APHUG 10.1-10.2
1. Federal vs. Unitary States
Federal States:
Power is shared between the national government and regional governments (e.g., U.S., Canada, India).
States/provinces have autonomy in certain areas like education, transportation, and law enforcement.
Encourages diversity and local representation.
Can lead to inefficiencies or conflict between levels of government.
Advantages:
Reduces conflict in diverse societies.
Encourages political participation at local levels.
Local policies can be tailored to specific needs.
Disadvantages:
Slower to enact national policy.
Inequality in services (e.g., education, health) due to varied regional funding.
Local leaders may block national reforms.
Unitary States:
Centralized government holds most power (e.g., France, Japan, UK).
Regional governments have little or no independent authority.
Policy decisions made at the national level and imposed top-down.
Advantages:
More efficient policy-making.
Uniform laws and regulations.
Often fewer government agencies = streamlined governance.
Disadvantages:
Less local representation.
May ignore local needs.
Risk of over-centralization and disconnect from rural/peripheral areas.
2. Political Power and Spatial Organization
Unitarism and Federalism affect how power is distributed across space.
Centralized states (unitary) manage from a single core; federal states disperse power across regions.
Local units in federal states can provide services tailored to cultural and economic needs.
Examples:
Singapore’s efficient transit system shows unitary efficiency.
U.S. school funding disparities show federalism’s uneven resource distribution.
3. Gerrymandering
Definition:
The manipulation of voting district boundaries to favor one political party or group.
Tactics:
Packing: Concentrating opposing voters into one district.
Cracking: Splitting opposing voters across multiple districts to dilute their vote.
Types:
Partisan gerrymandering: Based on political party advantage.
Racial gerrymandering: Manipulating boundaries based on race—often challenged in court.
Consequences:
Reduces electoral competitiveness.
Undermines democratic representation.
Often results in legal challenges and reforms (e.g., independent commissions in some states).
4. Representation and Reapportionment
Census every 10 years → triggers reapportionment of House seats.
States gain or lose congressional representation based on population shifts.
Redistricting follows reapportionment and is highly political.
Electoral College:
Tied to number of House + Senate seats per state.
Changes in district maps can impact presidential elections.