Primary Documents
primary documents
1.
2.George Grant (1965)
From “FLQ Manifesto 1970,” translated and edited by D.C. Bélanger From Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism,
a public declaration of policy and aims, especially one issued
before an election by a political party or candidate.
He is an Associate Professor of Canadian history at the University of
Ottawa
History
Historical Interpretations
historical interpretations
3.From “Québécoises deboutte! Nationalism and Feminism in Quebec,
1969–1975,” Sean Mills
Primary Documents
primary documents
1.
• Define manifesto:
• D.C. Belanger:
Front de liberation du Quebec (FLQ)
History
o Hands are clean of the British parliamentary system
o Fighting for Bourassa to get his 100 000 revolutionary workers
o Believes that federalism penalizes the Quebec milk producers to satisfy the needs
of Anglo-Saxons of the Commonwealth
o Is attacking the federal system:
Disagrees with importation policies
Attacking how low wage earners in textile and shoe manufacturing trades are not treated well
Disagrees with Canada negatively labelling Quebec as an ethnic minority
Thinks government is pathetic because always trying to impress American millionaires
o Calling out Quebec workers to take back their factories, machines, hotels, universities unions and make their own revolutions in the own neighborhoods and workplaces
2.From Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism, George Grant (1965)
From lament for a nation: the defeat of Canadian nationalism, George Grant (1965)
• Lament: George Grant: To lament is to cry out at the death or at the dying of something loved.
o Mourns the end of Canada as a sovereign state
• George Grant: Canadian philosopher who wrote the book Lament for a Nation
• Text argues: It argues that Canada’s disappearance was a matter of necessity.
• Hate for Protestant politician, Mr. John Diefenbaker
o In office
o Egocentric
His research has addressed questions of migration, race, culture, political thought, and gender.
History
Q: I have implied that the existence of a sovereign Canada served the good. But can the disappearance of an unimportant nation be worthy of serious grief?
A: For some older Canadians it can. Our country is the only political entity to which we have been trained to pay allegiance.
History
• On the evening of 28 November 1969, 200 women—many wearing chains to symbolize their oppression—charged out of their meeting place on Saint-Laurent boulevard into the middle of the street, where they sat down in a circle and waited to be arrested.
• Women’s liberation movement: 1969, women on Montreal’s English-speaking university campuses united and formed the Montreal Women’s Liberation Movement (MWLM).
History
History
• How women in the FLF were relegated to subordinate and traditionally feminine roles within mixed groups, while being excluded from the larger movement.
History
Subheaders:
History
• Experimented with new non-hierarchical forms of organization, had a large impact on Quebec’s feminist movement.
• In 1971, internal divisions and reduced membership caused the group to dissolve.
• Anti-colonial framework for understanding the triple exploitation of Quebec women was
transported into the Centre des femmes.
Centre des femmes:
• Established in 1972 by ex-FLF members.
• Focused on analysis and becoming a politically homogeneous nucleus of revolutionary
feminists.
• Published Quebec’s first women’s liberation newspaper.
• Maintained a focus on Quebec workers and situated their “role as housewives, workers, and mothers in the context of Quebec society.”
• Sought to draw Quebec women together into a revolutionary organization. Revisionist History:
• Centre des femmes used their newspaper to create a revisionist version of Quebec history.
• Offered a counter-narrative to dominant representations of the past and radical histories,
which ignored the contributions of Quebec women.
• Recovered the voice of women in the past to create a more inclusive history for contemporary political struggles.
THE END OF A NATIONAL DREAM
the end of a national dream
• The Centre des femmes initially followed FLF's nationalist principles but later abandoned them.
• The abandonment of national liberation was influenced by changing parameters of nationalism, feminism, and the left, including the increasing domination of Marxist- Leninism.
• The Centre des femmes became heavily involved in the struggle to legalize abortion and saw the criminalization of abortion as a corollary of capitalism.
History
• The Centre des femmes established a link between capitalism and the nuclear family and called for "free abortion on demand."
• The Centre des femmes launched an attack on the policies of the newly formed Parti Québécois (PQ) at the same time as they became heavily involved in the struggle to legalize abortion.
• Class politics began to assume priority over national liberation for many leftists, which had a significant impact on the Centre des femmes.
• The Centre des femmes' attack on the Parti Québécois (PQ) needs to be situated in the changing ideological parameters of political dissent and the increasing influence of Marxist-Leninism.
• The Centre des femmes abandoned "the nation" as its site of struggle, and its immediate reaction was triggered by the PQ's adoption of "pro-women" resolutions at its February 1973 convention.
• The Centre des femmes argued that the PQ sought only to institutionalize women's roles and preserve the family, an institution responsible for the exploitation of women and the bedrock of capitalism. The PQ did not advocate free and legal access to abortions or a socialization of housework.
PQ’s insincere policies and the celebration of the nuclear family
• The Centre des femmes believed that the PQ’s policies towards workers and women were insincere and institutionalized the “private work carried out within the family”.
• The party sought to preserve the family, which the Centre des femmes linked with capitalism and right-wing nationalist parties.
• The Centre des femmes saw the PQ’s valorization of the family structure as an impediment to the struggle for women’s liberation.
Distancing from the national project
• The Centre des femmes began to distance itself from the national project as Quebec nationalism was no longer compatible with its struggle for legalized and state-funded abortion and emancipation in general.
History
• Many activists of the era were situating themselves within a class-based movement and turning away from the language of national alienation.
• The centre increasingly focused on class exploitation, seeing itself as forming part of the international struggle of all women and workers.
Making women’s liberation a key demand of the working class
• The centre argued that it was by making women’s liberation a “key demand of the working class that [women] will put an end to the present system of exploitation”.
• Women formed an essential element of the capitalist mode of production, and their unpaid work in the home acted as “the economic cement of the capitalist system”.
• By doing housework, women reinforced the labour power of the husband, and their exclusion from decision-making power was a consequence of society's determination of human worth by money.
Transformation within the women's movement and the Quebec left
• By the mid-1970s, the women's liberation theory in Montreal had transformed, and the women's movement had become part of a larger transformation within the language and structures of the Quebec left.
• The Centre des femmes opposed the PQ's program, which it believed stood in direct opposition to its goal of eliminating gender discrimination. The internal conflict caused the Centre des femmes to dissolve, marking the end of the initial phase of Quebec feminism.
• The women's movement gained new momentum and attracted an unprecedented number of participants in 1975, International Women's Year. The movement expanded the possibilities of imagining a more just future, but it was not without its own contradictions and shortcomings, producing its own dynamics of exclusion and remaining silent on crucial questions such as homosexuality and race.