Courts

American Institutions: The Courts

The Federal Courts: Overview

  • Focus on understanding the structure and function of federal courts in the American legal system.

The Legal System: Criminal Law

  • Definition of Criminal Law: A branch of law regulating individual conduct, defining crimes, and specifying punishments for criminal acts.

    • Key Points:

    • The government acts as the plaintiff in criminal cases (e.g., State of Florida v. Casey Anthony).

    • Range of matters: from minor traffic offenses to serious felonies like murder.

    • Consequences for defendants: can include fines or incarceration.

    • Burden of proof: defendants must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Legal System: Civil Law

  • Definition of Civil Law: A branch dealing with disputes that do not involve criminal penalties.

    • Key Points:

    • Disputes typically among individuals, groups, corporations, or private entities (e.g., American Government Student X v. Professor Quackenbush).

    • Losers generally face monetary damages but not jail time.

    • Standard of proof: findings are based on a preponderance of the evidence.

The Legal System: Public Law

  • Cases that address government power or individual rights are considered public law cases.

    • Significance: These cases affect society at large, not just the immediate parties involved.

    • Example: Obergefell v. Hodges addressed same-sex marriage rights, influencing societal law beyond the plaintiffs' wishes.

The Legal System: Precedent

  • Definition of Precedent: A prior case whose principles judges use to make decisions in current cases.

    • Doctrine of Stare Decisis: Means "let the decision stand"; courts adhere to precedents to maintain consistency in legal decisions.

Types of Courts

  • Courts are established federally and by individual states.

  • Over 97% of all court cases are handled in state courts.

    • Trial Courts: First courts to hear a case (original jurisdiction).

    • If a guilty verdict occurs, the defendant can appeal to a higher court (e.g., state court of appeals, then state supreme court).

    • Notable restriction: the government cannot appeal a "not guilty" verdict.

Types of Courts: Appellate Court

  • Appellate Court: Handles appeals filed by the appellant (the party appealing).

    • Key Points:

    • Appeals can be based on a “prejudicial error,” where legal errors from the trial court must be shown.

    • Appellate courts do not hear witnesses or accept new evidence.

    • Operates under appellate jurisdiction.

The Plea Bargain

  • Definition: A negotiated agreement in a criminal case between prosecutors and defendants.

    • Mechanism: The defendant pleads guilty in exchange for a reduction in the severity of charges.

Types of Courts: Jurisdiction

  • Definition of Jurisdiction: The extent of a court's power and authority.

    • Federal court jurisdiction arises from the U.S. Constitution and federal statutes.

The Federal Courts: Which Cases Are Heard?

  • Federal courts hear cases involving:

    • Federal laws or treaties.

    • The U.S. government as a party.

    • Civil cases involving diverse citizenship (more than one state) with stakes over $75,000.

    • Plaintiffs may choose between state and federal court for certain cases.

The Federal Courts: Lower Courts

  • Original Jurisdiction: Supreme Court's limited authority granted under Article III of the Constitution.

    • Types of cases with original jurisdiction include:

    • Cases involving the U.S. vs. individual states.

    • Cases between multiple states.

    • Involving foreign ambassadors.

    • Brought by states against citizens of another state.

The Federal Courts: Trial Courts

  • Federal Trial Courts: Authorized 678 federal district judges spread across 94 federal district courts.

    • The busiest courts may have up to 28 judges, but each case typically assigned to a single judge.

    • Exceptions may require a three-judge panel under specific statutes.

The Federal Courts: Appellate Courts

  • Federal Appellate Courts: Review roughly 20% of lower-court cases.

    • Comprise 11 regional circuit courts, the DC circuit, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

    • There are 179 court of appeals judges.

    • Decisions are final unless reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Federal Appellate Courts: Circuits

  • Maps and circuits distinguish jurisdictions of various appellate courts across the U.S. (refer to Figure 12.2).

The Federal Courts: Supreme Court

  • U.S. Supreme Court: The highest court in the nation, consisting of nine justices.

    • Authority: Presides over constitutional interpretation and statutory law on both state and federal levels.

    • The constitution does not stipulate the number of justices; it can be changed by Congress.

Supreme Court Justices, 2019

  • Table of Justices: Lists names, years of birth, prior experiences, and appointing presidents.

    • Includes notable justices like Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Roberts, and more.

The Federal Courts: Appointments

  • Justice Nomination: Federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

    • Justice Amy Coney Barrett was appointed to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020.

    • General criteria: legal experience, character, alignment with presidential views.

The Federal Courts, Part 2: Appointment Controversies

  • Judicial Nominations: Often contested, especially for Supreme Court positions, leading to political strife.

U.S. Supreme Court: Judicial Review

  • Judicial Review: Significant power allowing courts to declare laws or actions unconstitutional.

    • Originated from Marbury v. Madison (1803).

    • The Court has declared fewer than 160 acts of Congress unconstitutional in over two centuries.

Judicial Review: States

  • Supreme Court's authority to review state laws for constitutionality arises from the supremacy clause.

    • Striking down laws that violate due process or civil rights has occurred through judicial review.

Most Cases Reach Supreme Court on Appeal

  • Criteria for Cases:

    • A legitimate dispute must exist, not hypothetical.

    • Standing: Must have a stake in the outcome to sue.

    • Mootness: Dismissals occur for resolved issues.

Most Cases Reach Supreme Court on Appeal, Part 2

  • Writs of Certiorari: Main way cases reach the Supreme Court.

    • Cerworthy cases typically involve conflicting opinions among courts or important federal law matters.

Cases Filed in the U.S. Supreme Court

  • Trends in Filings: Historical figures illustrating the number of cases filed in the Supreme Court from 1938-2017.

    • Provides insight into legal activity trends and workload over time.

Lobbying for Access

  • Interest Groups: Employ long-term strategies for legal influence.

    • Test cases are brought under favorable conditions with an expectation of specific circuit court outcomes.

    • Aim to establish patterns and inconsistencies to enhance chances for Supreme Court review.

The Supreme Court’s Procedures: Preparation

  • Case Acceptance: Acceptance triggers a thorough process including briefs from both sides.

    • Briefs: Documents detailing legal stances filled with precedents, often supported by external entities (amicus curiae).

The Supreme Court’s Procedures: Oral Argument

  • Oral Argument Session: Attorneys present cases before the Court for half an hour, including responses to justices’ queries.

    • This stage can greatly impact case outcomes.

The Supreme Court’s Procedures: Conference

  • Conference Procedure: Following oral arguments, justices privately vote, starting with the chief justice and continuing by seniority.

    • Decisions often require majority consensus even in divided circumstances.

The Supreme Court’s Procedures: Opinions

  • Majority Opinion Writing: After a decision, one justice from the majority drafts the opinion, especially assigned by the chief justice.

    • The opinion circulates among justices for feedback.

The Supreme Court’s Procedures: Dissent

  • Dissenting Opinions: Justices may express disagreement publicly post-decision, allowing insights into different viewpoints and potential future influences.

Judicial Philosophies

  • Overview of differing judicial philosophies, primarily focusing on judicial activism vs. judicial restraint.

  • Explores implications of these philosophies on legal interpretations and court rulings.