Chapter 12: Power and Politics

Chapter 12: Power and Politics

Introduction to Power and Politics

  • Definition of Power
    • Power is defined as the ability of a person or group to influence or control some aspect of another person or group.
    • Associated with control over resources others need, such as money, information, decisions, and work assignments.
    • Encompasses:
    • The ability to get someone to do something you want done.
    • The ability to make things happen in the way you want.
  • Importance of Power
    • Essential for functioning within social structures and organizations.

Types of Power

  • Social Power
    • Refers to the power derived from social relationships.
    • Earned through relationships and can be lost if misused.
  • Force
    • Describes the power exerted against another’s will.

Dependency and Control

  • Dependency
    • One party relies on another for what they need.
    • Dependency can grant power if it cannot be easily removed; non-compliance lessens power.
  • Control
    • Authority or ability to influence others regarding resources and decision-making.
    • Powerholders possess crucial competencies and decision-making functions (e.g., executives, skilled technicians).

Powerlessness

  • Definition
    • Powerlessness is characterized by a lack of autonomy and participation, causing feelings of being subjugated.
  • Impact on Behavior
    • Exhibited through body language (e.g., shrinking in, less assertive gestures).
    • Can lead to negative outcomes like absenteeism, tardiness, theft, and counterproductive behaviors.

Empowerment

  • Concept
    • Involves sharing power, information, rewards, and decision-making.
    • Empowers individuals, encouraging energy and fulfillment at work.
  • Consequences of Zero-Sum Thinking
    • Viewing power as a zero-sum game can create imbalances where one’s gain equates to another's loss.
  • Zero-Sum Game
    • A situation where one person's gain is equivalent to another's loss (“I win, you lose”).
  • Iron Law of Responsibility
    • When power imbalances escalate, mechanisms emerge to redistribute power, similar to lobbying for regulations.
  • Psychological Reactance Theory
    • Suggests individuals tend to resist constraints placed upon them and will rebel against attempts to control behavior.

Sources of Power

  • Two Main Categories: position and personal power.
  • Position Power
    • Derives from formal authority within an organization's hierarchy.
  • Personal Power
    • Inherent to the individual, originating from personal qualities and relationships.

Types of Position Power

  • Legitimate Power
    • Comes from formal hierarchical authority and belief in the right to command.
    • Subordinates’ obligation to comply with legitimate requests.
    • Chester Barnard's concept: "Zone of Indifference"—employees comply with directives within this range without critical evaluation.
  • Overuse of Legitimate Power
    • Can lead to "hierarchical thinking"—a state where employees defer responsibility.
  • Reward Power
    • Extracted from the ability to distribute positive rewards or alleviate negative consequences.
    • For rewards to be effective, they must be seen as fair.
  • Coercive Power
    • The capacity to impose negative consequences or withdraw rewards.
    • Misuse leads to damaged relationships and necessitates policies to protect employees against abuse.

Personal Power

  • Resides within individuals, stemming from personal attributes:
    • Expert Power: Derives from special skills and abilities that fulfill others' needs.
    • Example: Expert power is relative; a top cook may lose it to a professional chef.
    • Referent Power: Gains traction because others wish to align with the individual (e.g., respected leaders).

Information and Connection Power

  • Information Power
    • Based on possessing or having access to valuable information.
    • Can be positional or personal.
  • Connection Power
    • Increasingly vital in modern organizations; stems from networks and relationships.
    • Involves calling upon connections for assistance in achieving goals.
    • Association Power: Influence with powerful individuals; reflected in the saying, “It’s not what you know but who you know.”
    • Reciprocal Alliances: Power derived from mutually beneficial relationships and exchanges.

Influence and Compliance

  • Herbert Kelman's Levels of Conformity
    • Compliance: Accepting influence for rewards or to avoid punishment.
    • Commitment: Acceptance of influence due to obligations; shows initiative and persistence.
    • Subsequent forms of commitment:
    • Identification: Conforming to maintain a positive relation with influence sources.
    • Internalization: Adopting beliefs and actions that coincide with personal values.

Resistance to Influence

  • Definition
    • Resistance manifests as refusal to comply, arguing, or stalling.
  • Types of Resistance Strategies:
    • Constructive Resistance: Thoughtful dissent that constructively challenges influence sources.
    • Dysfunctional Resistance: Passive non-compliance, such as ignoring requests.

The Bathsheba Syndrome

  • Defined as ethical lapses by individuals in positions of power who believe they are above reproach.
  • Recommendations to avoid include maintaining humility and surrounding oneself with dissenting voices for perspective.

Organizational Politics

  • Involves members' informal efforts to attain resources and goals.
  • Consists of both formal (dictating procedures) and informal systems (arising from everyday interactions).
  • Self-interested Politics: Occurs when individuals prioritize personal gain over organizational welfare, involving behaviors such as favoritism and scapegoating.
  • Political Climate: Collective perceptions regarding the political aspects of organizational life and processes.

Self-Protection Strategies in Organizations

  • Common defensive strategies include:
    • Avoidance: Steering clear of risks, “working to the rules.”
    • Redirecting Accountability: Techniques for “passing the buck” or rigorous documentation to shift responsibility.
    • Rewriting History: Claiming credit or deflecting blame as situations evolve.
    • Scapegoating: Blaming external factors or uncontrollable events to deflect responsibility.