WEEK 3 TUT LEARNING 1 - CLASSICAL CONDITIONING 2
Learning Objectives
By the end of the lecture students can:
Apply classical-conditioning concepts to new scenarios.
Explain and exemplify extinction.
Describe clinical applications of classical conditioning.
Foundational Concept: Learning
Defined as enduring, observable behavioural change produced by experience (environmental interaction).
Includes habituation and sensitisation.
Behaviourist lens emphasises observable output over internal states.
Classical Conditioning Refresher
Discovered by Ivan Pavlov; focuses on involuntary responses.
Core idea: learn an association between two previously unrelated stimuli.
Key Terminology
Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) – naturally elicits response without learning.
Unconditioned Response (UCR) – reflexive response to UCS.
Conditioned Stimulus (CS) – originally neutral; gains power via pairing.
Conditioned Response (CR) – learned response to CS; formerly UCR.
Temporal Stages
Before conditioning: UCS → UCR; neutral stimulus ≠ response.
During conditioning: neutral stimulus precedes UCS repeatedly.
After conditioning: CS alone → CR (automatic).
In-Class Activity – Two Everyday Examples
Lost Item + Black Cockatoos
Emotion: uneasy/panicky when hearing black-cockatoo calls now.
Demonstrates stimulus discrimination (other bird calls not aversive).
Dog Bite → Dog Fear
General uneasy feeling toward all dogs; could reflect stimulus generalisation if fear extends beyond the specific dog.
Students asked to identify:
UCS, UCR, CS, CR
Whether generalisation or discrimination is observed.
Learning Efficiency & Exceptions
Typical conditioning requires multiple pairings.
Taste-Aversion Learning = exception; often one-trial learning.
Evolutionary logic: survival advantage to rapidly associate taste with illness.
Demonstration – Soup & Disgust (Rozin’s paradigm)
Participants rate soup desirability on – Likert scale:
"Clean fly-swatter soup": rated < 4 (dislike).
"Brand-new fly-swatter soup": rated < 4.
"Clean comb soup": rated < 4.
"Dog-bowl soup": rated < 4.
Highlights power of association principle even when contamination is objectively absent.
Biological Preparedness (Garcia & Koelling, )
Rats more readily link taste (CS) with nausea (UCR) than with light/sound.
When UCR is pain, reverse pattern: auditory/visual CS pair more easily.
Conclusion: organisms are biologically predisposed to form certain CS–US links.
Extinction, Spontaneous Recovery & Graphical Review
Acquisition: reinforced (CS→US) trials → rising CR magnitude (e.g., salivation).
Extinction: repeated CS-only presentations ↓ CR.
Spontaneous Recovery: after rest interval , CR partially re-emerges.
Therapeutic Applications of Extinction
Systematic desensitisation / Exposure therapy for height phobia.
Gradual, non-reinforced contact with feared stimulus → CS no longer predicts aversive US.
Similar protocol for dental fear and chemotherapy-related food aversions.
Incorporate counter-conditioning (pair CS with pleasant US) when appropriate.
Media Illustrations
Video: The Office "Pavlov Experiment" shows practical joke pairing computer chime (CS) with mint offer (US) → colleague expects mint upon hearing CS.
BMW ad reference—illustrates conditioning in marketing (brand CS + pleasure US).
Linking to Future Content – Operant Conditioning Preview
Students asked to reflect on behaviours in friends/pets they wish to increase or decrease.
Sets stage for reinforcement/punishment principles next class.
Action Items Before Next Class
Complete Week quiz on Moodle.
Watch assigned video clip on operant conditioning.
Read textbook chapter on Operant Conditioning.
Continue Written Assignment (requires correct referencing).
Review Referencing & Plagiarism materials on Moodle.
Practical & Ethical Take-Aways
Responsible scholarship demands proper referencing; plagiarism penalties compromise academic integrity.
Understanding conditioning aids in therapy, marketing, habit change, and ethical considerations (e.g., respecting autonomy when applying behavioural techniques).