Protein Quaternary Structure and Analytical Ultracentrifugation Notes

Protein Quaternary Structure and Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC)

Introduction

  • Protein Quaternary structure involves protein complexes, where individual proteins come together as oligomers.
  • These oligomers can be homo-complexes (same protein subunits) or heterocomplexes (different protein subunits).
  • Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC) is used to analyze proteins and determine their Quaternary structure.

Levels of Protein Structure

  • Primary Structure: The amino acid sequence.
  • Secondary Structure: Local folding, such as alpha helices and beta strands.
  • Tertiary Structure: The overall three-dimensional structure of a single protein molecule (covered in crystallography).
  • Quaternary Structure: The arrangement of multiple protein subunits in a complex.

Analytical Ultracentrifuge (AUC)

  • An AUC resembles a normal analytical centrifuge but with key differences.
  • It spins a sample in a cell, causing the sample to move from the center to the outside due to centrifugal force.
  • The distance traveled by the molecule is dictated by its size.
  • AUC is used to determine the sizes of proteins and protein complexes.
  • Two primary types of experiments can be performed:
    • Sedimentation Velocity
    • Sedimentation Equilibrium

AUC Rotor and Cells

  • The rotor contains cells, each with two sectors:
    • Sample Sector: Contains the protein sample in a specific buffer.
    • Reference Sector: Contains the buffer alone.
  • A monochromator directs light of a certain wavelength through the sample.
  • The absorbance of the protein is measured as it sediments down over time during spinning.
  • The reference is subtracted from the sample to account for the buffer's absorbance.
  • Sectors are not completely filled to avoid interference from the air-liquid interface.
    • Reference sector is filled higher than the sample sector.
  • Air-liquid interface causes scattering, resulting in peaks.
    • Reference meniscus shows a negative peak due to subtraction.
    • Sample meniscus shows a positive peak.
  • The protein absorbance forms a diffusion gradient as the protein moves down the sector.
  • The peaks indicate where the sample started and ended, allowing for distance measurement.
  • Knowing the distance and time, the size of the protein can be determined (larger proteins sediment faster).
  • The boundary indicates where the protein is at a specific time, and the plateau demonstrates constant sedimentation.

History and Units of AUC

  • The technique was first developed in 1926.
  • The first commercial AUC was built in 1947.
  • The founder of AUC was Theodore Svedberg.
  • AUC is measured in Svedberg units (S), where 1S=10131S = 10^{-13} seconds.

Sedimentation Velocity

  • High speeds are used to observe protein sedimentation over time.
  • The time and distance taken for sedimentation are measured.
  • The sedimentation coefficient is calculated and converted into mass.
  • Larger oligomers sediment faster than monomers.
  • The technique provides information on protein shape (round vs. elongated) and rate constants.

Sedimentation Equilibrium

  • Lower speeds are used, causing slower protein sedimentation.
  • As the protein reaches the bottom of the cell, back diffusion occurs due to the concentration gradient.
  • A balance between sedimentation and diffusion is achieved.
  • This provides information on protein mass, oligomeric state, and affinity of the oligomer.
  • It also reveals the stoichiometry (e.g., 1:1 or 1:2 complex) and stability of the sample.
  • Sedimentation velocity experiments are preferred because they can be completed in a few hours, whereas equilibrium experiments take a few days.

AUC Setup

  • The sample in the cell is placed in the rotor.
  • A Xenon lamp and monochromator direct light through the sample.
  • A photomultiplier tube detects the light.
  • Wavelengths of 280 nm are commonly used because proteins absorb well at this wavelength.

Svedberg Equation

  • The Svedberg equation is used to derive mass values from Svedberg units.
  • M=SRTD(1vˉρ)M = \frac{S \cdot R \cdot T}{D \cdot (1 - \bar{v} \cdot \rho)}
    • MM = Mass
    • SS = Svedberg coefficient (directly measured in AUC)
    • DD = Diffusion coefficient (measured in AUC)
    • vˉ\bar{v} = Partial specific volume of the protein
    • ρ\rho = Density of the buffer
    • RR = Gas constant
    • TT = Temperature (controlled in AUC)
  • The density of, of the sample (ρ)(\rho), and the partial specific volume (vˉ)(\bar{v}) can be calculated. The gas constant R\R can be derived due to the pressurised environment. The temperature TT can be controlled, and the diffusion coefficient DD and Svedberg coefficient SS are both measured values allowing for mass to be calculated.

Sedimentation Velocity Experiment

  • The radial position indicates the center and outside of the rotor.
  • Protein samples move toward the outside during the spinning process.
  • The meniscus represents scattering due to the buffer, and the sample peak shows protein scattering.
  • Boundaries form as the sample moves down, which is measured over time.
  • Boundaries are measured due to absorbance using a monochromator.

Raw Data of Sedimentation Velocity Profile

  • Reference meniscus and sample meniscus are identified.
  • The solution plateau and zero value are indicated.
  • The boundary shows individual time points as the protein moves down the sector.
  • The sample plateau represents the protein sedimenting down.
  • The bottom of the cell shows scattering when the protein reaches it.
  • The number of boundaries indicates the number of protein species in solution (one or two or more).

Computational Programs for Data Fitting

  • SEFIT is a program used to fit complex data with multiple species.
  • It breaks down data into blocks and models the data within each block, rather than trying to fit all of the data together at once.
  • This approach allows to derive much more accurate data for more complex mixtures of proteins.
  • A good fit is indicated by a small root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the data and the predicted model.
  • Residuals represent bias in the data; tight residuals without scattering are desired.

Models and Data Accuracy

  • Model 1 and Model 2 data sets are compared.
  • The data with the lower RMSD and tighter residuals is considered more accurate.
  • Data points fitting the model well indicate a reliable model representative of the raw data.

Complex Mixtures and Oligomeric States

  • Data from an AUC experiment with a complex mixture of proteins, such as APOE3 and APOE4, are analyzed.
  • The proteins form various oligomeric states, including monomers, tetramers, octamers, 12-mers, and 16-mers.
  • APOE4 is shown to be more prone to forming oligomers than APOE3.

Shape Information

  • Shape information can be derived from AUC experiments.
  • A spherical protein sediments faster than an elongated protein due to less friction.
  • This data can be used to model protein shape and provide more accurate information about protein mass.
  • The ribosome example is given, with 30S and 50S subunits combining to form a 70S complex due to shape changes.

Frictional Ratio

  • The frictional ratio changes as APOE3 and APOE4 form oligomers.
  • The monomer is elongated, but the overall complex becomes more spherical as more proteins bind together, resulting in a change in the frictional ratio.
  • A value of one represents a perfect sphere.

Case Studies

  • AUC is valuable for understanding protein behavior and interactions.
  • Example 1: Antigen 43
    • Antigen 43, found on the bacterial cell surface, allows bacteria to stick together and form biofilms.
    • AUC experiments showed that antigen 43 forms dimers in solution.
    • Oligomerization tends to be concentration-specific, with higher concentrations favoring oligomer formation.
    • Mutations causing the protein to straighten out resulted in a change in frictional ratio.
  • Example 2: Antibody-Based Inhibitor (FAB) binding to antigen 43.
    • Differentiation of an antigen 43 dimer from an antigen 43-FAB complex can be determined using AUC due to their different shapes, even if they have similar molecular weights.

Sedimentation Velocity Experiments Summary

  • Quaternary state of a protein (monomer, dimer, tetramer).
  • Protein complexes and heterozymer formation.
  • Protein binding to inhibitors or ligands.
  • Shape information.

Other Methods for Determining Quaternary Structure

  • SAXS (Small-Angle X-ray Scattering)
    • Requires a synchrotron.
    • Provides information about the shape and size of the protein in solution.
    • Generates an envelope of the protein.
    • Information obtained is approximate.
  • Blue Native PAGE
    • Kumasi brilliant blue is added to the protein, which gives the protein charge, and then the native protein is run on a gel to determine the protein quaternary structure.
    • Kumasi brilliant blue gives the protein a charge.
    • Sizes obtained are approximate because the markers may have different shapes than the protein.
  • Size Exclusion Chromatography
    • Proteins are passed through a resin column, with larger proteins moving faster than smaller proteins.
    • The column is calibrated with proteins of known molecular weight.
    • The shape of the proteins can affect the results, making it necessary to match the shape of the reference proteins to the sample proteins for decent information.
    • AUC does not have this limitation because it can derive shape information directly from the sample.