Chapter 12: Power and Politics
Chapter 12: Power and Politics
Introduction to Power and Politics
- Definition of Power
- Power is defined as the ability of a person or group to influence or control some aspect of another person or group.
- Associated with control over resources others need, such as money, information, decisions, and work assignments.
- Encompasses:
- The ability to get someone to do something you want done.
- The ability to make things happen in the way you want.
- Importance of Power
- Essential for functioning within social structures and organizations.
Types of Power
- Social Power
- Refers to the power derived from social relationships.
- Earned through relationships and can be lost if misused.
- Force
- Describes the power exerted against another’s will.
Dependency and Control
- Dependency
- One party relies on another for what they need.
- Dependency can grant power if it cannot be easily removed; non-compliance lessens power.
- Control
- Authority or ability to influence others regarding resources and decision-making.
- Powerholders possess crucial competencies and decision-making functions (e.g., executives, skilled technicians).
Powerlessness
- Definition
- Powerlessness is characterized by a lack of autonomy and participation, causing feelings of being subjugated.
- Impact on Behavior
- Exhibited through body language (e.g., shrinking in, less assertive gestures).
- Can lead to negative outcomes like absenteeism, tardiness, theft, and counterproductive behaviors.
Empowerment
- Concept
- Involves sharing power, information, rewards, and decision-making.
- Empowers individuals, encouraging energy and fulfillment at work.
- Consequences of Zero-Sum Thinking
- Viewing power as a zero-sum game can create imbalances where one’s gain equates to another's loss.
- Zero-Sum Game
- A situation where one person's gain is equivalent to another's loss (“I win, you lose”).
- Iron Law of Responsibility
- When power imbalances escalate, mechanisms emerge to redistribute power, similar to lobbying for regulations.
- Psychological Reactance Theory
- Suggests individuals tend to resist constraints placed upon them and will rebel against attempts to control behavior.
Sources of Power
- Two Main Categories: position and personal power.
- Position Power
- Derives from formal authority within an organization's hierarchy.
- Personal Power
- Inherent to the individual, originating from personal qualities and relationships.
Types of Position Power
- Legitimate Power
- Comes from formal hierarchical authority and belief in the right to command.
- Subordinates’ obligation to comply with legitimate requests.
- Chester Barnard's concept: "Zone of Indifference"—employees comply with directives within this range without critical evaluation.
- Overuse of Legitimate Power
- Can lead to "hierarchical thinking"—a state where employees defer responsibility.
- Reward Power
- Extracted from the ability to distribute positive rewards or alleviate negative consequences.
- For rewards to be effective, they must be seen as fair.
- Coercive Power
- The capacity to impose negative consequences or withdraw rewards.
- Misuse leads to damaged relationships and necessitates policies to protect employees against abuse.
Personal Power
- Resides within individuals, stemming from personal attributes:
- Expert Power: Derives from special skills and abilities that fulfill others' needs.
- Example: Expert power is relative; a top cook may lose it to a professional chef.
- Referent Power: Gains traction because others wish to align with the individual (e.g., respected leaders).
- Information Power
- Based on possessing or having access to valuable information.
- Can be positional or personal.
- Connection Power
- Increasingly vital in modern organizations; stems from networks and relationships.
- Involves calling upon connections for assistance in achieving goals.
- Association Power: Influence with powerful individuals; reflected in the saying, “It’s not what you know but who you know.”
- Reciprocal Alliances: Power derived from mutually beneficial relationships and exchanges.
Influence and Compliance
- Herbert Kelman's Levels of Conformity
- Compliance: Accepting influence for rewards or to avoid punishment.
- Commitment: Acceptance of influence due to obligations; shows initiative and persistence.
- Subsequent forms of commitment:
- Identification: Conforming to maintain a positive relation with influence sources.
- Internalization: Adopting beliefs and actions that coincide with personal values.
Resistance to Influence
- Definition
- Resistance manifests as refusal to comply, arguing, or stalling.
- Types of Resistance Strategies:
- Constructive Resistance: Thoughtful dissent that constructively challenges influence sources.
- Dysfunctional Resistance: Passive non-compliance, such as ignoring requests.
The Bathsheba Syndrome
- Defined as ethical lapses by individuals in positions of power who believe they are above reproach.
- Recommendations to avoid include maintaining humility and surrounding oneself with dissenting voices for perspective.
Organizational Politics
- Involves members' informal efforts to attain resources and goals.
- Consists of both formal (dictating procedures) and informal systems (arising from everyday interactions).
- Self-interested Politics: Occurs when individuals prioritize personal gain over organizational welfare, involving behaviors such as favoritism and scapegoating.
- Political Climate: Collective perceptions regarding the political aspects of organizational life and processes.
Self-Protection Strategies in Organizations
- Common defensive strategies include:
- Avoidance: Steering clear of risks, “working to the rules.”
- Redirecting Accountability: Techniques for “passing the buck” or rigorous documentation to shift responsibility.
- Rewriting History: Claiming credit or deflecting blame as situations evolve.
- Scapegoating: Blaming external factors or uncontrollable events to deflect responsibility.