006)
Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change Over Time
- Minimum time to neutral for:
- Sexuality (Implicit): 9 years
- Sexuality (Explicit): 5.5 years
- Race (Implicit): 58 years
- Race (Explicit): 2 years
Attitude Dimensions
- Specificity vs. Generality
- High vs. Low Accessibility
- Weak vs. Strong
Attitudes and Behavior: Three Principles
- Specificity: Attitudes predict behavior better when there is a match between the specificity vs. generality of the attitude and the behavior (the correspondence principle).
- Accessibility: Attitudes predict behavior better when an attitude is highly accessible.
- Strength: Attitudes predict behavior better when those attitudes are held strongly.
Dissonance
- Dissonance is the tension that occurs when behaviors are inconsistent with attitudes.
- Dissonance can be reduced by:
- Changing the behavior
- Changing the attitude
Cognitive Dissonance Classic Study #1
- Participants completed a boring task for over 1 hour.
- Control condition: No lie
- Lie condition 1: Participants told to say "It's so fun" for 1
- Lie condition 2: Participants told to say "It's so fun" for 20
- Outcome: Measured how much participants enjoyed the task and their willingness to participate in a similar experiment.
- Results: Participants in the 1lieconditionreportedenjoyingthetaskmorethanthoseinthe20 lie condition and the control condition.
Cognitive Dissonance Classic Study #2
- Participants were asked to taste test fried grasshoppers.
- Condition 1: Nice experimenter
- Condition 2: Mean experimenter
- Outcome: Measured how much participants enjoyed the grasshoppers and their willingness to endorse eating them to others.
- Results: Participants who had the mean experimenter stated that they liked the grasshoppers more and were more willing to endorse eating them than participants who had the nice experimenter.
Attitude-Discrepant Behavior and Dissonance
- Attitude-discrepant behavior performed for low reward:
- Large amount of dissonance leads to a large amount of attitude change.
- Attitude-discrepant behavior performed for high reward:
- Small amount of dissonance leads to a small amount of attitude change.
- Attitude-discrepant behavior performed for no good reason:
- Large amount of dissonance leads to a large amount of attitude change.
- Attitude-discrepant behavior performed for good reason:
- Small amount of dissonance leads to a small amount of attitude change.